It took one months in each round of review (the 1st, 2nd and 3rd). Accept as is; 5 reviewers; a certain degree of difficulty.

(0) Thank | SCI点评专家

After two rounds of major revisions/rejection and re-submission (reviewers' comments are that very critical, but we didn't understand some of them at first), our paper was finally accepted. This year, the impact factor has dropped.

(3) Thank | 突出的腰间盘

6.10 submitted to the journal
6.11 with editor
6.21 under review 5-6-1//
6.23 under review 7-2-9//
6.26 under review 0-7-6//
The group should be a little insightful, this is nothing that everyone will have.

(0) Thank | kekeshijie

How's the processing speed of this journal, bro?

(0) Thank | LE

The editor is very patient and has a very good attitude. He/she tried his/her best to help me chase after the reviewer for evaluation. The reviewer's comments were mainly about grammar issues, which were quickly fixed.

(0) Thank | gaojiaqing

I submitted two external reviews, one of which had mostly grammar issues, and the second one replied with a simple "good". After making the necessary revisions, I didn't receive any updates for a long time. I emailed twice to inquire about the status and got a quick response the second time. I made a few minor changes to the grammar and was accepted.

(0) Thank | gaojiaqing

After the resubmission, it took four months to be accepted, which was a bit slow, but everything else was fine. The reviewers were very responsible and meticulous.

(0) Thank | Liu512

Important journals in the field of crystalline silicon solar cell components, with similar impact as Solmat and PIP. In recent years, its impact factor has been surpassed by the other two journals.

(0) Thank | 235

This journal seems to have very few domestic contributors; I personally think it is impressive in the field of photovoltaics because many influential papers in crystalline silicon photovoltaics come from here; it is a very practical journal!

The submission cycle is two months; revisions take two weeks; the comments from the reviewers are still good and very unique.

(22) Thank | Liu512