A PPB classic Q2 journal. The review is relatively fast. The first review took 40 days, a minor revision was suggested, and it was revised and submitted a week later, and then got accepted. The editor processed it very timely, the two reviewers were very professional, which was very useful for improving the article. It is hoped that the journal will also be ranked into Q2 in the wide subject field category, and the impact factor will continue to rise.

(8) Thank | 奋斗者007

It is a classical journal of botany in Q2. The speed was relatively fast: 07.09, submitted; 08.10, the comments were returned, and major revision was required. I replied several pages of comments one by one. There were 3 reviewers; 09.03, the revised manuscript was submitted; it was published online in October.

(4) Thank | 康桥的泉水

Excuse me, who knows that after submitting to Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, after revision according to the experts’ opinions, it has been one months, but there is no result, is it going to be rejected? This journal is not very fast either, and it has been 4 months.

(13) Thank | VAE

The review speed was faster than expected; my paper was revised twice and then accepted. I didn’t expect it to be accepted so soon. This journal is still more rigorous about the format of the paper, so make sure your paper is formatted correctly before submission.

(2) Thank | wfj0311@cjlu.edu.cn

Not bro, I have made three changes from September 24th to now and you still want me to make minor adjustments, what do you mean?

(0) Thank | 单调区间

The first review could not find a reviewer all along, and after waiting for five months, it was directly rejected but encouraged to resubmit (minor revisions, major revisions), after one month of modifications and replying to all comments, resubmission was made. Now, because of the inability to find a reviewer or the reviewer has run away, it has been more than four months and still in under review status, what should I do??? Seriously wronged, be cautious in submitting, feeling that small authors have no rights...

(0) Thank | Suerty

Submitted on January 22, 2025
Revised on February 15, 2025 by two reviewers
Revised again on March 7, 2025
Under review
Accepted on March 27, 2025
The overall process is relatively fast if the content is in accordance, with timely feedback.

(0) Thank | mmdou

Submitted on 2.19, sent for external review within a week, received external review comments back in half a month, underwent major revisions, accepted after three days of revisions, totaling one month. The editing efficiency is too high!

(0) Thank | 人迹板桥霜

After 8 months, the article was accepted directly! Amazing! The article can be submitted to higher-tier journals!

(0) Thank | yijinsha

The only change is the date, February 5th, February 10th, still under review, it has been 8 months since submission.

(0) Thank | yijinsha

Submission deadline: December 12th; Acceptance notification: February 5th.

(0) Thank | AHAHAHA*

Invested on December 12th, received on January 31st the following year.

(0) Thank | laocheng

Please translate the following paragraph into English: Thank you.

(0) Thank | laocheng

The article has been accepted. PPB has two publication modes. Initially, OA was chosen. Currently, only decisions on accepted manuscripts are being made. In the future, we may switch to a traditional subscription model. Can this be changed? Does anyone know?

(0) Thank | Wang

The dates have changed only twice, Jan 15 and Jan 20, under review. So far, it has been a full seven and a half months.

(0) Thank | yijinsha

12.14 submitted
12.16 edited
12.16 reviewed
1.10, major revisions by 2 reviewers
1.17 submitted for revisions
1.18 edited
1.19 reviewed
Until now
Feeling quite fast, hope it gets accepted

(0) Thank | laocheng

1.6 Under Review

1.6正在审查中

(0) Thank | 钶颜明公

External audit for a month, one of the reviewers' opinions are numerous and precise, clearly indicating that they are an expert in the field. This journal is quite challenging, with high standards and decent speed.

(0) Thank | 阿hao1

I want to contact the journal editor, but I couldn't find the email address. Can someone please let me know where I can find it?

(0) Thank | Wang

Receive about 6 months

(0) Thank | mxz

Submitted for your records, with editor 25.1.3.

(0) Thank | 钶颜明公

Hello, may I ask if you could please tell me how to find out how many reviewers have agreed to review the manuscript? I tried using the Elsevier WeChat mini program but couldn't find the information.

(0) Thank | 噫迯

Just one reviewer and got RRC, so awesome.

(0) Thank | Wang

I want to ask how many reviewers have been found in total. I have currently found that five reviewers have agreed to review, which is quite scary. Why are there so many people?

(0) Thank | Wang

Two rejections in a row, is this some kind of sick joke? What are the specific reasons?

(0) Thank | yijinsha