It is a traditional old brand journal in the filed of Brain-computer interface. It is a well-known top journal in the field, and there are many papers with classic technologies. The journal pays more attention to innovation and field value. The quality of the article is excellent, and there is option for subscription publication, which is free of charge. The preliminary review will take 1 and a half months.

(18) Thank | sky007

It is a recognized journal in the field of brain-computer interface. The review speed was moderate. Initial review comments were received 3 months later. Then it went through 2 rounds of major revisions. The reviewers’ opinions were very professional, but there were also situations where the questions raised were rather tricky due to different professional concerns. Received, 29 August 2019; Revised, 8 July 2020; Accepted, 21 July 2020; Accepted Manuscript online, 21 July 2020.

(5) Thank | Aizmeng

This journal is very efficient. The review results will be notified in about two months for the first submission; Generally, in the comments on major revision, one and a half revision will be given for revision; And the news will be given in a month or so to notify whether it is accepted or not.

(3) Thank | 大静

J NEURAL ENG belongs with other well-known journals in the engineering industry. It is an excellent journal of the Engineering: Biomedical sub-industry.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

我想租一辆汽车去旅行。

(0) Thank | 管明娟

Manuscript received indicates that the manuscript is still in the hands of the editor and has not been sent out for review yet

(0) Thank | 科研橙

Hello, what is your current status?

(0) Thank | SCI中中中！！！！

Submitted on 20240331, it has been one week since the Manuscript was Received. Has it reached the hands of the editor, my friends?

(0) Thank | 雨雨雨呀

2023.8.17 Submission
2023.10.19 Major Overhaul
2024.1.02 Minor Overhaul
2024.1.23 Preliminary Acceptance
2024.1.31 Formal Acceptance

(0) Thank | Jay的秋刀鱼和猫

2023.6.3 Editorial Assessment
2023.6.15 Out to reviewers
2023.7.5 1st reviewer agreed to report
2023.7.26 All reviewer reports received
2023.8.3 major revision
2023.9.11 Out to reviewers
2023.9.28 Provisional acceptance
2023.10.10 Formal acceptance

(0) Thank | xkxyw

2023.6.12 Manuscript Received (Submission)
2023.6.17 Awaiting Referee Reports
2023.7.03 Awaiting Decision
2023.7.10 Major Revision
2023.8.13 Manuscript Received (Submission)
2023.8.20 Awaiting Referee Reports
2023.8.30 Minor Revision
2023.9.01 Manuscript Received (Submission)
2023.9.06 Awaiting Decision
2023.9.07 Provisionally Accepted
2023.9.07 Formal Acceptance

(3) Thank | tjp2023

Hello, I would like to ask how long it usually takes to receive the link for the final draft after a paper has been accepted?

(0) Thank | ysqhacjh

I feel that this journal is a bit slow.

(1) Thank | Jay的秋刀鱼和猫

The journal in the field of Neurology and Rehabilitation Engineering is highly recognized and of high quality. The first review process takes a little over a month with two reviewers asking professional questions. First, there was a major revision, followed by a minor revision before acceptance, which took a total of exactly 3 months.

(0) Thank | 谷满霜雪

Hello, I would like to ask if you have chosen to pay APC? Will this affect the review or publication speed?

(0) Thank | Christine2020

Your speed is so fast. I submitted my paper at the end of December 2021 in the field of neuroimaging, and it is still under external review. It's really slow!

(0) Thank | 陈仨仨

2021-11-03 Post;
2021-11-29 Received peer review comments (2 reviewers: one provided many detailed comments; the other gave positive feedback but suggested additional analysis and explanation in certain major aspects)
2022-01-17 Submitted for re-review
2021-02-09 Officially accepted
Awaiting publication

(1) Thank | miraclefish

The journal is definitely a good journal, not to mention the content, the requirements for English language, writing style, and format are all very strict. The opinions of the two reviewers mainly focus on the format and grammar issues in lengthy discussions. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on innovation, and if there are similar papers, it is important to highlight one's own innovative aspects. But to be honest, the two reviewers are probably not experts in this field, as they have no substantial constructive suggestions for my methodology. One of them also has a bad attitude, maybe because the paper did not leave a good impression on him. In conclusion, it is still a challenging journal, and I need to improve myself to meet its standards.

(0) Thank | 哆啦S梦

May I ask where to download the LaTeX template for this journal?

(0) Thank | 小鱼钓猫

The review process is fast, with feedback given within two months. There were two reviewers, one being highly professional and providing many suggestions, while the other seemed less thorough. Strangely, both reviewers seemed to have access to each other's comments and raised similar questions. Overall, the efficiency of the journal is very high, and the impact factor has increased this year. It is worth submitting to.

(0) Thank | sdsdvas111

The brain-computer interface is an old-established journal with relatively high recognition in the field. The review process is quite fast, with the first review taking about two months or a little more. The reviewers' opinions are also very professional.

(1) Thank | by_z_96

Top journals in the field of brain-machine interfaces have high requirements for article quality and receive very professional peer review comments.

(25) Thank | Dream!