2020-07-10 Submission; 2020-09-15 Review comments returned. Two reviewers, one accepted it, and one required a minor revision; 2020-09-20 Resubmission after minor revision; 2020-10-11 Editor replied, and it was accepted.

(0) Thank | linda_lyn

The article was submitted in April, and the status was always “inviting reviewers”. After sending email to the editor to inquire, it started under review, and it was rejected in two weeks. It wastes time.

(17) Thank | 杰之痕

The speed was unexpectedly fast. Review opinions were given in one month. Revised manuscript was returned in half a month and then directly was accepted. The review speed was very fast. What a shame! The journal dropped to Q2 just after it was accepted. It ranked top in Q1 before 2019.

(5) Thank | 碳减排

Submitted in the morning of 2017.7.15, and got an email in the afternoon saying: “Thank you for sending your manuscript to Journal of CO2 Utilization .We would suggest this manuscript to be submitted to another appropriate journal because this is out-of-main scope of JCOU.” But the system showed resubmission - I was confused. 2017.7.26 resubmitted to the Journal of CO2 Utilization after revision, and explained what did for the revision. 2017.7.26 under review; 2017.8.5 ready for decision; 2017.8.7 revise. One reviewer suggested minor revision, one suggested acceptance, and the other suggested rejection. The editor asked for revision. The journal is highly efficient and has a promising future. We will submit again in the future.

(1) Thank | 597397703@qq.com

It has been several days since 3.12 was submitted to the journal. Isn't it open source? Why is it still so slow?

(0) Thank | kk5678

Rejected after submission.
The first submission was rejected. The next day, the editor-in-chief sent an email saying that the plagiarism check did not pass, and that the similarity with a JCOU article was very high. They suggested making modifications and resubmitting. However, after using iThenticate to check for plagiarism, no duplicates were found. Therefore, some changes were made to reduce the similarity rate before resubmitting.
The second submission was directly rejected, with the reason being that it did not fit the journal's theme. Although the process was fast, the reasons for rejection and the actions taken seemed a bit strange.

(0) Thank | 房山季鸟猴

5.10-submitted to journal
5.10-with editor
5.14-under review
5.16-required reviews completed
5.30-revise
6.18-with editor
6.19-under review
6.26-accept

(0) Thank | pangpang

No one has voted.

(0) Thank | Jaxon_

Open access, nobody is hiding anything.

(0) Thank | Jaxon_

Is this journal now open access? Do they charge article processing fees?

(0) Thank | 梅竹1

Why hasn't anyone commented on this journal anymore?

(0) Thank | 徐猛猛

I did not pay, I invested before the payment date, it seems to be around October 22nd of year 22. I invested in July of year 22 before, and I will not pay in November

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

Have you paid for your article yet? This Journal of CO2 Utilization. I noticed that your paper was submitted around this time last year, and only now did I realize there is a processing fee of 2900USD after the completion of the review process

(0) Thank | Sara-germany

No need, don't worry.

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

Translate the following text into English: "https://cn.service.elsevier.com/app/home/supporthub/publishing/, you can consult customer service on this website. I couldn't find any reviewers for the article, so I became the reviewer after searching for a long time."

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

The paper has finally been published! Thank you all for your help.

(1) Thank | 大脸

The text translates to: "Cej transferred over, it's been a month and a half, and I have been continuously reviewing it. How can I ask customer service about the progress?"

(0) Thank | 冉宸宝

The translation of the text into English is: "Finale, October 13th gave opinions, reviewed for three months, probably been searching for reviewers all along, two reviewers' opinions, 22 returned, accepted on November 3rd, grateful to the teacher, editor, reviewers."

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

Articles submitted on October 14th will be charged from now on, but they will become open source. I hope my article can be successfully accepted. Our team doesn't have any money, so I don't know if there will be a chance to submit articles in the future.

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

Returned for repair, waiting for the result, praying for blessings. However, starting next year, this journal will become open-source and charge fees. Now, all the journals that are submitted require payment. I wonder if this will have any impact.

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

Found the second reviewer, praying for everything to go smoothly!

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

The journal is very good. I transferred from CEJ. It took three months from submission to acceptance.

(0) Thank | 任高升

After receiving one review comment, uh, got stuck, couldn't find the second one, it has been two months already, feeling embarrassed.

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

Just ask the customer service, there is already a review comment back, waiting for the others.

(0) Thank | 小毛驴Y

If the directions are similar, it will be quick. May I ask how you determine if a reviewer has successfully reviewed a document?

(0) Thank | 奥利给！