The first review was fast, review comments were given one month later, and the second review began after revision. After both reviewers have no comments, the third review was invited and he reviewed it for another month (I do not know the specific reason). It was accepted after 10 days of minor revision, and online about one month later!

(15) Thank | 毛毛毛毛毛翔

The editor is very nice. The review period is relatively short, and the scope is suitable. For those who are eager to graduate and advance, it is a good choice.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Just now, it started to rain, and it's really annoying.

(0) Thank | piccolovegeta

I am now only one reviewer, and I have not moved at all, waiting anxiously.

(0) Thank | 在在在在_在

Which editor are you using? MaryJennifer?

(0) Thank | doctor yu

May I ask how long it will take to get results with the editor?

(0) Thank | bobo

This magazine is really terrible. I waited for two weeks to be assigned an editor, and then I was rejected for no reason. Speechless. Be cautious when submitting if you are eager to graduate.

(0) Thank | chongyin

So slow! Submitted on 1.5, passed technical review on 1.6, and still stuck at editorial assignment until now... I'm thinking about pushing them for an update!

(0) Thank | 在在在在_在

How long does peer review usually take? Is it Christmas time already?

(0) Thank | 雾都饼干

The submission was made on 11.27, but it was not assigned to an editor until 12.19. I didn't dare to rush during this period, and I don't know how long it will take from now on.

(0) Thank | 六角星

It's been half a month and still no response from the editor. Can we follow up?

(0) Thank | 阿云乐乐

Emphasis: Tumor epigenetics modification. Sharing: The article that was transferred on the 15th of last month has been in the status of allocated editor. I reminded them on the 26th, and this morning when I checked again, it showed "with editor" in the early morning, and less than half an hour later it was rejected. The rejection email didn't say anything. It's really delaying things, so those who are eager to graduate should be cautious when submitting.

(0) Thank | 未定形式

How long will this status be under review for?

(0) Thank | 雾都饼干

Yes, it means the assignment has been allocated to the editor.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

Has the editor been assigned? How long will this status last?

(0) Thank | 胤雅公子

Excuse me, has the editor been assigned? How long will it last?

(0) Thank | 胤雅公子

The magazine feels mediocre, not very friendly, and the questions raised by the reviewers are all answerable. However, the editors still rejected the submission. I'm not sure if it's because of the high volume of submissions or the unfriendliness of the magazine. Overall, it's not recommended.

(0) Thank | star

Do you need to provide three replicates for the original data?

(0) Thank | 北海谷青

How is your investment in CMBL going?

(0) Thank | 法慧痴梦

The review speed of MOL CELL BIOCHEM is considered fast, with no fixed time frame, and the review process is generally completed within 1 to 3 months.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

How are you doing? Have you been assigned to edit something?

(0) Thank | 闲丽少女

Hello, may I ask how long does it take to allocate the editor?

(0) Thank | 闲丽少女

How is it going now? Will it take long for the distribution editor?

(0) Thank | 闲丽少女

Yes, it's been a week already and there is still no progress, a bit slow.

(0) Thank | Verne Ward

Research focus: signal pathways; molecular mechanisms. Sharing experience: I haven't submitted any recently, and I feel that the process is not very fast. The editors are still assigning reviewers and I haven't been assigned yet.

(0) Thank | 闲丽少女