Overall, a very efficient journal. Submission: 7.25; Major revision: 8.3; Revised: 8.13; Accepted: 8.27; Proof: 8.28; Published: 9.1. Two reviewers, one of them only asked some minor questions about grammar. The other reviewer was very thorough, evaluated from the study design to statistical analysis and experimental details, and gave many comments. Those suggestions did help me a lot in improving the paper. Because my experimental design is very complicated, in the past the reviewers just rejected the paper; they had no patience to understand the overall experimental design. It’s so fortunate that I had this nice reviewer who patiently gave a lot of constructive comments. My very first paper, published on the first day a new school year started! Nutrients gave me the courage to continue on the road of research. Thank you!

(2) Thank | qchen1207@163.com

Submission on 3/11
Received review results (Minor Revision) on 3/26 with comments from 3 reviewers
Resubmitted revised version on 3/28
Acceptance notification on 3/31
Received proof on 4/2
Revised version submitted in the morning of 4/3
Published online in the afternoon of 4/3

Although the review period was very short, I am grateful for the accurate comments from 2 out of the 3 reviewers. Some may criticize the publisher of this journal, but at least from my own submissions, I believe the review system is functioning properly. The Open Peer Review system is crucial for ensuring the quality of research papers, so I think it is advisable to actively utilize it to avoid unjustified criticisms.

(0) Thank | t-suzuki@wayo.ac.jp

I submitted the nutrition epidemiology section, and the entire process took nearly a month:
2.8 submit
2.10 under review
2.26 major revision
2.28 resubmit
3.1 pending editor decision
3.6 accept
3.7 online

(1) Thank | simple

Submission on December 9th
Editor suggested on December 10th to transfer to a new type of study, agreed
Under review on December 11th
Revision by 2 reviewers on December 22nd
Resubmit at 1 pm on December 27th
Accepted at 8 pm on December 27th
Proofread and submitted on December 28th
APC in the morning on December 29th
Online on the afternoon of December 29th

(0) Thank | 瑾年

Please try, may Wenchang, the God of Literature, bless us.

(0) Thank | 陈诺233

There is no reason for the table to refuse.

(0) Thank | 晨风隽美

What excuse did you give to reject it? ?

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

I am too, but I reject quickly, not bad haha.

(0) Thank | 晨风隽美

One-day rejection, is the school unit, too strange ?, is it really unfriendly to China?

(0) Thank | 晨风隽美

Where can I find the submission guidelines?

(0) Thank | 暴风平凡

It's because of the medical unit.

(0) Thank | Broderick Malthus

May I ask which section of the magazine you submitted to?

(0) Thank | mi

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 
Experience sharing: I want to ask everyone how long it usually takes for a submission to be under review? It has been 20 days and there has been no change for me.

(0) Thank | 伏象白莲

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 95.0 Experience sharing: 8.8 submission, 8.19 completion of external review, minor revisions given, 8.29 publication. It was difficult to publish the MR, as I submitted to many journals before, either rejected or couldn't find reviewers. This journal is relatively friendly to MR, and the review process is very efficient. Overall, the speed is very fast, but the editor is very anxious, only giving 5 days for revisions. During this time, I sent 3 reminder emails, but the editor was good at communication. Aside from the expensive page charges, the overall submission experience was good.

(2) Thank | 静心晓凡

After one month of review, the paper was rejected and feedback was provided for revisions. It has been resubmitted.

(0) Thank | elma09

Could you please clarify if "under review" refers to external peer review or the initial review by the journal's editors? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 岭南欣愉

Do you need the original data?

(0) Thank | Broderick Malthus

Do you need the original data for this magazine?

(0) Thank | Broderick Malthus

How have you been since then?

(0) Thank | 筑阳凝绿

How have you been doing lately?

(0) Thank | 筑阳凝绿

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 筑阳凝绿

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: dietary experience sharing: Maybe the editors I arranged are good (Chinese compatriots), they contact me on weekends and holidays haha! The reviewers they found are also very responsible, the first review is done in about half a month, and major revisions are accepted once

(0) Thank | 西风彭越

How long does it usually take for the status to change from "under review"?

(0) Thank | 己未桑

I also, it has been three days, isn't it the May Day holiday?

(0) Thank | 北国东正

It has been pending review for several days

(0) Thank | 北国千秋