During the first review, a targeted supplementary test was conducted based on the issues raised by the reviewers, which took half a year. It was rejected in the second review because of bad language. After polishing the language, I wrote an appeal letter. It passed the review and was accepted in the third review. It took 14 months. The mechanism of action of newly isolated starfish saponins on gliomas was done by gene chip, high-content screening, lentivirus verification, and discovery of new functional genes. Functional genes were verified on clinical samples, and the mechanism of action was linked to the cycle. The editor is objective and peaceful. The reviewer's suggestions are also very good, helping us complete a better job.

(5) Thank | 秋

During the first review, a targeted supplementary test was conducted based on the issues raised by the reviewers, which took half a year. It was rejected in the second review because of bad language. After polishing the language, I wrote an appeal letter. It passed the review and was accepted in the third review. It took 14 months. The mechanism of action of newly isolated starfish saponins on gliomas was done by gene chip, high-content screening, lentivirus verification, and discovery of functional genes. Functional genes were verified on clinical samples, and the mechanism of action was linked to the cycle. The editor is objective and peaceful. The reviewer's suggestions are also very good, helping us complete a better job.

(4) Thank | 秋

Papers in this journal have some novelty. Review is fast and the editor is very responsible. According to the citation, this year's impact factor should be 5.3-5.5.

(5) Thank | totoky

Hello, it has been 8 days since I received the notification for submission review. In the past few days, the status changed from "under consideration" to "under consideration" with an additional line above it that is blank. Does this mean that the reviewer has found a suitable external reviewer?

(0) Thank | 胸外大傻

Reject the submission.

(0) Thank | 长安清竹

Does "decision made" 8 days after submission mean the article has been sent for review, or does it indicate a rejection?

(0) Thank | 风满迎南

The decision is made to change "under consideration" to "decision made". When will the email be sent?

(0) Thank | 果汁yh

Under consideration, when will a decision be made and email notification be sent?

(0) Thank | 果汁yh

Under consideration changed to Decision Made, has the rejection email been sent?

(0) Thank | 果汁yh

How is it going now? How long will it take for the decision to be sent for external review?

(0) Thank | 燃木访松

Do you need cell identification?

(0) Thank | 梓婷小仙女

From submission to decision-making, it took 2 months, during which a review email was sent. It started as "Under consideration" and ended with "Decision Made", skipping the "Under review" status

(0) Thank | 梓婷小仙女

It is now two o'clock

(0) Thank | 深渊绮晴

Sure, thank you. I ended up putting the pictures into Word and uploading them

(0) Thank | 梓婷小仙女

I uploaded the original image in PPT, and QRT does not need the offline file, just upload the original CT value and processing process in the Excel file

(0) Thank | 长安清竹

Can you tell me how to handle the upload of my raw data, Western images, and compressed files for qPCR? The system cannot convert them to PDF, so it gets stuck and I cannot submit them

(0) Thank | 梓婷小仙女

I received a reply one month after the second review and on the second day after the third review

(0) Thank | 长安清竹

Sending an email

(0) Thank | 长安清竹

Is there an email notification for sending external review?

(0) Thank | 寂灭嘉荣

Hello, may I ask if the decision made has been rejected?

(0) Thank | 寂灭嘉荣

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Emphasis on research direction: Tumor sharing experiences: The journal has high requirements. After being rejected by c e l l r e p o r t s and o n c o g e n e, I switched to o n c o g e n e si s. One month after submission, it was sent for external review. Three months later, I received feedback for revisions. The reviewers liked my work, so I spent two months completing experiments and making revisions. After resubmitting, I received feedback for revisions one month later, requesting changes to the formatting of the bar chart axes. I made the changes and the next day, it was officially accepted. Overall, the journal does not require as much innovation as o n c o g e n e, but it demands high completeness and rigor in argumentation. There is a large workload, but it is still a good journal, worthy of the title of being a first-tier journal in China's Academy of Sciences

(0) Thank | 长安清竹

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | 寂灭嘉荣

It has been 16 days since the second review, and there is still no news. Can those who have submitted their application provide an estimate of how long the second review typically takes?

(0) Thank | 长安清竹

Can you share the submission progress? After 14 days under consideration, will it become a decision made? Will it be a rejection or will an email be sent?

(0) Thank | 四风艳庆

May I know how long it takes to receive news of the final appeal?

(0) Thank | 长安清竹