This is a very good medical image processing journal, accepting 64 articles throughout the year.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

How long has your second review been under review?

(0) Thank | ZRS66

4.15 More than 2 reviewers accepted the review, and one person completed it.

(0) Thank | hjjiang

Mine is the same. Neither of the two reviewers accepted the manuscript in the second review. It's frustrating.

(0) Thank | 启辰

Submitted a paper on artificial intelligence, osteoporosis, machine learning, multi-head attention mechanism, cross-modal. Rejected in 12 days without being sent for review.

(0) Thank | 骨科博士

It seems that the editor is hoping for three opinions, but only two have been received. The other one has not responded despite my reminders, but eventually came back after I urged for the submission. I assume they are also waiting to see what the specific opinions are and how the editor feels about the article. It is indeed difficult to find reviewers now. One of the reviewers for my second revision has been consistently refusing to review, which is very frustrating.

(0) Thank | ZRS66

I would like to ask how many reviewers are needed for the editor to provide feedback?

(0) Thank | hjjiang

4 out of 12 have accepted the invitation to review, and 1 has already completed the review.

(0) Thank | hjjiang

Wow, time flies so fast. What topic are you?

(0) Thank | hjjiang

9/4/2025
With editor

(0) Thank | 益声

Submission Date
23 Dec 2024 Submitted
31 Jan 2025 Review Complete
7 Feb 2025 Major Revision
27 Mar 2025 Review Complete
1 Apr 2025 Decision in Progress
9 Apr 2025 Acceptance

(0) Thank | fak1er

Thank you! Good luck to us!

(0) Thank | carrey

After the major overhaul, it will take approximately two weeks for editing and processing before submission for approval.

(0) Thank | twerw

Hello, Carrey. There were no new reviewers added during the second review. The previous reviewer identified some issues after reading the complete response, so we had to make some minor revisions.

(0) Thank | twerw

The journal is in the second round of review. The reviewers are accepting manuscripts quickly. It has been a week since I invited reviewers, but none of them have accepted yet.

(0) Thank | ZRS66

Like you, the first paper I submitted before waited for 3 months for major revisions, with a lot of experimental additions suggested by the reviewers. The editor gave me 3 months to make the revisions. The second paper I submitted this time only gave me about 20 days for major revisions, but this time the reviewers did not require additional experiments. I wonder if the short timeline for revisions was because no additional experiments were needed, and this time the review process was very fast, with feedback provided in less than two months. Did you have new reviewers providing new feedback for your second round of reviews?

(0) Thank | carrey

How long after the major revision will it be submitted for review?

(0) Thank | wmqqq

After submitting my manuscript, it was immediately marked as "With editor." I will now begin documenting my submission process.

(0) Thank | 骨科博士

It has been another three weeks, only one reviewer has accepted and completed the review. Despite being urged twice by the journal manager, no new reviewers have accepted the invitation.

(0) Thank | hjjiang

Record the process of submission, it can also be considered as a contribution to the community.
2025.3.19 submitting;
2025.3.27 UR;

(0) Thank | AAAcept！

Yes, we are exactly the same, I wish us both good luck.

(0) Thank | ZRS66

Yes, in my system it shows "Accept subject Minor Revision - Second Review". Your issue shouldn't be a big deal, the first feedback is just for minor revisions.

(0) Thank | twerw

I feel like this is what Xiaoxiu meant.

(0) Thank | ZRS66

This is my first major repair, but what's strange is that major repairs are supposed to take 60 days, but they only gave me 20 days.

(0) Thank | twerw

What was your last suggestion for revision? I also received the same feedback, but it was my first time making revisions.

(0) Thank | ZRS66