For this kind of journal that accepts (articles on) a very narrow and specialized scope, please look at the level of energy articles in Energy & Environmental Science, and the level of water treatment articles in Water Research, and the level of atmosphere articles in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Being included in Q1, the level of the articles can be said to be "one of the best" in their direction. It can be said that all the nano articles in Q1 environmental journals (except Journal of Hazardous Materials) are better than those in Environmental Science: Nano. Tell me why how can it be included in Q1?

(37) Thank | JACS8888

As Environmental Science: Nano only accepts articles related to environmental nanomaterials, so the articles in this journal are naturally slightly better than other journals in Q2, or somewhat relatively valueless journals in Q1, such as the nano articles in Journal of Hazardous Materials, which makes you feel that Environmental Science: Nano should not be included in Q2. In fact, only in terms of the quality of environmental nanomaterials articles, Environmental Science: Nano can be said to be fair and just in Q2, and there is no problem at all. The Environmental Science: Nano only accepts nano articles, which is inferior to a large number of nano articles in related or even comprehensive journals. How can it be included in Q1?

(20) Thank | JACS8888

Jan/07/2020 submitted; April/11/2020 Minor revision; April/17/2020 revision submitted; April/21/2020 Accepted. This article submitted to EST was rejected. According to the reviewer's opinion, the DFT calculation was performed again, and then it was resubmitted to the Environmental Science Nano. Fortunately, it was accepted.

(6) Thank | Env_Phy

Submitted on 26 August 2017; Major revision on 25 October 2017; Monetary revision on 8 November 2017; Accepted on 24 November 2017. The editor was very responsible, and the reviewers were also very professional. They all provided many useful suggestions. This is a good journal. Although it is a new journal, it already has such a high ranking and IF, which has been rising for the past two years. The IF will sure keep rising when the journal becomes well-known in the future. I feel fortunate that I have a paper published in this journal.

(2) Thank | 15927134013@163.com

Published

(0) Thank | 简单的

How did it turn out, my friend?

(0) Thank | 1592

Did everyone choose single-blind or double-blind?

(0) Thank | 小菜电

How did your final turn out?

(0) Thank | 小古丽

Record the submission process: 
Submitted on November 1st 
With Editor on November 7th 
Not sure if it will be sent for review, or if it will be reviewed quickly. Let's wait and see.

(0) Thank | 十二月天

Just use a normal manuscript format, no need to format it according to publishing standards.

(0) Thank | 向往有你一方

How should I format my submission for this journal? I can't figure it out after looking at it for a while.

(0) Thank | 777.

I submitted on July 12th and it's still with the editor. It's really frustrating.

(0) Thank | qianyu

How should we handle the data availability statement required by this journal? Do we need to upload the original data?

(0) Thank | lalalalala111

It's been 18 days, why is it still "with editor"

(0) Thank | kaijie

I am also this editor

(0) Thank | 熙熙攘攘xi

Weiguo Song edits very quickly and efficiently

(0) Thank | vairwei

2024.3.5 Submit
2024.3.10 Review
2024.3.26 Major revision
2024.4.6 Revise
2024.4.9 Accept

(1) Thank | vairwei

2023.10.4 submitted
2023.11.17 in peer review
2023.12.12 minor revision
2023.12.26 revision submitted
2023.1.03 with editor
2024.01.15 with editor
It feels really slow, it takes a month and a half from submission to sending to peer review. Now it's been resubmitted for revision, and I really don't know how long this editor will take to send it for review again. I strongly do not recommend the editor Antonia Praetorius. The peer review is fast, the slow part is the editor. If you need the article urgently, I do not recommend submitting to this journal

(0) Thank | kb 毛某人

The article submitted at the beginning of November is still in the hands of the editor and has not been sent for review. What is going on

(0) Thank | 简单的

The review speed is very fast, from the first review to acceptance of revisions, it only took about a month and a half. The efficiency is very high, and ESN is well recognized in the industry. I hope the journal will continue to improve!

(18) Thank | Leon_Leo

It's relatively fast, and the content is about nano pesticides.
12.06 Submitted.
12.12 Assigned editor.
12.13 Sent for review (instant review).
1.22 During the Chinese New Year period, four weeks were given for revisions. A reviewer was assigned, major revisions were made. The editor may have felt it was not enough, so another reviewer was assigned. No objections were raised.
2.9 Major revisions completed, sent for second review.
2.24 Minor revisions.
2.25 Minor revisions completed.
2.28 Accepted.
From submission to acceptance, it took three months, which is neither fast nor slow. It was relatively lucky, and the editor, Susana Loureiro, was relatively fast in processing.

(6) Thank | 育东

Brother, don't joke around. You have only been with the editor for 10 days, while I have been with them for four months and haven't received a reply even after sending two follow-up letters.

(0) Thank | Accepted2015

May I ask how long it took for your paper to go from the initial review to the editing stage? It has been 10 days for me... and there has been no progress at all.

(12) Thank | chenyizhi

I am also this editor, I am really drunk, indeed European people's work efficiency is low, it seems like articles related to nanotoxicology are always assigned to this editor.

(0) Thank | 青鸡

The first review took a total of four months (including more than 3 months in the "with editor" status, as the editor stated that the reviewers did not submit their comments within the deadline and they had to find new reviewers). The manuscript was given major revisions and it has been 9 days since resubmission, and it is still in the review process. Is everyone here working in the field of toxicology? I was assigned to this editor automatically, and their efficiency is indeed low. All we can do is patiently wait and hope for a positive outcome for everyone.

(0) Thank | ghhiyy