9.17, submission; 12.2, major revision was required in the first review, and I urged once; 1.29, the revision submitted, it was always reviewer invited; 2.10, under review; 3.15, second review, I urged once again during the period; 3.18, sent to production; 3.23, online. It took a long time for inviting the reviewers. There were 3 reviewers and more than a dozen questions in the first review. 8 pages of reply were written. Fortunately, it was accepted. Good luck to other authors.

(0) Thank | JJuly

It was originally submitted to the Top journal, but it was rejected and advised transferring to this journal. Major revision was required after submission and review. The questions raised didn’t to the point. There was a reviewer who knew nothing in this field and raised a lot of extremely unprofessional questions, but I answered them one by one. About half a month after resubmission, I was told that the article should be revised again and resubmitted. One of the reviewers accepted it, and one made no comment. The previous layman rejected it and asked many foolish questions. One day later, the editor sent an email to me and said that he would like to change the decision and decided to reject it. It was a rubbish Q3 journal, but it wasted too much time, which made me unhappy. I don’t recommend you to submit to this journal unless what you have done is rubbish. The impact factor of this journal is not high, and the number of articles is not particularly large. It is estimated that it will fall below 3 in a few years.

(0) Thank | 985211

Manuscript submitted and it was with editor for one month; sent for review and it was under review for one month; then major revision required and two reviewers raised not too many issues. After one week of revision, we returned it back, and it was under review on the same day. Then it was accepted directly after one month of review. The impact factor of this journal has risen to 3.2. It is still worth to submit here.

(2) Thank | 1212121

The editor’s review of my work was very gentle. I reviewed my article and resubmitted it. It was accepted on the same day. They have more manuscripts for elemental analysis and fewer on chromatographic analysis, so the chromatographic aspect is a bit new and easy.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Accepted without any modifications.

(0) Thank | 姚蕴恒

Accepted without any modifications.

(0) Thank | 姚蕴恒

Given a few months for editing.

(0) Thank | 996LWT

I want to know how many months of repair time my family members have given, I have given two months.

(0) Thank | 996LWT

2025.2.15 submitted
2025.2.17 with editor
2025.2.18 under review
2025.3.22 accepted
Two reviewers for the first round of review. The result of the first reviewer's comments was "Congratulations! Excellent work." The second reviewer's comments were not yet received when the editor decided to accept the paper based on the first reviewer's comments.
2025.3.24 online
The editor was very efficient, taking only 40 days from submission to acceptance. Done!

(0) Thank | 姚蕴恒

It's been three weeks, not two weeks.

(0) Thank | 花生多糖

Feb. 18 submitted
Feb. 19 with editor
Mar. 13 Reject
Dragged in the editor's hands for 2 weeks, directly rejected, saying there is no novelty, too many manuscripts, the editor is Fabiana Arduini. This is not a reason, I did in situ characterization + theoretical calculation + actual samples. I don't know what the reason is, are all journals so arrogant now?

(0) Thank | 花生多糖

ACA transferred over in October 24th.
After two months of review, six reviewers made major revisions with a total of 80 questions, but most of them were easily addressed. It took three weeks to supplement data and revise the article.
One month later, minor revisions were made. Five reviewers agreed to accept the paper, while one reviewer raised some formatting issues that were addressed and resubmitted.
Thinking that the paper would be accepted directly, it was sent for review again, leaving us speechless.
It is important to be cautious when rushing the publication of an article!

(0) Thank | 1000pieces

Hello, may I ask how long after you transferred did you submit for approval? I am currently at this step as well, waiting.

(0) Thank | SAIJINWANG

How long does it usually take for the first RRC result to come out?

(0) Thank | 咘咘咘咘

The first trial has been delayed for 5 months, causing anxiety for those eager to graduate.

(0) Thank | 麦子语

Submitted a manuscript on 3-17-2024, which remained under review. Withdrawn on 11-15 and submitted to MCA on 11-17. Accepted on 1-09-2025. In the withdrawal letter, it was mentioned that the journal may not be considered in the future.

(0) Thank | JNUfeng

After being rejected by ACA, the submission was quickly resubmitted to another journal, which had a fast and efficient editorial process.

(0) Thank | 冬飞离

10.16 ACA transferred to MJ
10.17 under review invited 12 accept 2
11.01 review complete
11.01 major revision accepted, one reviewer explicitly stated lack of innovation, not suitable for publication in MJ, need to add experimental data
12.08 revision submitted, grateful for the major revision provided by the editor, made very serious modifications, reviewed a lot of literature, provided literature support for the issues raised by the rejecting reviewer, overall it was like writing a new paper.
12.09 under review invited 2 accept 1
12.24 under review, one feedback received, probably triggered by the Christmas holiday deadline
01.03 accept
Directly accepted, only after reading the feedback did I realize it was a second review by the rejecting reviewer, who mentioned that although the paper still lacked innovation, the logical flow of the paper eliminated his confusion, and the writing content made him consider it a very good paper, worthy of publication. I was truly excited to see this, knowing that my diligent and careful revisions finally moved the reviewer who wanted to reject my paper, and received full recognition. Thank you to the reviewers and the editor.

(1) Thank | bumeng

Submitted on 11.04, revised on 11.25, resubmitted on 12.16, and accepted on 12.24.

(0) Thank | fafafafa!

I made an appointment with the editor on the 11th, but the time changed on the 13th, and there has been no progress so far.

(0) Thank | 咘咘咘咘

These days have been quiet, I guess there's a chance Christmas has passed.

(0) Thank | cat#@

The submission I made on December 9th is only under review in the past two days. It's a bit slow, but we'll have to wait.

(0) Thank | 左右不为难

Why has my submission been sitting in editing for 6 days without any progress? I see other submissions being sent for review the next day, either that or they are rejected outright.

(0) Thank | 一定能发！！

Why has my editing been stagnant for 6 days without any progress?

(0) Thank | 一定能发！！

Hello, may I ask who is your editor?

(0) Thank | liuyaowen