My research direction is neuropsychopharmacology. It took two months for the first round of peer review and major revisions, and then another month for the second round before it was accepted by the journal.

(7) Thank | 贾小盼

The review speed is relatively fast at about one and a half months. It was finally accepted.

(1) Thank | qiang.wang

I didn't see any requirements for a ribbon, where did you see that?

(0) Thank | scaleslee

This journal requires full membrane, submission requirements, complete Marker is acceptable.

(0) Thank | xunei

There is nothing to translate.

(0) Thank | 岭南运盛

Has anyone submitted recently? How long does the first review usually take?

(0) Thank | 削月听菡

Is there a specific journal template for the manuscript, or should I write it myself according to the requirements?

(0) Thank | Ruby Saul

Do you have a specialized neuropharmacology journal template, or are you writing according to requirements yourself?

(0) Thank | Ruby Saul

Excuse me, how are you all doing now?

(0) Thank | zqyzqy111

It's really too slow. It has been a month already, still with the editor...

(0) Thank | xwh123

What is the format of the raw data, can the cut wb be used?

(0) Thank | 虚徒山蝶

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focus: electrophysiology 
Experience sharing: First review took two months, with one major revision and one minor revision. The editor asked for a major revision, and it took a month to collect additional data. After submission, it took another month to receive the final decision. The reviewers asked very detailed questions which felt quite challenging

(0) Thank | 四风平晓

Hello, may I ask if the WB raw data you provided is a picture of the whole board glue? I submitted mine on March 16th and it is still in the editing hands

(0) Thank | 阳飇小仙女

Journal

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Main research direction: Neurodegenerative diseases
Experience sharing: The first submission was rejected the next day because the image format did not meet the requirements. The second submission was made on 2.24 and showed "under review" on 3.7. The corresponding author submitted the document after the second submission, only the corresponding author could see the status of the second submission, and the first author could not see the submission record of the second time

(0) Thank | 淑亮酱大魔王

Model diagram is to illustrate your theoretical model. This diagram is optional for submission

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The model diagram can vividly and directly display the overall idea of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is a model diagram necessary?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

Is the model diagram helpful or harmful to reviewers' attitudes towards manuscripts?

(0) Thank | 陶宜三岁啦

Not happy now

(0) Thank | 削月利伟

How long after did you review it?

(0) Thank | 九阳阳冰

How long did you spend on the first review?

(0) Thank | 东风太枝

How long did you spend on the first review?

(0) Thank | 东风太枝

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Accepted after major revisions, lasted for 4 months, and graduated safely

(0) Thank | 削月昕妤

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 95.0 Experience sharing: It's been nearly three weeks since the major revision was submitted, but there has been no response at all

(0) Thank | 削月昕妤