This journal is generally very quick in reviewing a paper, and the reviewers are very professional. I submitted in last December and received the review comments for major revision in mid-February this year. Reviewer comments were 8 pages long; even the typos in the paper had been changed by the reviewers. When you revise the paper, you need to answer the reviewers’ question carefully. If a reviewer's comments is not reasonable, you can directly explain the reason. When answering the reviewers’ questions, remember to indicate the related references. It took me a month to revise the paper and it was accepted about 1 month after revision.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted on 24th November, 2011
Major revisions on 19th December, 2012
Revised manuscript returned on 8th January, 2013
Minor revisions on 11th February, 2013
Revised manuscript returned on 12th February, 2013
Accepted on 26th February, 2013

The reviewers' comments were very professional! The processing speed of the journal was average?

(0) Thank | 野盛

Start from top-tier magazines and work your way down

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is Water Publication really not worth choosing? When can we choose Water Publication for submission?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

How should article submissions be approached?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

Hello, there was no place to add the corresponding author when submitting the manuscript

(0) Thank | 紫霞怡然

Yesterday the submission displayed "admin processing," and today it shows "under review." Does this mean it's being sent for external review or that the editor is considering it? It doesn't seem like it would be reviewed this quickly

(0) Thank | 金山艳娇

Is it really so fast to be submitted for review on the second day of submission? My status has changed from "admin processing" to "under review", not sure if it has been sent for external review

(0) Thank | 金山艳娇

Do we need the WB original tape for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 水桥美华

How long does it take for the second review after this journal is revised?

(0) Thank | 北风唱月

Generally, a publication can be retrieved after three months, sometimes it may take longer

(0) Thank | 努力啊大博潇

No need for page fees, can we communicate jointly?

(0) Thank | 努力啊大博潇

Review speed: 1.0
Sharing experience: A very popular old toxicology journal, the journal of the American Society of Toxicology. The level of the journal is very good, it is one of the authoritative journals in the field of toxicology, 2nd quartile; however, the impact factor is not high, and Chinese people value the impact factor most. Even many units do not pay attention to the quartile. The research group has published three articles in this journal in the past two years. The review speed is very fast, they can provide preliminary review comments in 3 weeks, and the review comments are very detailed. Submitted on 2019-02-10, minor revision on 2019-03-06, revised on 2019-03-25, minor revision on 2019-03-29, required to add two references, revised the same day, accepted on 2019-04-07

(0) Thank | 般若北晶

Is there a page charge? Can we have co-corresponding authors?

(0) Thank | 两仪长喜

Why can't I find the papers published in this magazine on WebSci???

(0) Thank | 苍风采阳

Has anyone posted recently? It seems like the most recent posts were from last year

(0) Thank | 一条小菲菲

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted on 2019-02-10, minor revision on 2019-03-06, revised on 03-25, revised on 2019-03-29, revised on 04-01, Accepted on 2019-04-07

(0) Thank | 书生和玉

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: This magazine used to score above 5 points, but in recent years it has not performed well and has dropped back to around 4 points. The requirements for the quality of submissions are relatively high, and it is recommended to ensure that the innovation, rigor, and completeness of the submissions reach a certain level before attempting to submit. There are no specific requirements for the type of submissions, as long as they are related to toxicology

(0) Thank | 北海康成

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: There is a certain gap between the level of domestic editors and foreign editors. The selected reviewers are not professional. The comments provided do not touch on the key points. However, the quality of the journal articles is still good

(0) Thank | Tim John

Where can I find the submission guidelines? I can't find them on the homepage. Please advise

(0) Thank | 长安碧霜

Can you tell me where the submission guidelines are? Can the master provide a link? I can't find it on the homepage.
Fionaaa 2017-06-11 00:00:00 Posted: 3.1 submission. Rejected after over a month of review. Feeling down. Received three full pages of reviewer comments. The reviewer seems responsible. Another senior brother submitted in December last year. Went through several major revisions and was accepted in early April this year. Maybe my bad luck is also related to his acceptance. After all, it's the same laboratory

(0) Thank | 长安碧霜

Where can I find the submission requirements for this magazine? I've been looking on the homepage for a while and can't find it. Can someone please help me?

(0) Thank | 长安碧霜

Where can I find the submission guidelines? I searched the homepage for a long time but couldn't find it. Please enlighten me, gods

(0) Thank | 长安碧霜

After the first major revision and the second minor revision, it quickly came out and was even chosen as the cover. The questions from the experts were very detailed, with each expert's question specific to every line, requiring careful and meticulous answers. At that time, due to other matters, the revision was delayed, and an additional week was requested. It was submitted only after careful completion. The minor revision should also be taken seriously. Good luck to everyone!

(0) Thank | Victoria Grey

The first major overhaul, soon after the second minor repair, was also selected as the cover.The questions of the experts are very detailed, and each expert's questions are specific to each line, and the questions should be answered carefully and carefully.At that time, because there were other things, the modification was delayed, and the application was added for another week.Little repairs should be taken seriously.I wish you all the best!

(0) Thank | mini