It took 2 months for the first review, and one month to reply to the review comments. The status was always editor assigned after the submission of the revised manuscript. I was noticed that it had been accepted in about 3 weeks.

(21) Thank | 咸鱼已经木得了

After the first review, a minor revision and a major revision was given and the editor required a major revision. It was rejected over a week after revised submission. There was only one sentence that there were many problems in the paper and it was not suitable for publication. It is not said which reviewer raised this opinion. It seemed that the manuscript was sent for review, and the editor himself didn’t want to go on. Terrible.

(3) Thank | JournalHunter

After 2 months of submission, I returned the revised manuscript, and then it has been showing editor assigned*. It has been more than 50 days now and I don’t know why.

(2) Thank | 夏雨倾城

5.11 Submission, 5.12 Editor Assigned, 5.14 Editor Assigned*, 5.17 Reviews Completed. 5.25 I emailed the editor to ask about the status, and the reply was that the manuscript is with the editor for final evaluation. I hope to get a good result.

(0) Thank | xxx

After checking, it seems that the status of "Revision technical check" did not appear. I am not sure of the reason, I hope everything goes smoothly for you! Good luck~

(0) Thank | 东东睡不醒

Hello friend! I'm sharing my submission timeline, hope it can help you!
2024.07.27 Submitted
2024.07.30 Editor Assigned
2024.07.31 Under Review
2024.08.10/08.13/08.14/08.20/10.14/10.20/10.21/10.31/11.06 Dates all changed
2024.12.08 Reviews Completed
2025.01.01 Major revision
2025.01.27 Revision Submitted
2025.01.29 Editor Assigned
2025.03.09 Accept!

(0) Thank | 东东睡不醒

Hello, OP. May I ask what is the status after your repair? Since my repair on March 1st, it has been in the "Revision technical check" status. How long will this status last? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 赵力

Accept! After 7 and a half months, I finally got hired! After the first round of major revisions and resubmissions without sending it back to the reviewers, the editor-in-chief decided to accept it directly! Thanks to the kind-hearted editor! ??

(0) Thank | 东东睡不醒

The submission was made in July 24 and the feedback was received in January 25. The revisions were sent back at the end of January, but it took two to three weeks for the editor to review it. Even after sending a reminder email, there was no response. It is really slow, so if you are in a rush to graduate, don't submit here!!!!

(0) Thank | 东东睡不醒

The date on 10/14/20/21/31 has changed, I have no idea what is going on, please give it a small fix or a big fix, pretty please!

(0) Thank | 东东睡不醒

Submitted on 7.27, under review on 7.31, with date changes on 8.10/13/14/20, still under review. Sent an email inquiry but have not received a response. In this situation, I would like to ask the experts if I should send a reminder letter.

(0) Thank | 东东睡不醒

What is the reason for not submitting for review?

(0) Thank | w_ting113

The submission to acceptance process took nearly 15 months, with five major revisions during that time. The reviewers were very thorough, pointing out many detailed issues, which were addressed and revised accordingly leading to acceptance

(0) Thank | Sand in Sea

Submitting to this journal, the editor took about 10 days to assign reviewers, skipping the peer review process and going directly to "reviews complete." It feels a bit like the DIP process, and it seems like the submission has been rejected

(0) Thank | 挣扎的蚁

Submitted at the end of May, received the first review comments on September 3, was rejected. Three reviewers provided a total of 9 comments: one gave positive feedback, one recommended major revisions, and one simply said that the article was not suitable for the journal

(0) Thank | 虾仁不眨眼

It has been two months since submission, and I still have not received any comments from the reviewers. Why is this journal being so slow now?

(0) Thank | 虾仁不眨眼

It has been over a month since submission, and it still hasn't been reviewed.

(0) Thank | BBCYZH

My first review has been submitted for a month and a half, and I still haven't received any news. It's giving me a headache.

(0) Thank | 虾仁不眨眼

The first review took about 10 days, and then it changed to "under review". After a month and a few more days, it underwent major revisions and was resubmitted. The next day, an editor was assigned. The efficiency is not bad. Generally, the time from submission to acceptance for a regular submission is 1 to 6 months, with 2 to 4 months being common.

(0) Thank | taylor1993

Has your submission been reviewed?

(0) Thank | BBCYZH

I submitted at the end of May, recommended a reviewer again on June 9th, and sent it for review on June 13th. I haven't received the review comments yet.

(0) Thank | 虾仁不眨眼

When did the original poster submit the post? I submitted mine to the editor on June 23rd, but it is still not under review, so I wanted to ask.

(0) Thank | hxysunrise

So difficult, after submitting the manuscript, the editor gave feedback on formatting changes. After revising, the editor directly requested a major revision and asked for a new recommendation for reviewers, stating that there should be no Chinese reviewers. Does anyone else have the same experience? Why would they still ask for a major revision after recommending new reviewers?

(0) Thank | 虾仁不眨眼

I have submitted it a few times, and within 10 days, it changed from "editor assigned" to "under review".

(0) Thank | taylor1993

Could someone who has voted explain it?

(0) Thank | BBCYZH