From September 14, 2019 to January 13, 2020, after four months, two major revisions and one minor revision was required, with many questions asked about the reaction mechanism. The editors and reviewers were very efficient, especially the editor Martin Lemaire, every time he dealt with it quickly. The slowness was mainly because I supplemented the experiment. It's still pretty awesome.

(1) Thank | an

I submitted on February 15, 2016, and it was already under review on February 16. The status changed on February 29 to required reviews completed. Because one of the first two reviewers suggested rejection while the other suggested revision, the editor found a third reviewer. The status became under review on March 9, and the review was back on March 12. The decision was major revision. I was very happy that the editor did not send this for external review after my major revision. I was given a decision of minor revision after one week. The PDF file was filled with red texts from the editor, who must have read my paper very carefully and thoroughly. After the minor revision, the paper was accepted the next day. Really one of the fastest among Q4 journals. I write my story here to share this journal with you; not only is it very efficient, but also the editor is super thorough. I love this journal!

(1) Thank | wjwj211

The speed is fast, from submission to receiving just one month, the middle experienced a minor repair, thanks to the editor, only found a reviewer, very few opinions,I hope that the impact factor will rise.

(0) Thank | 炯男孩旺

4.4Submission, 4.19 review comments back, minor repair, very excited, returning on the 20th thought that will be received soon, the result is 5.3 or with the editor, my heart is very awkward

(0) Thank | 407925642@qq.com

Submission of a post The feeling is to be large, novelty requirements, general journal influence factors do not go, let everyone contribute low enthusiasm.

(0) Thank | tian

2012IF=1.184

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I don’t know how long it takes to receive the newsletter.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

What else?Two words shocked!Although I have written the bug to the editor, I will change it one sentence at a time. But when I received a scanned version of the pdf file that was handwritten with a red pen, I was crying out. The editor was too nice. I hope that the journal should be in this attitude.IF is able to keep rising PS. I found three reviewers and responded to the reviewer by replying to a dozen pages...Ok, attitude determines everything. Although the article is rubbish, but the attitude is really serious, so the three reviewers are very distressed. I received it...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The third part of 2012.If you don't dare to select high, let's slowly accumulate learning.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2011 IF=1.022

(0) Thank | Anonymous

3 selectd on the 7th of the month, received on April 16th, modified twice in the middle, the review speed is faster, the editor is veryResponsible, English grammar and expression of a sentence of a sentence, selectd to learn a lot of things

(0) Thank | Anonymous

third article reception, I feel good.I hope that this year IF will improve some

(0) Thank | Anonymous

and selectd one, and was rejected. (Before the brothers also selectd one, refused because the cd element is not environmentally friendly), and then changed to journal ofCoordination chemistry, after the overhaul received

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2, one of which took 2 months for review, and 15 days for the other, the editor is very responsible and feels good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Impact factor 2010: 1.166; 2009: 1.223; 2008: 0.9969

(0) Thank | Anonymous

29 select, next month 3rd for review, 8th reviewThe comments were returned and overhauled.Actually, it took only a short five days. In fact, the reviewer returned to the review comments on the 7th.There is only one reviewer, the journal itself, and no reviewers are required.

(0) Thank | Anonymous