Article contributed on March 25, 2011. A reply was received on March 28, saying there was a problem with the format and grammar. A revised draft was submitted on March 31. Since then, it has been under review. I waited until May 17, and then wrote a letter to the editorial office asking about the review. Their reply was that they could not find a suitable reviewer. I suggested that I recommend the reviewer. On May 19, I recommended the reviewer to the editorial department. The review comments were received on June 17, and the suggested changes made. Submitted the revised draft on July 2. On July 4, I received a reply. The research highlights were in the wrong format and should be revised. Revised the same day, on July 4.  Accepted on July 5th. From March 28th to July 5th, entire process lasted no more than 3 months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

13-May-24 Submitted to Journal
15-May-24 With Editor
23-May-24 Under Review
23-May-24 Under Review
2-Jun-24 Under Review
11-Jun-24 Revise
3-Jul-24 Revision Submitted to Journal
4-Jul-24 Under Review
7-Jul-24 Under Review
17-Jul-24 Required Reviews Completed
22-Jul-24 Revise
23-Jul-24 Revision Submitted to Journal
24-Jul-24 With Editor
24-Jul-24 Accept

(0) Thank | 匿名呵呵哒

The translation of the given text into English is as follows:

"Very fast speed
Submitted on February 28th
Major revision on March 24th, Reviewer 1 raised 3 questions, Reviewer 2 rejected, Reviewer 3 made minor revisions
Revised on April 23rd
Accepted on May 5th"

(0) Thank | 会吐泡泡的小虫

It has been nearly 3 months since the repair was sent back, but there has been no response. This journal is a bit slow.

(1) Thank | 锋舐

2021.05.27 Submitted to journal
2021.05.28 With Editor
2021.05.29 Under Review
2021.06.02 Under Review
2021.06.21 Revise - Minor Revision
2021.07.03 Revision Submitted to Journal
2021.07.04 Under Review
2021.07.05 Required Reviews Completed
2021.07.10 Accept
2021.07.11 Completed – Accept

Translation:

2021.05.27 Submitted to journal
2021.05.28 With Editor
2021.05.29 Under Review
2021.06.02 Under Review
2021.06.21 Revise - Minor Revision
2021.07.03 Revision Submitted to Journal
2021.07.04 Under Review
2021.07.05 Required Reviews Completed
2021.07.10 Accept
2021.07.11 Completed – Accept

(0) Thank | KEYAN

The review is very fast. It will be submitted on March 11th. The middle minor repair will be submitted in less than one week. After 4 days (including weekends), it will be accepted on April 16.

(0) Thank | 着急的毕业生

is by far the slowest of the journals I selectd for.It took six months from submission to rejection.After the repair, the review comments were received after the draft was submitted.The second reviewer positively commented, the editor also refused, can't you remind me?Very bullish look!Never select again!Mistakes!

(0) Thank | 123

This journal feels very good, the review speed is very fast, and the reviewer's reply is also very fast (the second three revisions are returned within one week), as long as there is some innovation, it is easy.

(0) Thank | weilai

I think this journal is good, 3 submissions, the hit rate is quite high, two of them are accepted for publication, and one is directly accepted for publication.The first-instance cycle is within two months, and the general three-month effect will have the final result.

(0) Thank | liuguanghualyx@163.com

The article that was submitted in early February 2013 was in the hands of the editor for more than 20 days at the end of February.At the beginning of May, I didn't receive any message. I sent an email asking what the reason was. A reviewer did not submit a review report. On May 22, it showed under review. So far, I have not received any news.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

for more than three months; at the beginning, the review status is from the editor to the under review, directlyEntering decision in process, this time is about a month, I feel very fast. But finally stayed in decision in process for 2 months, I don't understand, how can it be so long?So I wrote to ask the editor, the editor did not reply, 3 days later, the state became under review again, I don't even understand, what happened?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2012-03-29 Submission, the status is with editor, the date is changed once, the reason is from the editor to the deputy editor...2012-05-13 Start under review, the period date is changed several times,The specific reason is unknown. At that time, the manuscript was urgently needed, and it was urged three or four times. It was almost the same as no reminder~2012-08-15 I received the editor's letter and quoted the reviewer's opinion as follows: "Reviewer #1: The authors use state-of-The art techniques to submitigate temperature-depe

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Highlights is not clear what is the requirement, why do I say that my Highlights always have to be modified? Depressed 呐

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Status shows decisionIn process for more than a month, why don't you send me your opinion? 啥????

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for more than 10 days, why is it still with editor?!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewer #1: I think this manuscript is interesting and can be considered for publication on Solid State Communications. It would be better if the authors can further improve the English and correct some minor typos in the manuscript.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first trial decision in process has been a week, why not give the result?Other people's articles are about a month or so, as communication, it should be very fast, now I am nearly 50 days

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have seen many articles above.Overall, this journal is still good, but I can't figure out why the impact factor is so low. Is it because some editors want to process the manuscript at a slower speed?And the new 2011 has actually dropped to 1.6, which is a bit uncomfortable.A recent article on theoretical calculations, I feel that writing is very general, just a little new, I selectd for this journal, one week with editor, and started reviewing in about three days, then waiting, more than 30 daysAt that time, a letter was sent, which was answered by the staff of Aswell. The reviewer was drawn from Curry. He was usually busy and wanted to understand a class of guest words. The third day after the draft was reviewed.The comments will come back, not

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has received an article in the latest issue, but why not publish it?I don’t have a journal number yet, is it not published once a week??

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is a medium-lower in the physics class, but it is also an old-fashioned journal.Make an article for graduation.The editor is responsible and the speed is faster.I selectd twice, once about the enhancement of luminescence, directly let the deputy editor review and refused, half a month, the main reason is due to the theory is not explained clearly; once is the negative temperature quenching effect of the luminescence peak, a reviewerIn one month, I gave the content a minor repair, asked to improve the language, and accepted it in 10 days.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

3 selectd on the 13th of the month, received on May 20th, a reviewer, the middle of the day was delayed for a week, still very fast

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I feelSoon, I submitted it on January 3rd, revised back on February 23rd, received

(0) Thank | Anonymous

=.= on March 1st, submitted for a week, or with editor~The students who submitted to Plos One for a week and a half got the minor advice...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

A really bad journal, selectd at the end of July last year, has been under review, the middle editor also asked for a reviewThe manuscript, the result received a notice today, no reason.....The efficiency is too slow

(0) Thank | Anonymous

as communication, its speed is really slow.Such a general journal is not as fast as it is?However, it didn't even have speed...

(0) Thank | Anonymous