Now it has been recognized as one of the excellent domestic journals, and it is estimated that the recognition will be greatly increased. After all, even the Journal of Software has not been included. The reviewer's review speed is very fast, but the editor-in-chief 's speed is slow. If the editor-in-chief happens to check the mailbox, the results will be given quickly. It's normal to be delayed for one month if the editor-in-chief doesn't check it. There is no online publication, and if you want to find it in the DOI system, you can only wait for the official publication. It is suggested to submit if you are not anxious to get a result. The difficulty is not high, but it is slow, and there is no online publication.

(5) Thank | 老司机开车啦

This is a good SCI journal. In short, this journal is considered a good SCI journal, and the English requirements are relatively high. Long articles, theories and experiments must be thoroughly analyzed. Articles are generally not sent for review to the reviewers you recommended, and I personally think that reviewers generally are experts, such as those from the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and the Universität Hamburg in Germany. The time is generally 3–5 months, but some are longer. Welcome to discuss and exchange at 561729076.

(10) Thank | 教书育人

This is a good SCI journal, although the impact factor is not high, and the citations are not very high. Two of my articles were published here and the editor in chief is very responsible. But recently the editor-in-chief has been changed. In short, this journal is considered a good SCI journal, and the English requirements are relatively high. Long articles, theories and experiments must be thoroughly analyzed. Articles are generally not sent for review to the reviewers you recommended, and I personally think that reviewers generally are experts, such as those from the KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and the Universität Hamburg in Germany. The time is generally 3–5 months, but some are longer. Welcome to discuss and exchange at 561729076.

(7) Thank | 教书育人

My paper has been revised twice, a major revision, and then a minor revision. I’m still waiting for a decision.

(2) Thank | tfli1016@163.com

Does this format have to be in double columns?

(0) Thank | cgz

2025-01-15 Submit
2025-02-04 Major Revision
Given three months for major revision
2025-03-28 Revision Submit
2025-04-07 Accept

(0) Thank | sun2ot

Submission on March 24, 2025
Awaiting Reviewer Selection on March 25, 2025

(0) Thank | YeStar030

Submission on 23rd March 2025
Rejected on 24th March 2025
The format of this paper is not suitable for our journal.

(5) Thank | lzq

Submit manuscript on 26th August, 2024.
Editor returned on 28th August, 2024 without review, reason being that the format does not comply with the journal's guidelines, not eligible for peer review.

(0) Thank | 兰溪。

29-Nov-2023 Awaiting Admin Processing
2023-12-1 Rejected Not Sent for Review

(3) Thank | hocking

Accept as a Letter

(0) Thank | mod=profile

Awaiting AcE Decision

(0) Thank | mod=profile

A little over five months, received 5 review comments, all suggesting positive changes, made the modifications accordingly, but still got rejected by the editor. Speechless

(0) Thank | Roc丶

Awaiting Admin Final Processing for over 5 months

(0) Thank | Roc丶

Switching to another journal. Using the letter trick really tricks people into changing submissions

(0) Thank | 科研汤

Did you finally change it to a letter? I saw that a lot of them were asking to change it to a letter

(0) Thank | 让我抱一下你的腿吧

Reviewed for 5 months and then asked you to revise the letter, which is equivalent to rejection. In fact, the editor knows very well: "You waited for 5 months, it is impossible to accept a letter for publication."

(0) Thank | nobody_0

May I ask what is the current status? How long has it been awaiting AE?

(0) Thank | dawn t

I have been assigned reviewers throughout the submission period of one and a half months, and now I am awaiting reviewer scores.

(0) Thank | bling

2nd Round Review: Major Revision. Are these minor suggestions or major changes provided?

(0) Thank | mod=profile

I have also been waiting for over two months, and it is still "awaiting reviewer assignment." The reviewers have not been confirmed yet.

(0) Thank | WsWood

It has been over three months since submission. The review process has been repeatedly jumping between the editor recommending and selecting reviewers. It feels like I have already been reviewed three times. I guess it's because the previous reviewers didn't review it and they selected new reviewers.

(0) Thank | Roc丶

It has been over three months since I submitted. The review process has been repeatedly stuck between the editor's recommendation and selection of reviewers. It feels like I have already gone through three rounds of review. I guess the previous reviewers did not review it and now new reviewers are being selected.

(0) Thank | Roc丶

Already two months have passed, awaiting AE recommendation.

(0) Thank | Roc丶

I'm almost one week.

(0) Thank | 科研汤