I have established and applied bioanalytical methods regarding partial chromatographic directions. The manuscript was submitted in April 2010, and the review comments were returned in May. After the supplementary experiment was completed and manuscript revisions were submitted, it was accepted in July, and it was published online in August (it can be downloaded to a PDF file). The overall feeling is that the review process is fast. The reviewers' opinions are relatively simple and the requirements are not harsh. It is important that your manuscript shows innovation, but there is not much emphasis on practicality. The language requirements are strict. The journal's IF has been slowly rising.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Teacher, how many reviewers have you invited? Currently, I have only received feedback from one reviewer, so I am not sure if you will invite more. Thank you.

(0) Thank | Doctor Yang

Teacher, may I ask where can you see such detailed submission records?

(0) Thank | Doctor Yang

Can any senior member help to reply to this, thank you.

(0) Thank | Doctor Yang

I submitted on 12.28 and it seems like it was under review (UR) just 3 days later. Then I saw that the system invited 17 reviewers, but only 1 accepted the invitation after 1 week. The reviewer submitted the review report after 1 week, but the status is still UR and I can't see the review report. Can I email them to inquire about this situation? Should they invite more reviewers in general?

(0) Thank | Doctor Yang

Editor: He is a Chinese but I forgot who he is.
2024.10.31 submitted to journal
2024.10.31 with editor
2024.11.07 under review (4 reviews sent out, 1 accepted)
2024.11.08 under review (3 reviews accepted)
2024.11.22 0→1
2024.12.10 Find another reviewer (suspected previous reviewer did not review, editor found another reviewer)
2024.12.23 RRC
2025.01.07 reject
One major revision and one minor revision, editor finally rejected it, saying it lacks innovation.

(0) Thank | 0ng-C

I have submitted twice but both were rejected:
① Editor: Bezhan Chankvetadze
2024.08.16 submitted to journal
2024.08.17 with editor
2024.08.22 under review
2024.08.24 sent out for review 6, accepted for review 2
2024.09.04 0→1
2024.09.09 1→2 (converted to required review complete)
2024.09.17 decision in process
2024.09.19 reject
One reviewer minor revision, one rejection, editor gave reject.

(0) Thank | 0ng-C

I have seen it late, and it has been with the editor for two weeks now.

(0) Thank | wdXYlioo

This journal is going to explode, with a backlog of year-end submissions totaling nearly 3500 articles. The editor is at least a month behind. If you want to graduate, don't submit to this journal anymore, it's too late.

(0) Thank | 大聪明～～

Can I submit to this magazine if I have done something similar?

(0) Thank | 莲花峰军

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 
Preferred research direction: Pharmacokinetics 
Experience sharing: After two major revisions and one minor revision, with four reviewers, there were many issues raised. Some of the reviewers' comments were difficult to address, but their suggestions were very constructive. Both the reviewers and editors were very diligent in their work.

(0) Thank | 行云俊风

8.8 JPBA submission, 9.14 major revisions, 9.27 revisions; 10.10 acceptance, 10.12 proofreading, 10.13 online publication

(5) Thank | dddddddd147

Which magazine did you eventually submit to?

(0) Thank | 水月笑卉

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, with titles ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 是志丹吖

Endnote citation link: https://endnote.com/wp-content/uploads/plugins/styles/J%20Pharma%20Biomed%20Analysis.ens

(0) Thank | 是志丹吖

Is it possible to use the endnote download for the quoted reference? I noticed that there is no DOI number in it, but there is a format in the author's guide, and some recent articles also have citations

(0) Thank | 龙爪奇颖

It has been 2 months since submission, and I still haven't found a reviewer. Should I continue to wait?

(0) Thank | LANCE22

Most likely yes

(0) Thank | 终幕甲子

I would like to ask, if the status changes to "decision in process" one day after submission, does it mean I will be rejected instantly?

(0) Thank | Chloe Bach

Main research direction: Analysis method experience sharing: Three reviewers, 2 minor revisions, one rejection (lack of innovation), rejection given by the editor

(0) Thank | 京城秀珍

I am currently in the same situation as you, may I ask how it turned out?

(0) Thank | 文森特黑兹利特

Are you accepting submissions for review articles?

(0) Thank | 千斤艳梅

It should be possible

(0) Thank | 卧龙新冬

Could I ask which editor you chose?

(0) Thank | 南川瑞东

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | 南川瑞东