The impact factor is very good, 1.373 in 2010 and 3.223 in 2011. It is very suitable for authors in China. The review speed is good; we received the review comments in about 3 weeks. Four reviewers gave many comments, which were very helpful. I carefully revised the paper according to each comment. Even my responses took 20 pages. Got accepted on the same day of my re-submission. The editor-in-chief of the journal is very kind and thorough, and revised my paper four times at the proofing step. Also, the layout of the paper at this journal is beautiful. Superb image processing techniques. In short, an awesome journal!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Be clear, accurate, concise, highlight key points, and easy to understand; use short sentences as much as possible, as long sentences may cause semantic ambiguity, but avoid repetition

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Accuracy: The abstract should accurately reflect the purpose and content of the paper; Independence: The abstract should stand alone and be independent, so explanations for special terms, all abbreviations (excluding units of measurement), and omissions should be provided; Concise and specific: Each sentence in the abstract should provide maximum information and be as concise as possible; Tense and voice: Abstracts generally use the present and past tenses, and often use the passive voice to describe factual events

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the key points to consider when writing an abstract?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

What are the general requirements for an abstract?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Submitted on January 22, 2016, major revisions on March 30, minor revisions in May, accepted around the end of May, the editor is very nice and friendly

(0) Thank | 问枫baby

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: A very good journal, mainly focusing on analysis methods in the biological field, with LC-MS/MS methods being the most common. It took about 45 days to receive revision suggestions, with four reviewers suggesting major revisions. After careful editing and detailed responses to the revision suggestions, the manuscript was resubmitted for review and accepted one month later. Overall, a great journal!

(0) Thank | 西域从玉

Very good journal, mainly the analysis method of the biological direction, LC-MS/MS method is mostly.About 45 days to modify the comments, four reviewers, overhaul, after careful modification and detailed reply to the revised proposal, return to retrial, received one month later.In short, the journal is good!

(4) Thank | hhh