An old-brand but declining publication; the review process is formal, but it is not working well. It is of low difficulty to be accepted, but it is stronger than most open access SCI journals that with higher impact factors.

(1) Thank | 牛13科研D

Submitted on January 17, 2019; Review comments requiring a major revision, returned in June; Submitted revised draft in August; Review comments requiring a major revision, returned in December; Revised draft submitted on January 1, 2020; Accepted on Jan 3, 2020. It took more than a year to receive this good news eventually. The reviewers of this journal are comparingly responsible. All 4 reviewers are very good. The journal is also very good!

(1) Thank | 123哈哈哈

The review speed was super slow. I previously published a paper in this journal. The review process took four months. The current manuscript is still Under Review after four months of submission.

(6) Thank | tengyeer

How long does it take to see online after being hired? And is there an email for the editorial department? I want to try to follow up, it has been a year and a half since my submission, and it is still under review after minor revisions

(0) Thank | haqiux

I am the 9th floor before
The impact factor is less than zero, and the review process is extremely slow... The first review took a full 4 months, the major revisions took 16 days, and the second review took almost 2 months. Fortunately, it was accepted. I really don't recommend it if you don't have plenty of time

(0) Thank | 你好呀

The review speed is really slow, it took a whole four months for the first review. The boss has also been a reviewer, and the time given to reviewers is clearly one and a half months. The first review required major revisions, with a modification period of up to 3 months. It has been one and a half months since the second review, waiting anxiously, hoping to graduate in December. This journal is really slow at every step, the fastest journal must be mdpi

(0) Thank | 你好呀

15 The first SCI selectd on the journal, returned after April, the first time to imitate others, one of the reviewers said there was a lot of plagiarism, and the corresponding articleListed, the other two comments were fairly pertinent, and did not return later, but during the exchange with Courtney B. Burroughs, one of NCEJ's editors, Courtney edited very nice.The second 2016.06.14 mailbox submission, still the manuscript processed by Courtney, 06.20. Courtney confirmed the receipt of the manuscript, 08.21. Courtney notice that the manuscript has been sent to the external audit, telling Courtney himself as one of the reviewers; 2017.01.25 received 3The review comments agreed to accept the minor repair or answer the question, and the repair time was not confirmed. The journal generally does not require the specific time for the repair. It returns to the revised draft at 04.03, and the agreement is accepted at 04.05. During the period, the editor has made several minor errors in the revised article., 04.26 received proof, the editor made a text and sentence and reference duplicates and other modifications, great.04.27 returned proof and minor changes, and then replied to contact the publisher for amendment.

(1) Thank | xf_man@hnu.edu.cn

The editor is very careful, but the theoretical requirements are relatively high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

There are very few papers published in the journal year, only 60 papers.This will affect the speed of publication and review to a large extent.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The impact factor is not high, but the journal is very formal.The three international reviewers are very detailed and the questions are very pertinent.The review time was 2 months, and the modification and reply were made according to the revised opinions, and then received.The editor also made some text adjustments, very careful.Publishing speed is not fast, bimonthly.

(0) Thank | Anonymous