The ones on the 1st floor, 2nd floor and 3rd floor, I want to ask you, how to prepare the supplementary information of artificial-intelligence-in-medicine? No relevant information can be found on the official website.

(4) Thank | 小let

The ones on the 1st floor and 2nd floor, I want to ask you, how to prepare the supplementary information of artificial-intelligence-in-medicine? No relevant information can be found on the official website.

(0) Thank | 小let

2.5, submission; 3.28, major revision. There were three reviewers, two of them raised few comments, and said that the article was well written. The other reviewer raised 23 comments on major revision, and said that he couldn’t understand what I wrote. It was then polished. 5.7, it was sent for the second review; 6.1, the comments were returned. It was accepted after revision; 6.3, submitted, accepted.

(21) Thank | JJJJJJL

In general, each manuscript has two reviewers, and the journal’s expectations for language are relatively high. This journal prefers to publish research on clinical decision support, clinical guidelines, clinical pathways, and auxiliary diagnosis.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

It is really slow.

(0) Thank | linpangpang

Mar 21, 2025	Under Review

(0) Thank | 是吧哈哈哈

The RRC is done, and one reviewer finished reviewing it in just one day, which feels like a tragedy.

(0) Thank | ai 在西元前

How did it turn out?

(0) Thank | 是梦雨呀

I invested in December, more than 3,300, it looks like it's still early.

(0) Thank | 是吧哈哈哈

I submitted the manuscript in November of my 24th year, with the reference number being over 2800.

(0) Thank | 汤醋里脊

You are pretty fast. What is your identification number?

(0) Thank | 是吧哈哈哈

Already under review, with 3 reviewers.

(0) Thank | 汤醋里脊

Jan 16, 2025	With Editor

(0) Thank | 是吧哈哈哈

It took 22 months from submission to rejection, because the editor could not find enough reviewers and ended up reviewing the manuscript themselves. The reviewer raised some issues with the content and authorship in the first two rounds, and then rejected the manuscript in the final round citing lack of innovation. Moreover, the feedback provided in the last round seemed like the reviewer did not read the paper carefully. Each round of review took almost six months to start, and only yielded results after reminders. Several requests to retract the submission from Elsevier were denied. It is really frustrating why they dragged the process for so long and rejected the manuscript with insufficient reasons.

(0) Thank | 三郎郎

The submission was made on October 20th, but as of November 23rd, the status has not changed. The editing efficiency is disappointing.

(0) Thank | 科研菜狗w

Don't worry, nothing has progressed so far. It has been six months and there has been no movement. Submitted for a month, waiting for editor for a month, even if it is changed to "under review" status, it is still in the editor's hands. Under review for over a month, I received an email, thinking that the first review result was out. But the editor told me that they are still looking for reviewers. (ಥ_ಥ)

(0) Thank | 汲

Too slow, it took a month to be with the editor.
Now it's been with the editor for a month, and there's no movement at all.
Submitting two or three thousand articles is not a lot, if you want to reject, just reject quickly, it's really a waste of time.

(0) Thank | 汤醋里脊

Dec 20, 2024 Submitted to Journal

(0) Thank | 是吧哈哈哈

Encouraged to withdraw, given the low overall submission volume (compared to other major medical journals, a submission volume of one or two thousand is considered quite small), submitted to the journal starting from one month, but no one responded to the reminders or emails inquiring about the status. Have already applied for withdrawal.

(0) Thank | Augus

Too slow, submitted for a month and still no response. Withdrawn the submission, be cautious when submitting to this journal recently.

(0) Thank | 科研守望者

After the first review of this journal, will the same team be invited for the second review or will new reviewers be invited?

(0) Thank | Chen.jc

Will this journal invite new reviewers after the first round of reviews is completed?

(0) Thank | Chen.jc

Will this journal invite new reviewers after the first round of review is completed?

(0) Thank | Chen.jc

My paper was rejected and resubmitted. The first time it was reviewed by two reviewers, and the second time by five reviewers. I am not sure if the five reviewers in the second round included the two from the first round.

(0) Thank | 时崎狂三

Will this journal invite new reviewers after the first round of reviews is completed?

(0) Thank | jnn8550