This is the only worst journal. The quality of the articles is really uneven. I thought that as the page fee was so high, the review speed would be faster... But it showed a pending decision on the second day after the first review. After half a month’s decision, it became an under review. I could understand it, for being a rigorous journal. Then there was a small problem after the second review. The reviewer asked us to add a limitation (minor review), and it showed a pending decision the next day, then in half a month, it became under review again. What??? Even if you mean to be rigorous, if you can't make even the most basic decisions, why should we need you??? Just let the reviewers decide directly. Now it has been 4 months for the third review, and almost 9 months before and after... It has been in my blacklist, and I will always despise it all my life!!!

(5) Thank | 整天就想发文章

The editor-in-chief of this journal is professor Qingyi Wei of Duke University. I have submitted three times before, and have an article accepted by the top journal in the field (IF = 3.8). The under review is displayed on the second day after the submission each time. And then, it was rejected in 2 or 3 weeks and there were no external review comments. The quality of the articles in this journal is uneven, and several public database articles related to surgery have obviously fault, but they were accepted. I don’t know if it’s because they want to earn the publication fees. After all, the publication fee is very high.

(7) Thank | 无影灯下的刀尖

After submission, the manuscript became under review immediately. There was no news from the editor. After waiting for nearly a month, the manuscript was directly rejected, without any review comments. It showed reject without review. The editor's evaluation took one month. This journal is too speechless.

(5) Thank | 江浙

On the day after the submission, the status became under review. I waited a month and then send an e-mail to the journal to ask about the status of the manuscript, got a reply that they have found reviewers who agreed to review the manuscript, please be patient. Now two months have passed, and the decision is reject without review. If there was no review, why wait two months? Why did they reply that they already had reviewers? If this was reviewed by some reviewers, why is the decision rejected without review? This journal is unfriendly and I’m putting it in my blacklist.

(2) Thank | PeggyTang

Received an email in the morning on March 9th.

(0) Thank | longzg

3.7 View status pending decision.

(0) Thank | longzg

3.6 Viewing status Pending Recommendation.

(0) Thank | longzg

How long did you wait roughly behind? I have been waiting for a month after paying the fee and still haven't received the proof.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

Hello, may I ask how long does it take to receive proof after payment? It has been a month and it is still in production.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

The newly established Area 2 is keeping up with the tumor Area 3. When submitting manuscripts, you can submit them through the pre-review platform for faster external review.
On 2.8, submitted on the official pre-review platform of Wiley, said it can be sent for external review.
On 1.10, submitted on the Wiley official website, under initial checking the same day.
On 1.15, under review.
On 2.7, under decision.
On 2.11, major revisions were made, and the comments from the two reviewers were pertinent and crucial, and the suggested revisions were also very detailed.
On 2.17, revised, under initial checking the same day.
On 2.18, pending recommendation, under review the same evening.
It is estimated that it will take another month.

(0) Thank | longzg

On November 14th, I received the revision email and the status changed to major revision.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

11.14 pending decision I don't know if it has been sent for external review or not, it's been under review for 2 weeks. If it hasn't been sent for review, then it's definitely not going to work out.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

10.31 under review.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

10.23 Reminder to supplement unclear images and re-upload. undergoing initial checking on the same day.
10.25 Changed to pending editor assignment.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

Record the progress:
10.22 Submitted for review, undergoing initial checking.

(0) Thank | 可洛卡

Hello, may I ask if I received the email "accepted" yesterday, will I receive the payment email for the communication immediately?

(0) Thank | 五毒倩利

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 
Research focus: Colorectal cancer
Experience sharing: Submitted on July 25th, still not finished the first review. Have reminded several times, still no response. It's really frustrating.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

Submitted on October 4, 2024, the format was incorrect and it was sent back. Submitted again on October 6, it showed as undergoing initial checking, then changed to pending editor assignment. It remained in this status until October 15. Is this timeframe normal?

(0) Thank | 吴雯

Yes, it will be sent to the corresponding author's email.

(0) Thank | 奉天向菱

I want to ask if I should send an email to the official website's email address. I have been sending emails to the editor for several months but have not received a reply. The status is "Pending Recommendation" for a long time.

(0) Thank | Tong-HUST-ZSTU

I also sent emails to the email address displayed on the official website, but I have not received any response for several months. Do you know any other contact methods?

(0) Thank | Tong-HUST-ZSTU

It has been 24 days under review, what could be the most probable situation?

(0) Thank | yu98

How about now?

(0) Thank | Penny Harriman

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: tumor sharing of experience: submitted in early March of this year, under review on May 5.20, minor revision on May 20, two reviewers each with 3 comments on 5.28, accepted 2 days after revision. The slow stage of the journal is mainly in the processing and review stages. The comments given by the reviewers are generally positive, so there should be no external review after the revision, and it will be decided directly by the editorial department. Overall, it is still acceptable.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

Hello, I would like to ask why my application has been "undergoing initial checking" for two days now. It seems like everyone else's status changes within a day. Did everyone apply on the official website? What email did you use?

(0) Thank | yu98