2019.12.23 First submission; 2020.08.13 the manuscript was urged, and the editor replied the email on the same day; 2020.08.23 Major revision required; 2020.09.22 Revision submitted; 2020.11.12 Accepted; 2020.11.21 Online. The editor’s attitude is very good. It may take a long time to review the manuscript due to the epidemic. But the editor actively responded to the reminder in the middle, and the final result was still good. The reviewers asked ten questions, all of which were professional. The article has not officially published in the journal yet, but I will still consider JOSSE for future articles.

(7) Thank | bigcgjc

2019.10.21 Submitted to journal; 2019.10.23 format modification; 2019.10.24 Submitted to journal; 2019.10.25 Under Review; 2019.11.1 Under Review; 2019.11.2 Under Review; 2019.11.7 Under Review; 2019.11.15 Under Review; 2019.11.17 Required Reviews Completed; 2019.11.17 Under Review; 2019.11.26 Required Reviews Completed; 2019.12.8 Major revisions; 2019.12.25 Revision submitted to journal; 2019.12.26 With editor; 2019.12.26 Under Review; 2019.12.26 Required Reviews Completed; 2020.2.6 Accept.

(5) Thank | Xiaoluoji

Received: 7 May 2019; Revised: 5 August 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published online: 17 August 2019. The editor was very nice. The questions raised by the reviewers were professional. In short, the submission went smoothly. I wish the journal gets better and better.

(21) Thank | 长波小方

I have to say that this journal is quite awesome. I submitted my paper on July 17 and the technical review was returned on the same day. After the amendment was uploaded, it was sent to the editor. On July 19, it was submitted for review. Twenty days later, the results were provided. It required some revisions. The second reviewer is well known in the field. He raised a lot of questions about the impedance, and the editor didn’t understand it. Fortunately, another person knew about the impedance and gave me a lot of help. I took the modification very seriously, and then I returned it on September 10. The technical review on the 11th was short.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submit one day with editor, under review the next - is this editorial review or peer review?

(0) Thank | 一问三

Brothers, with editor one day later, it will be under review. Is this in the editing review or has it been peer reviewed?

(0) Thank | 一问三

I can only say that I empathize strongly, I am in the same situation, with the same editor. Before submission, I made two major revisions, and it was not easy to finally submit. After waiting for almost two months, I realized that this journal is really awful, with no reviewers commenting on the manuscript. Only one reviewer, who was also a weirdo, gave a major revision response and rejected the manuscript afterwards. Both the editor and the reviewer this time were mediocre and arrogant, asking some stupid questions and replying impolitely. Don't waste your time here, better submit somewhere else

(0) Thank | 兴平气和

R4, I wonder how many times this editor will let me revise, damnit

(0) Thank | 那又怎样

I am so angry that I can't sleep at night. I have to vent about this Russian editor Galina A. Tsirlina who is too strict and nitpicky. Even when the reviewers have no major comments, she has repeatedly pointed out that my experiments are insufficient, inaccurate, the content is incomplete, and the specific steps of the experiments are not clearly described, etc., and that it needs major revisions and additional experiments. She's a top-tier journal, but why is she nitpicking so much? The review process is really fast, but she's the bottleneck. It's really infuriating. A friend downstairs encountered a similar problem 20 years ago. It's really frustrating. The manuscript has already been revised three times in less than two months

(0) Thank | 那又怎样

Posted on November 26, 2022.
Minor revisions on December 23, 2022, with 11 comments provided by two reviewers.
Revised manuscript submitted on December 30, 2022.
Accepted on January 10, 2023. The editing speed is still acceptable.

(1) Thank | 阿兴

Why your paper was sent back for resubmission is because you took too long, and if it were published, it would extend the review time of the journal. By resubmitting as a new paper, the review process for your paper will be expedited to a daily basis.

(0) Thank | hejb

The review comments were provided within a month, and the article was accepted just two days after resubmission. The process was indeed very fast.

(0) Thank | 飞杨123

No layout fee required.

(0) Thank | danniel

The editing process is very fast, and the reviewers are very professional. Looking forward to the increase in the impact factor of the journal.

(0) Thank | danniel

How can I contact it to urge for the submission? Is there an email address?

(0) Thank | zzx0627

The processing is very fast, the reviewer's comments are very fair, it is a very good journal, and I hope it will continue to improve!

(0) Thank | 孟孟子旋

Hello, does this journal charge a page fee? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 李博博

After acceptance, a contract still needs to be signed. Does this mean they do not waive the publication fee? Will this journal ultimately charge a publication fee?

(0) Thank | 李博博

Journal review is fast, with feedback received in 11 days. There were four reviewers who provided around thirty to forty comments. I took almost a year to make revisions, haha. As expected, my submission was rejected. However, the editor acknowledged that I made most of the requested changes and encouraged me to resubmit. I made the revisions in three days and received acceptance in two days. I appreciate the editor's prompt and efficient handling. I hope the journal doesn't decline in quality.

(1) Thank | macyuan123

Very fast, highly efficient.

(2) Thank | 1995@ecut 666

2021.10.15 submitted
2021.10.17 with editor
2021.11.13 rejected and encouraged resubmission, a total of 5 reviewers - Some experiments were supplemented and explained (except for one reviewer who was a bit critical, the others were very fair and gave constructive feedback)
2021.12.07 revised
2021.12.16 accepted
Thank you to Editor Ezequiel Pedro Marcos Leiva for giving me the opportunity to make revisions. German journals are indeed very rigorous!

(2) Thank | 嘉嘉sunshine

Hello, does this journal charge a page fee?

(0) Thank | YY-JC

It took over five months and was rejected. There were three reviewers, one of whom was extremely unprofessional, biased, and had a serious lack of understanding in this field. The reviewers were also unfamiliar with the journal's review process and didn't even know how to view the original figures of the submitted manuscript. Each review process took about a month and a half, and the manuscript went through three rounds of review. Originally, the journal's impact factor was not high, and they nitpicked on various aspects. The reason for the final rejection was baseless. The research group's professor stated that they will never submit to this journal again.

(5) Thank | fjdfklsjie

submit to journal 03-12
under review 03-13
major revise 04-14
submit to journal 05-09
minor revise 05-14
submit to journal 05-15
accept 05-18

The given text is already in English.

(2) Thank | 山东响马

I want to say that I only spent 11 days from submission to accept, the editing is super good, and the editor is also very professional. When revise, I raised 4 questions, each question.All of them are very professional. I submitted it to 2018.11.19, received it at 2018.11.30, and modified it in the middle. On the day of 11.30, I revised the manuscript of Revise at 5 pm, with editor after two hours, and “accept” at 10:30 pm.At that time, I was so excited that I cried. Because it was the first sci in my life, I met such a good editor and reviewer of Nice. The deadline for submission was so short. The first sci was written and revised for a total of ten months.At present, I hope that the research road will become more and more smooth and better, and I will support the Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. I am very optimistic!Electrochemical old-fashioned journals, worth it!

(133) Thank | Jiahui