2020.6.20, manuscript submitted to editorial office; 2020.7.10, major revision (3 revisions and one rejection. R1); 2020.7.28, revisions and resubmissions received by editorial office (under review); 2020.8.04 Revision (R1); 2020.8.15, revisions and resubmissions received by editorial office (under review); 2020.9.16, accept check; 2020.9.17, manuscript accepted.

(7) Thank | 小民咕咕

2019.12.17, submitted to editorial office; 2020.1.21, the comments of first round of review were returned (major revision, 3 reviewers and 15 comments. As it was Chinese New Year, the editor gave 3 months for revision); 2020.4.18, revisions and resubmissions, received by editorial office (the revised manuscript was submitted); 2020.5.8, the comments of second round of review were returned (2 reviewers had no more comments, and the other one raised 2 new questions); 2020.5.20, revisions and resubmissions, received by editorial office (the revised manuscript was submitted); 2020.6.5, the revision of repetition rate was required in third round (reducing the repetition rate); 2020.6.10 revisions and resubmissions received by editorial office (the revised manuscript was submitted); 2020.6.24, format issues, and publication agreement was revised in the fourth round; 2020.6.27, manuscript was accepted.

(8) Thank | 超级单体风暴

2019.2.20 Editor Assigned; 2019.3.4 Revision Request; 2019.5.4 Submit R1; 2019.5.24 Revision Request; 2019.6.30 Submit R2; 2019.7.2 Revision Request (plagiarism issue); 2019.7.3 Submit R3; 2019.7.5 Editor sent an email requiring us to justify the importance and innovation of this research, and give a reply on the same day; 2019.7.10 Editor requested us to modify the introduction, and clarify the importance and innovation of this research; 2019.7.11 Submit R4; 2019.7.15 Editor sent us an email to modify the format, and returned to the corrected format on the same day; 2019.7.23 Editorial office manually uploaded the correctly formatted manuscript, the editor sent us an email to log in the system to confirm whether the file is correct, reply to the confirmation email. The acceptance process is kind of trouble. It is recommended that you check the plagiarism before submission, especially the description of the experimental part should be rewritten as much as possible to prevent the similarity from being too high.

(0) Thank | clover662

My research is on visible light photocatalytic degradation of contaminants. 2017-10-6, submitted; 2017-10-22, received the review comments, four reviewers, one requested minor revision, one requested major revision, and the other two did not make any suggestions. The editor gave the decision of rejection with the possibility of re-submission. We were given 3 months (Maybe the editor gave us this much time because it looked like the requested experiments would take a long time). We took one and a half months to add new data and revise the paper. Submitted on 2017-12-5. 2017-12-26, the comments came back, three reviewers accepted the paper, but one did not. The editor gave us 30 days to revise the paper. 2018-1-8, resubmitted the revised paper after careful revision, and we had also revised the format according to the requirements of ACS. 2018-1-18, accepted. Overall, ACS is really efficient. Generally, an editor is assigned the day after submission. I wish ACS ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering gets better and better.

(13) Thank | 583350832@qq.com

The submission was made on 3.29, and as of now, the editing of Peter's license is still ongoing. It is unknown how much longer it will take for the next step. Hopefully, the rejection will come soon.

(0) Thank | Rdghhn

I seem to be the editor of this, 4.1 in hand, still not moving now, not sure if it will be submitted for review or rejected.

(0) Thank | Rdghhn

Thank you very much, I feel relieved now.

(0) Thank | KKK111

You must have submitted it for review, the "Review" column refers to the manuscript being reviewed by your supervisor, the manuscripts you submitted are all in the "Submission" column, and ACS's "in peer review" means it's definitely under review. Good luck!

(0) Thank | kkkk2

Translation: 

Inquire:
The website shows the status as "In peer review". However, it is not in the "Reviews" column in the Submissions section. Can someone clarify whether the submission is currently under review?

(0) Thank | KKK111

Has it been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | 芜湖快接收

Has it been submitted for review?

(0) Thank | 芜湖快接收

Submitted on 3.25, the current outcome is unknown.

(0) Thank | dexuan@

Have you submitted your review? The editor assigned on 2.27 has not changed status since then.

(0) Thank | 有晴

This old webpage should be viewable at: https://researcher-resources.acs.org/publish/article_manuscripts
I am also assigned to this editor, is this editor fast? The manuscript was submitted on 2025.1.29 and is currently in peer review.

(0) Thank | 青椒肉丝

The investment made on February 28th has not shown any progress yet.

(0) Thank | aandb

Is Peter License's handling of manuscripts fast?

(0) Thank | 小❤️的时间

It has been 11 days and there has been no change.

(0) Thank | Jiancheng Sun

There is still no change, it has been 11 days.

(0) Thank | Jiancheng Sun

Submitted on 2.21, it has been two weeks and it has not been reviewed yet.

(0) Thank | Aa_

It's been almost two weeks and there's been no change. How about you?

(0) Thank | 12ee3

I am also an editor. How are you doing currently?

(0) Thank | Jiancheng Sun

The allocation editor is done through emails sent by the corresponding author.

(0) Thank | qinzhao

I submitted it on the 21st, but it hasn't been reviewed yet.

(0) Thank | qinzhao

It was also said that ACS would process faster, but unexpectedly, it's almost the same. There has been no response so far.

(0) Thank | zy09

The submission made on the 22nd is still under consideration and has not been assigned an editor yet...it's getting really slow now.

(0) Thank | SYSLGJ