The manuscript was submitted on 23 Oct 2023 and there were no status updates during the period. On 4 Jan 2024, a reply of "Minor revised" was received. Two reviewers provided approximately 10 comments each, which were replied to individually and corresponding statistical verification and analysis were conducted. Perhaps the professionalism was quite high, as on 11 Jan 2024, the message displayed was "Article accepted for publication". Overall, it is a niche topic but the professionalism is unquestionable, after all, it is Elsevier with a rigorous process. Suitable for highly specialized articles

(3) Thank | suleyman1990

Well-established professional journal, with a good processing speed. The reviewers returned over 10 comments after the first round of review, requesting 2 additional experiments. Honestly informed them that it was not feasible to conduct the additional experiments, and supported the results and conclusions with literature references. Successfully persuaded the reviewers and the paper was accepted for publication without further revisions. The whole process from submission to acceptance took exactly 3 months

(0) Thank | happy_luoben

Review Speed: 2.0 Experience Sharing: Just received a submission, submitted on 9/16, received feedback on 11/17. Given three weeks for revisions, some experiments couldn't be redone. Submitted a total of six pages of materials and references. The reviewers were very satisfied, the editor was very friendly, and the processing was very quick. The second reviewer handled it as soon as it was submitted, and there were no comments from RRC or DIP

(0) Thank | 万花静欣

How many reviewers are needed for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 万花静欣

Brother, how many reviewers do we need to invite for this magazine?

(0) Thank | 万花静欣

Research focus: Fundamental research
Experience sharing: Don't submit to this journal, it was under review for two months and then they told me they couldn't find a reviewer, and ultimately rejected my submission

(0) Thank | 稻妻美偲

Have you made the investment behind you? What step are you at now?

(0) Thank | 东风谷雪磊

Have you subscribed to this magazine?

(0) Thank | 芙蓉剑博

Did you recommend reviewers at that time?

(0) Thank | 风啸玉宸

Please do not submit to this journal. I submitted to this journal, it was under review for three months, and then they told me they could not find enough reviewers and rejected my submission

(0) Thank | 通幽相勤

How long has it been under review to get the result, thank you

(0) Thank | 黑山清卓

Bro, I want to ask if I need to send a letter to the editor in advance when submitting an academic article?

(0) Thank | 风啸玉宸

Issues related to experiments and article writing

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Brother, do we need to send a letter to the editor before submitting an academic article?

(0) Thank | 风啸玉宸

You do not have to include it, but please provide convincing reasons for the reviewers and editors

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What questions do reviewers and journal editors typically ask?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

Do reviewers and editors require me to repeat experiments? Is it absolutely necessary to repeat them if they ask for it?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Did you vote, how did it go?

(0) Thank | 东风谷雪磊

Hello, may I ask how long it takes from submitting a manuscript for review, to getting it reviewed, and then accepted?

(0) Thank | 东风谷雪磊

I have submitted, but it is still under review

(0) Thank | 通幽相勤

Can we communicate, fellow traveler? Have you cast your vote?

(0) Thank | 西风寒烟

How long does the peer review process take?

(0) Thank | 通幽相勤

Has anyone invested in this recently?

(0) Thank | 仙灵雪灵

Do you know the editor's email? I have already been proofread, but I found some problems were not added

(0) Thank | 筑阳半蕾

The review process was quick, with minimal changes, and was accepted as it is

(0) Thank | 罗汉昂杰