Submitted in February, it was quickly reviewed and finally accepted after minor revisions. That's great! Including the official publication, it took approximately six months in total.

(1) Thank | 苏珊娜

Start pitching from high-score magazines and work your way down

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Please ask your advisor to provide feedback based on your experiment results and the quality of your writing

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How should the process of submitting articles for publication begin?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

How many points does my essay have?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Are the Editors-in-Chief of this magazine the same as those of J of Neurosurgery?

(0) Thank | 书生妙寒

3-point margin, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0 Experience to share: Sorry, I may have misunderstood before. Our article was returned for revisions a month later (rather than accepted), and after waiting for almost two more months, we officially received the acceptance letter from the publisher today; it took a total of three months, as the editorial team at JNS is very busy; it is worth noting that they stated in the acceptance letter that the magazine has 36,000 readers every month, showing its significant impact; furthermore, each author must provide authorization and consent, making the entire publishing process very meticulous, in short, it is a magazine of extremely high quality, and we are very happy that our team could publish in it! I hope the earlier description did not cause any confusion for everyone!

(0) Thank | 震雷微澜

Professor Sanbo Shi Xiangen, admire!

(0) Thank | Ella Dennis

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 95.0 
Experience sharing: I submitted an article on skull base chordoma to the December 2016 issue of JNS Focus. It was accepted after just one month, with high praise from all three reviewers. However, some minor revisions were requested, which had to be completed within a week. We sent the revised article to the editorial department the next day and are now waiting for it to be published online

(0) Thank | 震雷微澜

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted an article in 2013, the review took three full months, and the feedback was not at the required level for publication. There were three reviewers in total, one supported publication after revision, one directly rejected, and one politely declined. The review comments were not detailed and somewhat rough

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Can we reach third place next year? Let's discuss

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁