Reproduction is a classic academic journal in the field of reproduction, with a high level of recognition within the industry. The journal's chosen reviewers are typically scholars from the old school, who have strict requirements for experiments and articles. The comments they provide are very professional and impartial. However, the review process is relatively slow, with the first review usually taking at least two months, and acceptance after revisions taking approximately one month.

(0) Thank | 1区期刊Nature一坨屎

Please enter your number of figures as an integer number?

(0) Thank | Truda Tate

How to resolve the issue when prompted to "Please enter your number of figures as an integer number" during submission?

(0) Thank | Truda Tate

How to solve the issue when prompted to "Please enter your number of figures as an integer number" during submission?

(0) Thank | Truda Tate

I would like to ask you, what does "PS in review status" represent? After I changed the format and submitted it immediately showed "under review", does that mean it has been sent for external review?

(0) Thank | 水月卜楷

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasized research direction: reproductive development Sharing experience: Submitted on 2021-11-21, requesting ethical review form and explanation of co-author contributions, resubmitted on 11-29. Under Review will be displayed within two days after submission. Minor revisions on 2022-1-4, raised many questions, revised on 1-9. Minor revisions again on 1-26, still reviewed by the first reviewer, revised on 1-28. Accepted on 2-4, can be found on NCBI on the same day. I feel that this journal is looking for innovation, and articles need to be written seriously. Review process is fast, editorial efficiency is high, not procrastinating. Because I am eager to graduate, I urged once during the first review, and the editor's response was timely and the attitude was good

(0) Thank | 天际麦玲

Are there only two reviewers?

(0) Thank | 控鹤冬山

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review process was very quick, with "Under Review" shown immediately after submission. The review took just over three weeks, almost one month. Both reviewers provided very fair and constructive feedback. The submission format requirements were not too complicated. Despite being rejected, I am still very grateful for the valuable comments from the reviewers

(0) Thank | 岭南若旋

Did you mention the reference format when you submitted?

(0) Thank | 韦陀俊人

Submitted on 2nd September 2018, major revision on 10th October, revised on 9th January 2019, minor revision on 5th February 2019, still the same reviewer for the first review, revised on 20th February 2019, accepted on 26th February 2019. The editors and reviewers were very responsible and provided many detailed questions and suggestions. Overall, the submission process went smoothly

(0) Thank | 五毒旭鹏

3-point edge, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase would also be nice

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

801/326=2.457

(0) Thank | 苍风绮寒

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Sharing of experience: I submitted an article to this journal in October last year, and it was not accepted until July this year. During the submission process, I received two reject & resubmit decisions, one major revision, and one minor revision before it was finally accepted. Overall, this journal is quite professional, and the reviewers I encountered were very serious. Each time I submitted, two reviewers evaluated the manuscript, and after making revisions and resubmitting, the editor would randomly assign new reviewers. My article underwent many revisions, and from the language used in the questions raised by each reviewer, I could tell that at least four people were involved in reviewing the article throughout the process. Additionally, due to the different professional backgrounds of the reviewers, the focus of the issues raised varied, but all required careful responses from the author. The article needs to be innovative, and both the logic and language of the entire text must meet high standards. I personally find it challenging to submit to this journal. SCI (2012): 3.55

(0) Thank | 龙象文勇

Submitted on 23rd September 13; rejected on 31st October 13

(0) Thank | Blithe Shelley

Bullish, if it rises again tomorrow, it may break through 3 points

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁