The only shortcoming is the small number of papers published each year, but the quality is high. You can see this by how much the IF has risen in the past two years.

(0) Thank | YY

Is Under Review directly after submitted an internal review?

(0) Thank | 琪

What about now? I just applied

(0) Thank | 宫古孟阳

The overall number of articles in this journal is a bit low, but the quality of each piece seems to be good. I reckon the editors have put in a lot of effort to carefully select each article. It's a small but lovely journal, quite interesting

(0) Thank | 邻家银河

Overall, it feels very nice. I just got one accepted, but the review and proofreading speeds are not very fast. It took 2 months to get accepted, and now I just hope to see it published as soon as possible. The whole process is very standard, and I hope the journal can continue to maintain a high level of article quality and move from Q2 to Q1!

(0) Thank | 新洁小郎君

Have you submitted? I submitted a week ago and it's still in the submitted status

(0) Thank | 梓菱郎

My friend recommended me to pay attention to this journal. After carefully studying it, I found it to be really good. The impact factor is moderate, and it is easy to publish in. Maybe not many people have paid attention to it, but I feel like I have found a treasure

(0) Thank | 香风易绿

What type of article did you send?

(0) Thank | Harry MacDonald

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0 
Experience sharing: I worked hard on an article for over half a year, it took one and a half months for review, but it was rejected. They recommended a few journals with no impact factor. There were two reviewers, one said there were too many data, and the other said the article was meaningless and shouldn't be published in any journal. They criticized me without giving any useful advice. It's too bad, I wanted to scold them. They don't have the qualities that an editor should have. If they can't review properly, why waste so much time?

(0) Thank | 北风阳兰

Submission completed - Formatting check - Initial editor review - Peer review - Review completed - Final editor review - Author revisions

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Almost all freely submitted manuscripts that meet the required academic standards for publication must be returned to the authors for revisions before being published, such as compressing the length of the article, redesigning tables, improving the quality of illustrations, and limiting the use of irregular abbreviations. However, returning a manuscript to the authors for revisions does not mean that the article has been accepted. The final decision on acceptance depends on whether the authors' revisions to the critical content and expression of the article meet the requirements of the reviewers and editors. 
Materials typically returned to authors for revisions include the original manuscript, reviewers' comments, and a covering letter from the editor. Upon receiving the revised manuscript, authors should first carefully read the cover letter and reviewers' comments. They should then consider whether they can or are willing to accept the comments of the reviewers or editor and make revisions to the manuscript. The likelihood of acceptance can be seen from the response of the editor and reviewer to the revisions. Revisions should not be rushed; authors should repeatedly read and understand the reviewers' comments. They should respond to each reviewer's comments individually, specify the modifications made in the revised manuscript (page, lines), and write a letter to the editor thanking them for the suggested modifications and explaining the reasons for areas where changes were not made

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the process of recycling?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

What is the process of peer review?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

The only downside is that the annual number of posts is low, but the quality is very high. You can tell by how quickly IF has risen in the past two years

(0) Thank | 七濑东菊