Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J INSECT SCI | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1536-2442 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 4.60% | ||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience | ||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/login/login.jspx?resourceUrl=%2Ffaces%2Fpages%2Fnavigation%2FNavController.jspx%3FJRNL_ACR%3DIP%26 | ||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
Publisher | UNIV ARIZONA, LIBRARY C327, TUCSON, USA, AZ, 85721 | ||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Irregular | ||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1536-2442%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE: | Write a review |
Author: swswsw1221@sina.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-11-24 09:35:47 From submission to publication was about four months. It was accepted for open access. The level of the journal is ok, and reviewers are serious. The open access fee was 5200 yuan. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 早起鸟儿 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-23 11:07:09 Two very professional reviewers, both seasoned experts from the United States, conducted a meticulous review of the manuscript. One professional editor provided 7 pages of constructive feedback, greatly improving the quality of the article by adding data and results. It is truly rare to encounter such a professional and responsible reviewer. The revised manuscript has shown significant improvement compared to the original submission. I recommend everyone to pay more attention to this journal and hope that it will continue to improve. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Tommy2003 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-05-11 16:01:41 Submitted on April 16, 2023; received reviewer's comments on May 2, minor revisions; revised on May 8; accepted on May 9. Quite fast! The expertise of the reviewers was high, and they provided great suggestions to enhance the content of the article. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 21:16:37 Post hoc comparison is a test of non-research hypotheses. It is very common in actual research: I have completed the experiment, the hypothesis has been confirmed, but it is still necessary to extend the research, so it is necessary to continue exploring the data to see which direction will produce valuable conclusions. At this point, it is equivalent to testing all possible comparisons (although in reality I cannot exhaust all comparisons, but because there is no specific purpose, all comparisons are potential possibilities). Because comparison does not only refer to the difference in the means of two treatments, linear combinations of multiple treatments are also comparisons ![]() ![]() |
Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 10:27:57 Choose the post-hoc test method based on the data results obtained ![]() ![]() |
Author: 八坂篷蔚 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-28 13:06:07 What type of post-test should I use? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 陶宜三岁啦 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-26 15:35:27 Why do we need to conduct post-inspections? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 五轮博达 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-17 16:17:08 The results submitted in March 2017 were returned in June, with minor revisions. After the revisions, they were reviewed for another 2 days before finally being accepted. They were quickly made available as open access after acceptance, and the reviewers' comments were very detailed and thoughtful ![]() ![]() |
Author: 四象惜玉 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-17 14:08:07 Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: Submitted in May 2018, received feedback in June with minor revisions. After revising, it was re-reviewed for 2 days and then accepted. The article was quickly made open access. The reviewers were very attentive and asked questions in great detail ![]() ![]() |
Author: alin-SH Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-17 09:44:38 In March 2017, the result of returning in June, minor repair, and after the repair, it was reviewed for another 2 days. Later, it was received. After accepting it, it was open access, and the reviewer was very serious.The problem is particularly careful. ![]() ![]() |
Author: alin-SH Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-17 09:37:00 In May 2018, the result of returning in June, minor repair, and after the repair, it was reviewed for another 2 days. Later, it was received. After receiving it, it was open access, and the reviewer was very serious.The problem is particularly careful. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-14 09:08:41 Anyway, with this bearish appearance, there won't be any changes, as long as it doesn't fall, it will be lucky ![]() ![]() |
Author: 长安诗岚 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-11-24 17:02:21 Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: I submitted in February and received the results in June. There was major revision, which took another 3 months for re-review before finally being accepted. I paid for language editing in between and it became open access quickly after acceptance. The quality of the journal is acceptable and the reviewers are very professional. My biggest issue now is that my supervisor thinks all SCI journals are free, so he refuses to reimburse me for the 5200 yuan open access fee ![]() ![]() |
Author: zcq@njau.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-04 21:16:33 It is reported that the editor of the journal has recently been changed, and the review speed is very fast.The reviewer was very careful and many small details were raised.The results of the first trial, Minor, were corrected after two days of repair. ![]() ![]() |
Author: zcq@njau.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-04 21:16:28 It is reported that the editor of the journal has recently changed, and the review speed is very fast.The reviewer was very careful and many small details were raised.The results of the first trial, Minor, were corrected after two days of repair. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 易梦小可爱 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-04 19:24:24 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: It is reported that the journal recently changed its editor-in-chief, and the review speed has become very fast. The reviewers are very detailed and point out many small details. After minor revisions in the first review, the paper was accepted just two days after resubmission ![]() ![]() |
Author: 七濑东菊 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-04 10:59:33 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: It is reported that the journal editor was recently changed, and the review speed was very fast. The reviewers were very meticulous and pointed out many small details. After minor revisions in the first round of review, the paper was accepted within two days ![]() ![]() |
Author: chenchengyu@126.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-06-24 16:52:46 The review speed is slow, and the reception is relatively easy. If the manuscript has no echo for a long time, you can ask the editor, so there will be a reply soon ![]() ![]() |
Author: 太虚康震 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-06-24 10:51:43 Review Speed: 12.0 Experience Sharing: The review speed is relatively slow, but acceptance is relatively easy. If there is no response for a long time, you can ask the editor and usually get a reply quickly ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-06-08 10:02:28 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: The review process was fast, but the subsequent steps were slow. There was no communication from the editors for nearly six months, but the paper was eventually accepted after 8 months from submission to acceptance ![]() ![]() |
Author: 西奥博尔德巴雷特 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-05-28 16:38:30 Why can't I register on the homepage? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 极乐寻山 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-26 19:52:55 I feel pretty bad about it and the review speed is also slow, but it is relatively easy to accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-26 13:52:00 personal feeling is very bad, and the review speed is slow, but relatively easy to accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: Dylan Eve Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-25 20:04:32 Submit to editors for a week and wait for the results ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-21 09:08:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.insectscience.org/ ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page |