Any news?

(0) Thank | 回风忻忻

Has APCJP returned to SCI?

(0) Thank | 雨巷少年文山

The abstract mainly describes the purpose of the paper, the methods used, the results obtained, and their significance. The abstract should include only 4 or 5 of the most important points, results, or implications

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Be clear, accurate, concise, highlight key points, and make it easy to understand; try to use short sentences, as long sentences can lead to semantic ambiguity, but avoid repetition

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the key points to keep in mind when writing an abstract?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

How detailed should an abstract be?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

After being kicked, a general rest period of 2 years is needed. It is expected to re-enter SCI in the year after next (2016). Therefore, submissions should be made next year and the publication is expected two years later

(0) Thank | 中原兴思

Has this magazine returned to SCI this year? Can anyone help answer this question? Thank you very much!

(0) Thank | 宗室以莲

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: After reducing self-citation rate, you can quickly return to SCI

(0) Thank | 应龙嘉怡

Is it still worth submitting if it's no longer SCI?

(0) Thank | 普花可爱吗

The score is good, and the editing is very meticulous, which is very helpful for improving the paper

(0) Thank | 普花可爱吗

But the latest 2015 SCI indexed magazine is still in there? What's going on?

(0) Thank | 擒龙盼雁

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: It is confirmed that it is not SICE, check the most authoritative TOMPSON RETURNS to know

(0) Thank | 玛格丽特尼科

In the first two months, a manuscript was rejected, but now it seems lucky. The editor at the time requested three references from APJCP. A comrade on the Chuanxiang Garden posted that an article published in 2013 on APJCP actually cited over thirty self-references! It's bizarre, finally got its comeuppance

(0) Thank | Blake Augustine

It must have been added again

(0) Thank | 景逸小仙女

How did you determine that you weren't added in? I guess you were really kicked out at that time, and later you had to reapply and self-reflect, haha, and then you were added back in to maintain the reputation of the organization where this magazine is located

(0) Thank | 景逸小仙女

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: ASIAN PAC J CANCER P has just been kicked out， and the current IF is 2.514. Why is there still an IF of 2.514？

(0) Thank | Crystal Crane

Is there anything else included in this magazine besides science?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

So sad! I think there are two reasons for this: too many Chinese people posting spam; and the self-citation rate is too high. I hope to improve the quality of papers in the future, regain the favor of SCI indexing organizations, and make a comeback

(0) Thank | 小野寺娅欣

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Although it is not SCIE, if it is published before the end of July, you can still be reimbursed and receive rewards. It won't be possible if it's later

(0) Thank | 玛格丽特尼科

It's not even SCI anymore, why are so many people still submitting to this journal?

(0) Thank | 东京孤云

Woenfloang, how much time did you spend on submitting your manuscript?

(0) Thank | 江南千亦

The publication turnaround is relatively fast

(0) Thank | 金山伊可

The premise of this article is that it must have a certain level of quality

(0) Thank | 金山伊可

Should we send a reminder to ask?

(0) Thank | 江南千亦