From November last year to now, an article has been submitted. Two articles have been accepted successfully; one article was accepted directly after minor revision, and another one was required to make major revision (all were very objective professional opinions). I carefully revised a week, and wrote a 7-page response. It was under review again after submission. One week later, I received the accepted email before the submission system changed from EES to EM. The process of another rejected article was relatively tortuous. After the first submission, it was assigned to the editor of the corresponding direction. The result of the first review was that the language was not good enough, and it would be reconsidered after polishing. I spent money and have it polished, and resubmitted it in more than 10 days. It was rejected directly by the editor-in-chief. In general, the editor of LWT was responsible and the processing efficiency was high. The reviewers met were very professional, who didn’t delay. Judging from the number of manuscripts, the number of submissions this year has skyrocketed, reaching more than 4,000 in mid-July. It is estimated that the number of annual submissions will exceed 7,000. The requirements for the quality of articles will be higher, and it is estimate that the difficulty will increase. Come on!

(4) Thank | HHGS

2.06, submission; 3.03, major revision; 4.29, submitted after revision; 5.06, minor revision, the editor raised some comments on format; 5.15, submitted after minor revision; 5.17, accepted. The comments of major revision were returned in March. I did nothing at home during the pandemic. Until April 17, I returned to school and started to revise. I delayed it for a long time, and it generally went smoothly. I wish you all go well!

(0) Thank | 划水实验党

I was going to stop thinking about it, but the more you look at the reviewer’s comments, the more irritating you are. 2019.11.23, submission. The editors of Food Chemistry and food Research International recommended to transfer to this journal. The status of under review lasted more than 6 months, and there was no reply; 2020.06.10, I sent the email and ask the situation, and I was replied that there was only one reviewer invited, and another one had accepted the invitation; 2020.06.12, I was replied that the comments of the reviewers may be conflicting; 2020.06.13, rejected. I waited for more than 6 months. The comments of the first reviewers were pertinent, and I knew how to reply. The editor of this journal didn’t urge the reviewers daily, but he urged as soon as I asked. And then, the second reviewer gave the reply even without reviewing my introduction, which was extremely ridiculous. (The editor of) LWT, you should either contact the reviewer as soon as possible, or don't urge as soon as I urge, and the reviewer makes comments vaguely. It wasted 7 months, and the application was delayed. Fuck!

(3) Thank | 一言西早

The review process took about 9 months, with major and minor revisions needed. In the end one of the reviewers was not satisfied with our revisions and thought the paper needed to be rewritten. The article was rejected.

(0) Thank | 657444848@qq.com

Same question, have your word count exceeded? Has it passed the initial review?

(0) Thank | 秦博

Does anyone know that this journal has very strict requirements for word count? Is it necessary for research papers to be under 5500 words?

(0) Thank | xule1011

After eight months and four major revisions, I was rejected. The last two revisions were mainly rejected by the editor without even being sent for review. They kept finding faults and even asked questions that had already been addressed in the previous revision. In the end, it was rejected without any reason given. I don't understand why they made me revise so many times if they didn't want to accept it.

(0) Thank | starry bling

May I ask how many reviewers' opinions are there?

(0) Thank | monair

The difficulty level is moderate. The submission deadline is at the end of May. The first round of feedback will be received in August, and revisions should be made in September. Acceptance will be confirmed a little over half a month later.

(0) Thank | 风的速度

10.28 Submission
12.1 Major revision
1.19 Minor revision
1.26 Accept
Overall feeling that the reviewers are friendly, and the comments provided are very positive.

(0) Thank | 不浪的cell

The initial review decision is a bit slow. WE was suppressed in the first 22 days, and the 23rd day was based on the scope of the journal. It feels like a decision should be made within a week, otherwise it will waste the time of the submitting authors, especially those facing graduation.

(0) Thank | 真核生物

That is indeed quite good.

(0) Thank | 学术卡拉米

The editor may have made the decision directly without sending it for review.

(0) Thank | 学术卡拉米

Give me a thumbs up.

(0) Thank | 石大李博

Why is your return so fast? I returned it on 2.10, and it's not UR yet on 2.13?

(1) Thank | Fang

The layout fee is relatively expensive now, with an annual submission volume of around 5000.

(0) Thank | 小黑

Submitted on November 26, 2024. Under review on November 27, 2024. Major revision and reconsideration on December 20, 2024, with feedback from two reviewers - one focused on the testing methods and the other, an Indian, meticulously corrected grammar errors and greatly improved the article. Revised on January 6, 2025. Under review again on January 9, 2025. Minor Revision for Acceptance on January 19, 2025. Modifications made on January 21, 2025. Accepted on January 25, 2025. Overall, the peer review process was relatively quick, and the editorial responses were prompt.

(0) Thank | 小黑

How many submissions does this journal receive in a year, approximately?

(0) Thank | 学术卡拉米

11.13 with editor
11.17 under review
12.2 rrc
12.3 rrc
12.9 major revision
12.30 with editor
1.4 under review
1.17 accept

(0) Thank | cccccczzzzzzzz

Submission on 2024.10.19
With editor on 2024.12.02, lasted for 6 weeks, the date changed once, feeling anxious and restless, worried that if the overseas holidays fall in between, it will be delayed until after the new year. So I tried to urge the submission by replying directly to the email sent to the corresponding author (although the email was forwarded back and forth, but rest assured, someone replied after it was sent), and the customer service replied on the same day, saying that the time has indeed been long and they will help me forward it to the editor.
With editor on 2024.12.06, it seems like the editor has started reviewing.
Under review on 2024.12.07, can see that a new editor has taken over. This Portuguese editor is really responsible.
Required review completed on 2024.12.11, thank goodness, only 3 reviewers completed the review.
Major revision and reconsideration on 2024.12.14, received feedback from 3 reviewers with a total of 17 comments. Submitted on the 18th. The same day was with editor.
Under review on 2024.12.22
Required review completed on 2024.12.25, the editor is really dedicated.
Accepted on 2024.12.27. Upon receiving it, I was overjoyed.
Online on 2025.01.01.

(0) Thank | enthusiasm杨

Please log in to the author's official website submission page, where there is an option to send an email to the editor.

(0) Thank | 石大李博

How can I push for the submission? I submitted it on November 23rd last year. It is still with the editor.

(2) Thank | 曾1

I also submitted the special issue on November 23rd, but it hasn't been reviewed yet. I previously emailed the special issue editor to urge for submission and was told to contact the corresponding editor, but I don't know how to do that. How did you find the submission email for the entire article?

(0) Thank | 曾1

What should I do if the reviewer has not reviewed the manuscript for a month? The manuscript was submitted on 11.23 and is still under review as of 1.10. A reminder was sent on 1.8, but there has been no response.

(0) Thank | Fang

There are also two kind-hearted reviewers, GOD BLESS YOU.

(1) Thank | 石大李博