Grant Editing and Evaluation
Grant Editing and Evaluation is a personalized, expert scientific consultation that seeks to elevate the benchmark for your grant proposal. You let us know your funding target, and we help you re-engineer your proposal to improve your Grant Score . Our editor and grant expert takes your proposal line-by-line to improve the language. Crucially, we rework your language and provide suggestions from a senior editor in your field (PhD or MD); each editor has a track record of successful grant submissions with major funding agencies. For flexibility, we offer two service options. The Essentials Level provides a complete, accurate language edit and focuses on a rigorous and comprehensive scientific evaluation of your proposal. The Signature Level extends this evaluation to include a full proposal rework with extensive revisions and recommendations via our Editor Commentary document, and comprehensive formatting according to your funder’s requirements. This ensures that your proposal meets high writing standards in English and that the level of the proposal’s structure and the scientific rigor are elevated. Importantly, our team focuses on the novelty and impact outlined in your proposal in order to raise your proposal above the benchmark set by the funders. The ultimate goal of Grant Evaluation and Editing is to increase your Grant Score and ensure that your submission will stand out during the selection process.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the client accepts all recommended changes and the document is still rejected solely for errors in punctuation, spelling, or grammar, then LetPub will re-edit the document for free or provide a full refund of the editing service
Shao-Qing Cai
Peking University (China)
Zhaozhou Peng
Hebei University of Science and TechnologyThank you to LetPub's editing service for helping me, who has just passed the 4th level of English, and published a Q1 paper. The successful publication of this paper would not have been possible without the editing services provided by LetPub. In addition, the polishing experts also put forward three insightful opinions on the content of the article, which is enough to prove the professional level and professional competence of the polishing experts. I hope I can write more articles and have more cooperation with LetPub in the future.
Shuhui Wang
Zhengzhou UniversityThe editing level is very professional, and the revision is very timely. At the same time, the client manager communicates very smoothly.
Ya Ma
Beijing Tongren HospitalLetPub is very good and very professional. The manuscript was returned on time and the manager Zhu is also very nice. After the article was polished, it was successfully accepted.
Hao Wang
Northwest A&F UniversityLetPub has edited many of my articles. The editors are very professional and the revisions are well done. The feedback from the editors and reviewers were very good and long-term cooperation will be considered later.
Bin Wang
Anhui University Of Science & TechnologyI have used LetPub for language editing of SCI papers three times. LetPub's paper language editing service is very professional, the revisions are very detailed, and the revised manuscripts are returned in a timely manner. At present, LetPub has become a must for Ph.D. SCI submissions in our research group.
Xin Qu
Anyang Institute of TechnologyThis is the second time I have asked LetPub to help polish the language. After the article has been edited by LetPub, the language was greatly improved. I will continue to cooperate with LetPub in the future! ! !
Dr. Engr. Muhammad Reazul Haque, MIEEE
Multimedia University (Malaysia)My scientific research paper has been accepted and published by a peer-reviewed Q1 journal indexed by WoS and Scopus after LetPub's excellent editing service. The native editor deserves five stars! I strongly recommend LetPub. Thank you!
Loading......
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.