2020.08.07, submitted; 2020.08.24, rejected and resubmission suggested. There were not too many issues, but there were things at hand and it was therefore delayed; 2020.09.24, resubmitted; 2020.10.01, accepted. It was reviewed by the editor-in-chief all the time, not sent for external review.

(0) Thank | Daerwen

The manuscript was submitted in January and reviewer’s comment was given at the end of February. After revision, it was resubmitted in March. It was online after two days of acceptance.

(0) Thank | zluo

planta is a friendly journal. Reviewers are not harsh on the manuscript. As long as the editor and reviewer feel that the article is the right level, you will be invited to modify it. My personal opinion: the journal is known for its metabolism and physiology, and there are many articles on metabolism. Of course, plant molecular biology has made the characteristics of the journal not obvious. Most of the articles describe the physiological resistance of a gene, a transgenic plant (model plant). Compared with PCP and PMB, manuscripts submitted here are more likely to be accepted.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Later on, it was rejected.

(0) Thank | 八云

Submitted on 14th July 2024
Under Review on 16th July 2024

(0) Thank | Lois90

Hello, I would like to ask how long it takes to proofread after receiving the manuscript? Is it currently online? Thank you

(0) Thank | slby547

My article is in the status of "Required Reviews Completed", how long does it usually last?

(0) Thank | 一条小依然

After two rounds of revisions, it took a total of four to five months. However, I procrastinated for one month each time I needed to revise my own work, which wasted quite a bit of time. Overall, it was a good submission experience. It's sad to see that my submission was downgraded to Tier 3 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences

(0) Thank | 糯米丸子皮卡丘

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 了不起的Juliet

12.28 WITH EDITOR
1.18 WITH EDITOR

(0) Thank | 八云

Submitted on July 11, 2023, with one major revision in between, and accepted on December 22, 2023

(1) Thank | ybjgw

2023-7-9 Submission
2023-7-10 Editor assigned
2023-7-11 Under review (reviewers invited)
2023-7-16 Under review (reviewers agreed)
2023-7-31 Under review
2023-8-14 Revision
2023-8-27 Resubmission for revision, editor assigned, reviewers invited
2023-8-28 Under review (reviewers agreed)
2023-9-9 Required review comments
2023-9-13 Acceptance

PS: It was not easy to conduct additional experiments as suggested by the reviewers, we tactfully explained the objective difficulties and clearly outlined the limitations and value of existing results. Fortunately, the editor agreed with our perspective and the paper was smoothly accepted! It is a well-established journal with good reputation though not high impact factor

(1) Thank | yijinsha

From submission to acceptance, a little over 2 months, very fast speed, the editor is very nice, pointing out many language issues for us, a very pleasant experience!

(0) Thank | yijinsha

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Emphasized research directions: Functional analysis; Stress response; Evolution Sharing experience: Submitted on 2023-7-9 Assigned editor on 2023-7-10 Under review (reviewers invited) on 2023-7-11 Under review (reviewers agreed) on 2023-7-16 Under review on 2023-7-31 Revision on 2023-8-14 PS: We did not follow the reviewers' suggestions to conduct additional experiments, politely explained objective difficulties, and clearly stated the limitations and value of the existing results. Fortunately, the editor agreed with our views and the acceptance process went smoothly! A well-established journal with a good reputation but not a high impact factor. Submitted for revisions on 2023-8-27, editor assigned, reviewers invited. Under review (reviewers agreed) on 2023-8-28. Required reviews comments on 2023-9-9. Accepted on 2023-9-13

(0) Thank | 暴风雁云

The second review returned in 13 days and became "required reviews completed". It has been 4 days now, feeling anxious because I did not completely follow the reviewer's suggestions to conduct additional experiments. How long do you experts typically stay in this state?

(0) Thank | yijinsha

Overhaul means recommitment

(0) Thank | 龙宽九段

How long does it typically take to receive the results after the first round of revisions? Will my paper be rejected if I don't completely follow the reviewer's suggestions for additional experiments?

(0) Thank | yijinsha

Is a revision considered a major overhaul or a minor repair? Does he have the option of a major overhaul?

(0) Thank | yijinsha

May I ask which editor the original poster has chosen? I want to avoid any pitfalls.

(0) Thank | 糯米丸子皮卡丘

I replied to the editor, stating that both reviewers are experts, but they did not question my appeal and did not answer any of my questions. It was the worst submission experience, and I don't want to submit to this journal anymore. The editor is extremely irresponsible. If anyone plans to submit, I suggest avoiding this German editor.

(0) Thank | 韩韩韩512

Posting one month's worth of review comments is considered fast. However, none of the fatal comments are reasonable, and it feels like they were not carefully reviewed based on my manuscript. I can provide sufficient reasons to refute each point. I wrote an appeal letter to the editor a week ago, but I haven't received any response yet. At least, they should reply something! I guess I will have to submit to another journal again! I really hate this careless reviewer who overturned all my arguments with one point they deemed unreasonable.

(0) Thank | 韩韩韩512

You said that was plants, it seems not a magazine

(0) Thank | 岭南语海

May I ask if senior Plantas allow co-corresponding authorship? The system defaults to one corresponding author at the time of submission

(0) Thank | 留云英博

Your collaboration with the editor has been going on for months, is it completed?

(0) Thank | 上清长永

I have been “with editor” for two months

(0) Thank | 行云青亦