Posted on November 23, 2022, and returned with comments from 2 reviewers on February 13, 2023. One of the reviewers paid close attention and provided very constructive suggestions for the article's structure, presentation of results, readability, and use of professional terminology. After resubmission on March 16, a suggestion for minor revisions was given on March 27, and after returning on March 28, the article was accepted on May 24. The process took a total of 7 months. The chosen reviewers were highly professional, although the editorial department was a bit slow. Overall, everything else was fine, and there is hope for an improved ranking.

(0) Thank | ZS2022

The city where I grew up is known for its beautiful scenery and friendly people. I have so many fond memories of playing in the parks and walking along the river with my friends

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please be cautious with the use of abbreviations in the title, especially for abbreviations with multiple interpretations. Limit the use of abbreviations and if necessary, provide the full name in parentheses. Use recognized abbreviations whenever possible and avoid non-standard abbreviations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What kind of titles do reviewers generally prefer?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 平原文波

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0 Experience sharing: The review time is relatively long, 3 months, with strict requirements and high level of innovation

(0) Thank | 百花腊月