Among the top mathematics journals, the theory depth of Applied Mathematical Modelling is average, but it is definitely difficult to be published in it. The period is relatively long, and many people scold Applied Mathematical Modelling for the rejection after a long delay of their articles. The review process is very fair and just, and the difficulty is relatively high, and the overall acceptance rate is less than 15%. If major revision was required, the review comments will often make you doubt your life; they even look at the references you cited. The associate editor will also ask many difficult questions, and sometimes he is more difficult to deal with than the reviewers. The time of with editor and decision in process is usually longer than that of under review. It is worth noting that the editor-in-chief often makes decision on Wednesday night (Beijing time).

(78) Thank | 天龙九部

It was directly rejected by the editor after “with editor” for 35 days. Then it was transferred to Aerospace Science and Technology (AST). It lasted for less than three months from review to acceptance. At least from this point of view, AMM is quite good. Of course, some people may say that your manuscript is suitable for AST, but not suitable for AMM. No matter what, AST is still one of the best journals in the aerospace field. I don't know why some people belittle it. I submitted papers to AMM for 6 times, only one was accepted. AMM has a lot of haters. I think it's nothing but grape sours!!!

(12) Thank | SSSS

Personally, I think that AMM is a math-based journal that publishes low-quality research. The amount of sub-par research published recently has lowered the impact of this journal.

(1) Thank | 几何人生

Do we need a template for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 旧城

Do we need a template for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 旧城

May I ask how things are going with my submission on March 8th? It was updated with an editor on March 10th, but it is still in progress.

(0) Thank | budingfan

This journal used to be quite well recognized.

(0) Thank | ie

This year's Chinese Academy of Sciences is a bit out of line, many old-school TOP journals are no longer considered TOP.

(0) Thank | WayneTT

Not at the top anymore.

(0) Thank | aabbccdd@

I also want to know if there are any more tops.

(0) Thank | xhd

Is this journal still in the top 2 quartile?

(0) Thank | ie

Are you out yet, new district?

(0) Thank | 浩气

How did the top fall off?

(0) Thank | 温水煮青蛙

Has it been reviewed now? In what direction?

(0) Thank | 求求让我录用

It has been a week.

(0) Thank | 中国抽象院院士

1.26投 - Invested on January 26th
2.16大修 - Major renovation on February 16th
3.4返修 - Returned for repairs on March 4th
3.11接受 - Accepted on March 11th

A big thumbs up, the editors and reviewers are all super nice, thank you!!!

(0) Thank | Chang

It has been a month with the editor.

(0) Thank | Ryan9506

How did it go? Mine too.

(0) Thank | lhl123

The revised article has been accepted, and the editor did not wait for the opinion of the second expert, giving the result directly. The "With Editor" article has been with the editor for 22 days.

(0) Thank | Ryan9506

I have been waiting for 18 days with Editor for one article, and another article has been reviewed by 2 experts. The first expert's feedback was received on December 30th last year, but the second reviewer has not provided any feedback yet, despite being reminded twice. The responses from the editorial office have been mostly uniform templates. It is possible that there has been an increase in submissions to this journal recently, leading to slower processing times.

(0) Thank | Ryan9506

Reliability direction
Submitted on June 8, 2024
Under review on June 21, 2024, urging for submission, recommending reviewers, and then gathering all reviewers
Major revision on August 7, 2024
Submitted on October 25, 2024
Accepted directly by the editor on October 29, 2024.

(0) Thank | dirge117

A few days.

(0) Thank | 一枚青椒

How long have you been with the editor when you need to submit it?

(1) Thank | Ryan9506

2024-11-10 submission
2025-1-3 major revision
2025-2-7 minor revision
2025-2-18 acceptance
So efficient and fast. This is the third paper for this journal.

(0) Thank | 一枚青椒

You can refer to my submission experience: submitted for 3 months and 20 days, revised for 10 days, and accepted after 2 days of RRC.

(0) Thank | Nevereverinsomnia