Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J TEST EVAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0090-3973 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1945-7553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 7.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/TESTEVAL/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/astm-jote | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | AMER SOC TESTING MATERIALS, 100 BARR HARBOR DR, W CONSHOHOCKEN, USA, PA, 19428-2959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1973 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 216 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0090-3973%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 9.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 75% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION: | Write a review |
Author: 小迷童 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-07-01 10:09:30 Everyone, have you ever encountered a situation where a manuscript was submitted for a few days and was Awaiting EIC Decision? Is the manuscript going to be rejected directly or sent to review after the editor in chief reviews it? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 道路 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-25 16:58:38 Road and railway engineering. I received the review comments in 2 months after submission. The reviewers asked many detailed questions, and it was accepted after revision. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-05-01 09:20:00 This journal is very good. It introduces a lot of new materials and new test methods. Unfortunately, ASTM's journals are generally bought less by universities and research institutions, and they are cited less. The impact factor is slightly lower. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 岩土兔 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-20 09:31:18 It has been almost two months since submission, still Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. What should I do? It hasn't been sent out yet. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ekkc Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-07 14:18:39 It's been almost three months awaiting EDIC decision... urging is also useless... Is this editor-in-chief on strike? ![]() ![]() |
Author: qianzehua Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-06 10:06:32 Has it been more than two months since the expert review was completed after the first revision, and we are still awaiting the EIC decision? ![]() ![]() |
Author: ekkc Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-25 14:00:49 It has been over two months awaiting EIC decision... ![]() ![]() |
Author: 土木牛马 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-23 15:37:46 Has your condition changed? ![]() ![]() |
Author: WL1105 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-19 09:43:20 I am also wondering if there are any other stages in between. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 阿珍学术 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-16 14:14:23 I have been waiting for almost four months now, and currently my status is "Awaiting EIC Decision", it has been one month. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 阿珍学术 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-16 14:13:12 June 29, 2024 submission Status as of November 16, 2024: Awaiting EIC Decision ![]() ![]() |
Author: 土木牛马 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-09 22:37:47 May I ask what is the next step after this status? It has been one month since my "awaiting eic decision" status, and I haven't received any updates yet. I am hesitant to follow up, as I'm worried that doing so may result in a direct rejection. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 土木牛马 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-09 22:35:50 May I ask how long your awaiting eic decision has been? It has been a month for me and I haven't received any updates. I'm afraid if I ask now, they will just reject me outright. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 土木牛马 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-09 22:34:26 Hello, may I ask how long it took for your awaiting eic decision? I have been in this status for a month already, but I am hesitant to follow up, afraid that they might directly reject my application. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 土木牛马 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-09 22:32:25 Hello, have you received the results of your article? It has been a month since my awaiting EIC decision and I still haven't heard anything. I'm afraid if I email directly, they will reject me. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研王 Subject Area: 材料科学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-27 00:00:07 Hello classmate, have you made any progress on your paper recently? I have also submitted mine over 20 days ago and am still waiting for the editor assignment... ![]() ![]() |
Author: ekkc Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-13 18:29:37 After the feedback came back, the status changed to "Awaiting EIC decision" and it has been three weeks already, no one is handling it, and no one is replying to the emails either. ![]() ![]() |
Author: longxuan Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-12 23:40:26 This journal is really rubbish. They have already accepted and received the proof, and then inexplicably claimed that there was an error in the review system and needed to have the reviewers reevaluate it. After the reevaluation, it was rejected again. However, looking at the reviewer number, the previous reviewer had asked for two rounds of revisions, and in the second round, only one formula needed to be explained, so it is impossible to be rejected again. The journal just maliciously rejected the submission because they didn't want it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 九霄惊雷 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-05-29 09:47:33 The speed is really too slow, the review expert scoring process has been dragging on for too long. I consulted the editorial department in the middle. One reviewer quickly gave his opinion, while the other reviewer dragged on for 3 months. The editorial department didn't even help to urge. It's really too slow. Originally, it was to be accepted after revision, but after the revision, it was submitted to that garbage reviewer again, and it dragged on for another 3 months ![]() ![]() |
Author: qianyu0697 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-03-14 12:22:48 Hello, I am also submitting to this journal. Can I add you as a friend to ask a few questions? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研闲人 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-26 23:43:55 Submitted on November 20th, 23. Waiting for reviewer assignment in early December. Wait for reviewer comments for about a week. Received minor revisions on January 8th. Delayed until January 25th, 24 for revision, rejected twice due to incorrect format. It was slow during the Chinese New Year, and it was not until around February 10th that it was sent to the editor. Then it was sent to the reviewer the next day, but the review was not conducted during the Chinese New Year, resulting in a two-week delay. Reviewer accepted the invitation on February 25th. Accepted on the 26th ![]() ![]() |
Author: xxxt Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-26 10:04:21 2.3 Submission 2.4 Rework on formatting issues 2.5 Wait for editorial review until around 2.12 for external review 2.25 Waiting for scoring after finding reviewers Overall speed is acceptable ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研闲人 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-05 20:10:30 Yes, I enhanced that using an online website, typically the images I draw are below 300dpi ![]() ![]() |
Author: hz2 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-03 12:44:45 The image must be larger than 3.5 inches and at least 300dpi. It will be rejected if the dpi is too low ![]() ![]() |
Author: 科研闲人 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-02 14:24:51 The waiting time for reviewers is usually around ten days, and the external review process takes about a month. The revision comments came back in January, and the review speed is considered very fast for a closed-source journal ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page |