I have had a total of 7 or 8 articles accepted by this journal. The review efficiency is relatively fast, about 20+ days. As long as your paper has some innovative aspects, you should be okay. I wish everyone luck!

(0) Thank | wangwenmin0506@126.com

3.9 submission
3.11 with editor
There has been no response so far. Is there still hope?

(0) Thank | 莫负寒夏

This journal really gave me a chance. I didn't know anything the first time and submitted directly. After that, they gave me a major revision. After completing the major revision, there was a second round of revisions, followed by a third round of revisions. The main thing is to give a chance, because the final published manuscript is completely different from the initial submission. However, this is not a problem. They are really giving chances. The reviewers are also very good. Even if you don't do well, they won't reject you. They just give you a chance. This is how it is with the first submission, they really give you a chance. I wish the journal continued to improve and do well!

(0) Thank | 实名网友爆料

It's been two days and it's still in this state

(0) Thank | wangjl516

Too fast

(0) Thank | 化学人

6.1 submitted
6.13 under review
7.4 revise
8.10 revision submitted
8.13 accept

(0) Thank | okkkkkk23333

Thank you to editor Maurizio Peruzzini for the high efficiency. I submitted on March 4th and on the 9th, the system transferred it to editor Maurizio Peruzzini. It was sent for review on the 10th and I received a notice for major revisions on March 24th. The revised manuscript was returned on the 28th. On April 10th, I made minor revisions for two small issues, and on the 13th, I received it in the evening.

(0) Thank | Palm

has a total of seven or eight articles before and after. Overall, it is relatively smooth, and the review efficiency is relatively fast, more than 20 days.Recently, a Chinese editor, Guo-Xiu Wang, was very strange. When I chose to edit, I didn’t have this editor. I didn’t know how to send it to him. The speed of review was slow, two months, but not yet.The news, I have to miss the previous editing efficiency.In short.As long as the journal is complete and slightly innovative, it is relatively easy to accept a little right-click.I wish everyone a smooth submission.

(1) Thank | wangwenmin0506@126.com

A half-month back to the revision comments, need to add test content, the total spent almost 3 months, the revised comments are very professional

(0) Thank | yy

A very famous journal, the reviewers are very professional, and the quality control is also very strict.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is a pity!!!This journal has dropped to the 4th district.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Overall, the review of this journal is relatively slow, but my manuscript is faster, it may be luck, it is quite good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd rejected three times, received after modification according to the requirements, from the first submission to the final reception typesetting lasted 11 months, but I still want to praise, because this experience has been rejected three timesMy own delay, I received the notification in less than one month after I modified it for the fourth time. After a month or two, I typed it. If I can accept it, the journal is still very fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I feel that the review is very fast, and the request is also good.

(0) Thank | Anonymous