The article about the diagnosis and prognosis of heart rate and heart rate difference and children's POTS was revised and submitted soon after first submission, and was accepted after 3 rounds of revisions. The editor was very good, and he revised the grammar by hand and sent the scanning back. Generally speaking, the requirements are still very high, and many places have been modified. The advice given is very pertinent and it is worth trying.

(4) Thank | wangshuo998

Is there more to come? Stay tuned.

(0) Thank | 北陆怡瑶

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":" respectively: Basics

(0) Thank | 北国东霞

I have learned a lot

(0) Thank | Carey Longfellow

On the third day, it shows "Decision in Process". Has it been declined?

(0) Thank | Sabina Gresham

I can't open the link, is it because of that form? The requirements during the submission process are within 200 words

(0) Thank | 玉萧春宝

Why haven't I received the delivery for external review after waiting for two weeks?

(0) Thank | 乌龙又松

Submitted on October 13th, it has been two weeks and there has been no response from the Editor. Is it likely that it has been rejected?

(0) Thank | 乌龙又松

What about the rest of it?

(0) Thank | 乌龙又松

I also want to ask, it's been 10 days, and I'm getting anxious

(0) Thank | 乌龙又松

Excuse me, where can I find this template? Have you found it? Please share

(0) Thank | 柯慧小公主

Submitted on June 8th, there was no external review process. Directly rejected on July 6th. The only status in between was "Editor assessment needed," and then it was rejected directly. The speed was too slow...!!!!!!

(2) Thank | bq888pf

How long did it take for the review process?

(0) Thank | 成双大叔

How long does it take for the review process?

(0) Thank | 成双大叔

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 成双大叔

How long is the average review period for this journal? Can someone please let me know?

(0) Thank | 成双大叔

The Editor Assessment Needed status has been ongoing for 2 weeks now, feeling a bit anxious, anyone else have a similar experience? Thank you

(0) Thank | 六合香春

The magazine provided a template link

(0) Thank | 削月映颖

Highlight the innovativeness of your research, showcasing distinctive features that set you apart from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue; what matters is having a distinction. As long as there is a distinction, it is considered innovative

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Choose the issue to be discussed in depth; discuss the selected issue from multiple perspectives in a certain order, reasoning should be based, the problem should be explained clearly and thoroughly

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is considered a deep discussion and how can we deepen the discussion?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

How to highlight the innovation of the article in the discussion?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

Can you please tell me what the reporting guideline he requested is and what I need to write? I've been looking for a while and I still don't know what to write, and there is no template

(0) Thank | 咏春洛熙

Do all authors need to confirm?

(0) Thank | 拂柳听容

I was rejected on October 20th. Don't beat around the bush, the editor was very straightforward!

(0) Thank | 水桥平萱