My article is about analytical solution. It’s similar to the experience of the 17th poster. It was submitted in October, and the subject editor held it in his hands for more than a month without sending it for review. As a result, I was told that it was not innovative enough and it was rejected, and then sent me a literature in 2020, saying that my article was no different from it. How ridiculous! I read that article a long time ago. They used the finite difference method to solve nonlinear problems. What does it have to do with my analytical solution to linear problems? The editor didn't read it at all. Did you pick out two or three keywords from the manuscript and search them directly in Google Scholar, and fool me with the first result? After being rejected, I resubmitted it again at the end of November, and reiterated some innovation in the comments to editor. As a result, it was relentlessly suppressed for more than a month without being sent for review. It is estimated that it has been assigned to the same editor again. What a really bad luck... By the way, the subject editor is Patrick Sean Keogh from the University of Bath in UK. I hope you will be careful. :)

(140) Thank | TX_NUAA

Mar. 14 2019, submitted to journal; Mar. 24 2019, with editor; Apr. 22 2019, under review; Jun. 19 2019, under editor evaluation; Jun. 22 2019, major revision; Aug. 08 2019, revision submitted; Aug. 09 2019, under review; Oct. 16 2019, minor revision; Oct. 29 2019, revision submitted; Oct. 30 2019, with editor; Nov. 02 2019, accepted.

(2) Thank | Yuejian

20190417 Submission; 20190422 Editor assignations; 20190427 Reject pre review, resubmission possible; 20190502 Resubmission; 20190508 Editor assignations; 20190529 Review; 20190628 Under Editor Evaluation; 20190719 Under Editor Evaluation; 20190731 Rejection. I submitted to ultrasonic motor modeling. The editor gave several small errors including formulas in the first review. Five reviewers were assigned, and they gave about 30 comments, including the core issues of the paper. Two reviewers gave rejection comments, and it was finally rejected. The editor was serious and responsible, the review was professional and rigorous, and parts of the comments have a great effect on the article.

(3) Thank | LamYuyeung

This journal publishes a large number of papers. This journal is controlled by the British, and it places greater emphasis on theory in vibration. I have submitted to Structural Dynamics in the past. The journals, such as EESD and JFS, recently wanted me to select JSV, but my papers were unfairly rejected. The reason for the rejection was that the editor had previously published papers in the same research direction in other journals (EESD and JFS) and did not accept submissions. Very strange. This journal has a portal view.

(62) Thank | LAOLI2015

2024.12.12 submit
2024.12.17 with editor
2025.01.02 under review (two months for revision)
2025.01.25 major revision (delayed a bit due to the Spring Festival)
2025.03.23 resubmit
2025.04.06 accept

(0) Thank | li_xiao

How is Potato Brother doing? I have also been with the editor for 20 days, refreshed it, and still with the editor. I want to know what the follow-up situation is.

(0) Thank | SciVoyager

Maybe it's just that our directions are different, I met an editor who works faster.

(0) Thank | sugar不甜

How come you are so fast?

(0) Thank | 用户名被注册过啦

2025.03.04 submit
2025.03.10 with editor
2025.03.18 Under Review

(0) Thank | sugar不甜

How is Potato Brother doing? Why is he so slow this year?

(0) Thank | 用户名被注册过啦

The little brother chasing and biting is very cute.

(0) Thank | jeremyleong

Deserved it, this kind of loser magazine can never make it to the top.

(0) Thank | 匿名用户##

The page has been updated, still with editor, but the time has been updated to 3.18.

(0) Thank | 我爱吃土豆

May I ask who is the editor you are dealing with?

(0) Thank | 用户名被注册过啦

I submitted at the end of January, it's been nearly 50 days, and it's still with the editor.

(0) Thank | 不稳定选手36

Oh my god, it's been a month already, and there's still no decision on whether to submit for review? I'm worried that if we don't submit for review and get rejected directly, it would be a waste of time. This desk decision is taking forever.

(0) Thank | 我爱吃土豆

Feb 11, 2025 submission
Feb 19, 2025 with editor is too slow.

(0) Thank | 我爱吃土豆

Submitted in June 2024, accepted in January 2025. The reviewers and editors were very responsible and replied quickly. There were two reviewers in the first round, and no one went missing in the second round. The review process was also acceptable. Hopefully, this year we can make it to the top.

(0) Thank | 呵呵哒199

I feel like I should be able to make it to the top this year, and I hope I can.

(0) Thank | 呵呵哒199

How is the situation now? I am looking forward to what comes next. I have also made my decision.

(0) Thank | SCI一投就中

Can JSV still make it to the top in 2025?

(0) Thank | 呵呵哒199

I would like to ask you, after submitting, he reminded me: 1. Highlights: Please include a highlights section which should be 3-5 bullet points. Also, ensure that the character count of each bullet point is no more than 120 characters. This includes the space between the letters. Please note that if amendments can’t be made, and subject to the submission being successful, there is a chance it could be published with truncated Highlights. Therefore, we want to give you the opportunity to make the amendments now. Do you know what he means by this?

(0) Thank | SCI一投就中

Hello, I would like to ask how to check the status of a returned manuscript after editing? For example, how can I check the status of your October 31st submission? Can the first author check the status?

(0) Thank | 投稿的小新

How long does the "With Editor" of this journal take?

(0) Thank | Ali Tar

How many opinions are there in total?

(0) Thank | 呵呵哒199