I have been waiting for three months for the reviewers’ comments.

(0) Thank | 范凡

One month for major revision in the first review, one month to resubmit after revisions, and over a month for acceptance in the second review. The review speed of this well-established journal has significantly improved in recent years, and acceptance rates and other indicators can be found on the official website.

(1) Thank | Silver

Offer accepted on 21st October 2024.

(0) Thank | 一颗苹果2000

Submission on July 27, 2024
Major revisions on August 12, 2024
Resubmission on September 10, 2024
Minor revisions on October 18, 2024

(0) Thank | 一颗苹果2000

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Focus on research direction: Orthopedic experience sharing: Do you accept case reports?

(0) Thank | 长安醉柳

Receiving manuscript fees

(0) Thank | 一匹小红牛

May I ask if this magazine requires a review fee?

(0) Thank | 方岳霖

As a relatively good journal in orthopedics, the following timeline is provided for reference: submission on November 29th, major revision on January 16th, revision return on February 24th, and acceptance on March 31st. Before 2021, the journal was classified as a 2nd tier (zone) in orthopedics. However, starting from 2022, it has been reclassified as a 3rd tier (zone) by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, with an impact factor of 3.494. Although it is now a 3rd tier journal, it is still recommended for colleagues who conduct experiments with a funding investment of 50,000 or more to submit their excellent articles here.

(0) Thank | 骨科青年

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Focus research direction: Biomechanics; Orthopedic experience sharing: Submitted on November 29, revised on January 16, revised again on February 24, and accepted on March 31. Questions were raised by two reviewers, mainly involving modifications to certain discussions. When writing articles, it is important to be specific, logical, and to resolve any potential experimental method issues. The review fee is $50, and the article layout fee can be open access (approximately $3600) or subscription-based (free

(0) Thank | 五河向雁

Posted on July 31, 2021, major renovation on December 4th; returned on January 18, 2022, minor repair on February 21; returned on March 7, notified acceptance on the 22nd.

(0) Thank | meng

The journal is a well-established one with a longer review cycle.

(0) Thank | meng

For example, the experimental techniques of PCR, Western blot, and the usage methods of some instruments

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

If the method is described for the first time, it should be detailed to demonstrate the rigor and thorough consideration of the research work; however, if the method has already been described in a previously published paper, a brief description is sufficient with a reference to the original publication

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When should the methods section be detailed and when can it be abbreviated?

(0) Thank | 北国博达

What is the standard operating procedure for laboratory use?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

Old-established journal, with a good reputation, but a low impact factor. The review speed is average, I happened to submit it around Christmas, so it was relatively slow.

(0) Thank | Silly74559

Do you accept cases?

(0) Thank | 犬走安兴

Submitted on 6.15, it has been exactly three months today. There have been several reviewers changed during the process, feeling quite nervous. I really hope it won't be rejected again

(0) Thank | 东风向笛

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: $50, then under review the next day, happily waiting, rejected without review after 18 days, feeling confused, submit cautiously, submit carefully

(0) Thank | 拂柳金枝

After the first review lasting for 3 months with three reviewers raising different questions, the paper was accepted for publication without further revisions after addressing them

(0) Thank | 灵犀逸龙

First trial for 3 months, 3 reviewers asked different questions, after serious answer, after 2 months of the second trial directly received

(0) Thank | hover

After the first review which took 3 months, three reviewers raised different questions. After carefully addressing these questions, the paper was accepted without further revisions after the second review which took 2 months

(0) Thank | 四风玉泽

has been rejected for 2 weeks, and the editor said that my content is not very innovative, lacks influence, and does not go deep.

(0) Thank | dark robe wizard

Rejected after 2 weeks of submission, the editor said my content lacks originality, impact, and depth

(0) Thank | 法慧才良

What is the situation behind this? jvlangtaotian 2016-10-21 published:SCI(2015):2.807 SCI(2014):2.986 The next day it is already under review. Does this mean it is being sent for external review?

(0) Thank | 是康时吖