8.13 submitted to OL. Five days later the deputy editor responded, rejected it but recommended to transfer to JOC; 8.26 submitted to JOC as an article through the manuscript transfer, during which the compound checklist was added; 9.1 deputy editor assigned; 9.25 they replied as “reject & resubmit”, with two major revisions and one suggestion of transferring and publishing it elsewhere; 11.5 Resubmitted after the experiment was supplemented and manuscript modified; 12.3 one reviewer accepted it, one required a minor revision, another one still rejected it because of novelty issues, and the editor raised comments for revision to be made within one month; 12.10 revision submitted; 12.15 revision required; 12.16 revision submitted; 12.22 accept. It took a total of 4 months. This is my first research paper. Although the process is arduous, the result is still good. In general, JOC is very rigorous, the opinions for revision are very professional, and it requires a certain degree of novelty for the systematic characterization of compounds.

(5) Thank | baoandabao

I submitted the manuscript to Organic Letters (OL) on April 4. The mail returned on April 22, and the manuscript was rejected for insufficient data. The editor suggested transferring it to the Journal of Organic Chemistry (JOC) as note. It was resubmitted on June 1 after revision. It was with editor on June 7. The results returned on July 16, there were three minor revisions and one major revision, and I was invited to submit the cover art. It was submitted after revision on August 8. It was accepted on August 21. A relatively novel skeleton containing CF3 was composed by using a traditional method. The reviews of OL and JOC were very serious; a lot of constructive suggestions were given. Because the synthesis of derivatives was difficult, there were only 16 examples listed, which may not meet the OL standard (I personally felt that at least 20 examples should be listed, and the yield should also be high). It was recommended to transfer it to JOC as note. This was my first submission to JOC, there were 4 reviewers, which scared me, but the result was not bad. Bravo!

(2) Thank | 碳碳碳

My manuscript was submitted to ACS catalysis. The review comments came back, one minor revision, one major revision, and one rejection. The editor suggested transferring it to the Journal of Organic Chemistry (JOC) after revising the comments. I submitted it on January 20, 2019 after revision. The review comments came back on February 22, the previous three reviewers all said OK, and the fourth reviewer picked by the editor of JOC gave some revision comments. I answered the questions earnestly and resubmitted it on March 10, and it was accepted on March 14. It has just been accepted now. There were two revisions from submission to acceptance; the article is much more rigorous. I am grateful that the fourth reviewer pointed out an error in my mass spectrometry characterization.

(3) Thank | 温城

The review process is carefully conducted and the speed is very fast. The IF of JOC is not high, it is far less than Science, Nature, and not more than Angew, JACS, or OL. However, it is a top journal of organic synthesis since it is very authoritative in the field of organic synthesis. Due to the large number of published articles, it is difficult to increase the IF.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review process was very fast.
Submitted before Christmas 24 years ago, because Organic Letters was rejected, the reviewer suggested submission to JOC. 
The comments came back at the end of January, with minor revisions. There was a Christmas holiday in between, so it was very fast.
The revisions were completed at the beginning of February and returned. Mid-month, a request came back to change the format, and the revisions were completed by the end of the month.
Pre-acceptance in early March, with another request to change the format. The revisions were completed at lightning speed and returned, then accepted two days later.

(0) Thank | 咸鱼王

The latest Chinese Academy of Sciences ranking is not top-tier journals anymore, which is regrettable

(1) Thank | linlibuz

Although JOC is classified as a 2nd tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, it is considered an A-level journal in our university's evaluation and is highly recognized. However, it is really distressing to see JOC's impact factor continuously decreasing. We hope that JOC will continue to improve and become a 1st tier journal soon!

2023.04.02 Submitted. (Automatically displayed as under review status)
2023.04.11 Assigned to editor
2023.05.13 One rejection, one major revision, one minor revision. The editor seems nice, giving one month for major revision.
2023.06.11 Submitted revised manuscript
2023.06.23 Notified of minor revision. The editor emphasized HRMS and gave one month.
2023.06.24 Submitted revised manuscript
2023.06.28 Accepted
2023.07.11 Online

After all, JOC is an established journal in organic chemistry and places great emphasis on the rigor of compound synthesis and characterization data. It is necessary to provide perfect data whenever possible.

(1) Thank | Moonquakes

The second article of my master's degree, the teacher wanted to directly submit it to OBC (a journal), but I felt that submitting it to a third-tier journal would be a bit inappropriate, so I tried JOC (another journal). In just half a month, I received more than twenty comments, which were quite detailed. The revisions were accepted within a week, and the speed was pretty good. Looking at the evaluations from three foreign reviewers, it made me feel that my work was not as bad as I had imagined, haha. As expected, earlier this year, two top journals published articles with strategies similar to mine. They were done quite well and even cited my article...

(4) Thank | tujiad

Hello, could you please send me a copy of the BJOC submission template in Word format? The one I downloaded from the official website is different from the one that has been published. Where can I find the submission template? My email is 919836553@qq.com. Thank you very much.

(0) Thank | nmpa12306

3.8No. 4.6 received a reply, all three said big change, original,Repair No. 5.4Reply No. 5.175.18 repaired back to minor repair5.21 reception!Very happy!This is my second article, I have been watching this forum before, and I am going to select for it! THANK this website

(1) Thank | zz_baidu@qq.com

4Submission No. 5,Submitted for trial on April 11th.On May 10th, the review comments were received. Both minor repairs were considered to be better than the average. One said that the innovation was not good, and the editor-in-chief listened to the rejection of the third person.

(0) Thank | 网络老鼠

The journal has a high impact!The difficulty of submission is a bit large, 20% recruitment rate, the content of the article is really good!Asking for work has some innovation.The reviewer's opinion is also very professional, and it will help the improvement of the article grade!

(0) Thank | JMCC

encountered a very careful reviewer, saying that there are several compounds that are not clean. After purification, the spectrum is clean. After returning, it is said that the yield of the text has not changed.Drunk, I was so careful.Finally it is accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

JOC The quality of the article is very good. Generally, it can withstand the test of time. If the organic article does not meet the standards of JACS, Angew, Chem. Sci., OL, EuropeanizationWhen it is more hanging, JOC is the best choice.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

JOC is a very good journal, you should always pay attention to

(0) Thank | Anonymous

JOC hit rate is OK, not particularly difficult.My paper was thrown out on June 23, and the news came back on July 23. Four reviewers, one said refused, one said that the overhaul was accepted, and the other two said that Xiao Xiu accepted, and the questions asked were not difficult, relatively speaking.Good deal.The editor said that after the modification is needed, basically the questions that can be asked can be processed, the data is supplemented, and it is thrown out on August 3, and accepted on August 22.Appears in just accepted.This acceptance time is quite long.It took a total of two months.The journal focuses on the synthesis, purity, and systematic nature of the compound.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

May 6th, 2012: Submission May 26th: There are news (four reviewers: one overhaul, one minor repair, one acceptance, one rejection) May 26-28:Revised paper May 28th: ​​Re-submitment June 7th: Received, appeared on the just accepted version on June 14th: Proof of June 15th: The article appeared on the ASAP version and is estimated to be officially published in a month or two..

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It took about 40 days to submit the reply to the reply, and it was accepted 4 days after the modification.The JOC impact factor is just over 4.0, although not as high as CC and OL, but as a traditional old journal, it is still good.Personally feel that its innovation is not as good as the latter two, mainly suitable for the publication of organic synthesis and follow-up research.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Magazine is very good, personally feel better than Adv. Synth. Catal., Org. Biomol. Chem., slightly less than OL, CCSome, but some of the articles are no less good than the latter two.Requires a high degree of novelty and systemicity, especially Article is very systemic.The requirements for characterization data are also high.Can be issued on the JOC, its data published in other journals generally no problem.In the past, Note required to be streamlined within 4 pages. Now that JOC has been revised, the requirements for Note space seem to be relaxed.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Organic Chemistry Journal Comments: Bull List http://blog.renren.com/share/234775706/7103343501 Hope to help everyone.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://pubs.acs.org/journal/joceah

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Not bad, I have some help for my major

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The requirements for the map data are higher.Synthetic method compounds need to have some innovation.

(0) Thank | Anonymous