2025-03-29

The Chinese Academy of Sciences has directly ruined its own credibility by favoritism, is this how support is supposed to work? I am truly speechless.

2025-03-22

Internal staff of the Chinese Academy of Sciences publish fewer journals, and in principle cannot be promoted to the top tier. The SCI journals managed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences must be upgraded to a higher tier, and those that can be promoted to the top tier have all been promoted, claiming to improve the quality of domestic journals. Journals published by universities outside the Chinese Academy of Sciences, in principle, also cannot be promoted to the top tier. In the end, it is as you see it.

2025-03-22

I really don't understand why Nature Protocols is classified as a second-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It's just too unbelievable. Even Nature's sub-journal Communication Biology, with an impact factor of only 5, is considered a top-tier journal. Its international reputation, influence, and impact factor are all lower than Nature Protocols, so why is Communication Biology a top-tier journal while Nature Protocols is second-tier, especially since they both belong to the same category of "biology"? It's amazing.

2024-10-13

I am writing the full text. Can I add a contact number to ask for advice? My number is 13844057262, thank you.

2024-10-13

I am writing the full text, can I add a contact to ask for advice? My number is 13844057262, thank you.

2017-07-16

Who can predict how many points this magazine will have next year?

2017-07-05

It has been a back and forth process for 7 months, but finally it has been accepted for publication in principle. Some revisions need to be made according to the reviewers' suggestions. The requirement is that it has already been published, and is influential. Well, there won't be any issue with duplicate publication, and one more article can be published. The impact factor is acceptable, and in the field of computational chemistry, it is considered good

2017-07-05

tossing back and forth for 7 months. Recently, it has finally been accepted in principle.Also change some things according to the reviewer's intentions.The request is something that has already been published and is influential.Yeah, there is no problem of secondary publication, you can fill an article more, the factors are still okay, and it is ok in computational chemistry.

2016-08-19

The draft paper was submitted in March. After three or four revisions, it was officially accepted in December. At the request of the editor, some experiments were carried out to apply protocols to other cell lines, supplementing the pictures of the thesis previously published by the instructor. Three reviewers reviewed the draft, and one of them dismissed it. But the editors expressed interest. The review process is meticulous and the requirements for troubleshooting are high.

2016-08-19

Submitted the paper draft in August, after three or four revisions, it was officially accepted in December. According to the editor's request, some experiments applying the protocol to other cell lines were added, and pictures from previous papers published by the supervisor were supplemented. Three reviewers reviewed the draft, one of whom was dismissive, but fortunately the editor expressed interest. The questions were detailed, and troubleshooting was required