At the end of March this year, five reviewers (really outrageous) gave suggestions for revision and resubmission. Due to the pandemic, I didn’t return to school to supplement the experiments until June. It was submitted soon after finishing the experiments; 2020.6.29, submitted to journal; 2020.8.19, major revision needed (3 reviewers. The first and third reviewers raised many comments and required major revision; the second reviewer required minor revision; the editor finally gave the suggestions for major revision. The comments were very rigorous and strict. The language, structure, data, references, etc. must be standardized and it must be treated carefully and carefully); 2020.9.19, minor revision needed (There was a characterization diagram that is not explained clearly in the article, and the language needed to be further improved); 2020.10.7, accepted directly; not sent for review again; 2020.10.16, proof; 2020.10.22, online. Although the journal has a high self-citation rate, it is still worthy of its impact factor. After all, the editors and reviewers were very serious. I am thankful for the first article published in SCI journal with such high impact factor! Best wishes!

(7) Thank | 旁观者

The journal is very good, which is equal to its impact factor! The editor basically updates the status every Friday. The first submission will be with editor (it should be an assistant editor of the journal, checking the similarity, etc.). After a week, the status becomes editor invited. We thought the editor was changed, and we were so worried. Later it became with editor (who managed our manuscript). The review cycle is a bit long for 2 months, with two reviewers, and one minor revision and one major revision were required. The review comments for the major revision should be raised by the editor, which were especially careful. One month was given for revision. We responded very carefully and wrote a full 32 pages of response to the comments (which was longer than our article). It was not accepted directly as said by the people upstairs, but was sent for review, then it got accepted in two days after submission! The editor is very responsible and serious. It is worth recommending.

(13) Thank | young

December 26, 2018, submit to the journal; February 24, 2019, major revision needed. (There were three reviewers, the first reviewer required a minor revision and the second one rejected it. The third reviewer was probably the journal’s editor, who gave a lot of comments and required major revision.) Revised submission on April 16, 2019. (It's really too busy to delay for a long time for I have to write a graduation design thesis during the time. Sorry, sorry.) The article was direct accepted on April 27, 2019, without sending for review again. May 3, 2019, proof. Thanks! This is my first article on a SCI journal! I wish the journal will be better and better!

(15) Thank | 123123123

This journal is not too demanding for innovative work, but it is very strict and demanding. My understanding is that your article can be general, but the text, structure, and data must be very standardized. Your material must be treated carefully. There are 3 reviewers. I had 2 minor repairs, 1 overhaul, and editorial advice of various kinds. The editor is very serious. The summary and introduction can all indicate a bunch of problems. I took a month to overhaul the article and resubmitted it. They accepted it.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

From submission to acceptance, it only took two months. The journal is really efficient in handling submissions.

(0) Thank | 搬砖女工人

12.12 submit
12.13 with editor
12.14 submit reject

(0) Thank | 努力搬砖

Upon checking, it turns out to be a second district...

(0) Thank | 小小牛-2

Just reviewed the draft, and they gave me 7 days to review it. After 7 days, they made a decision for major revisions. Despite not fully agreeing with the quality of the article, I still gave in and made the major revisions.

(0) Thank | 小小牛-2

Hello, may I ask what the next step is after submission under peer review, and how long it took you to reach the next step?

(0) Thank | xianghenaicha

I couldn't find it either, a single column will be fine.

(0) Thank | ETttt

Hello, I would like to ask if this journal has a Word template. I couldn't find it on the official website. Can I submit the manuscript in single column format or does it need to be changed to double column?

(0) Thank | xianghenaicha

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as the titles

(0) Thank | ETttt

How many reviewers do you have?

(0) Thank | 科研小白兔

Submitted on December 11th, revised on January 22nd, with a one-month deadline. Both the reviewers and editors provided detailed feedback! The editor even taught me how to revise the abstract! After making the changes, the language level has greatly improved. Due to not being able to make revisions during the Chinese New Year, the deadline was extended by a week. Three days after resubmitting revisions, the paper was accepted. The proofreading process took two weeks, and the attitude was great! They were also very efficient. I encourage everyone to submit their work!

(0) Thank | ETttt

If the waiting time exceeds half a month, it is better to write a reminder letter to prevent any mistakes in the handover between the editorial department and the publishing house

(0) Thank | lucky123hhh

May I ask how long it takes for you to proofread? After receiving it, can I just wait?

(0) Thank | Wzm

The submission cycle is written too little, maybe about three months.

(0) Thank | 要什么昵称

This magazine is a bit slow, so please be cautious when considering submitting. I often review and complete it within two or three days, but it takes a couple of months to see the required reviews completed. After receiving the reviewers' comments, the editor will also review the manuscript and ask very detailed questions. If you're not in a rush, you can give it a try as it helps to standardize writing.

(0) Thank | 要什么昵称

Can those who make fluorescent probes submit to this journal? Distinguished academicians and outstanding young scholars.

(0) Thank | 投搞一直被拒

It has been almost two months and I am still under.

(0) Thank | 勇敢牛牛

Excuse me, is this magazine fast? How long does it take to receive the first feedback, approximately two months?

(0) Thank | 852247316

Not bad, the suggestions for the major renovation are very professional, and many valuable questions have been raised.

(0) Thank | sss12345

Hello! I would like to ask how long it takes for the proofreading process? It has been a month since the article was submitted, and there hasn't been any other updates.

(0) Thank | lucky123hhh

May I ask how long it took for the proofreading process? The article has been submitted for a month already, and surprisingly, it still hasn't been proofread.

(0) Thank | lucky123hhh

There are five reviewers, and the review process takes one month. Please be patient and wait.

(1) Thank | 1995@ecut 666