Although this journal doesn’t have a high impact factor, the submission requirements are still quite high. The reviewers also had VERY detailed opinions.

(0) Thank | Karrie

Hello, do you need the raw data for all the experiments?

(0) Thank | 梦溪笔谈

Just accept the editor's modifications if you agree with them. If you disagree, write your reasons directly below the comments and then provide feedback to the editor. If there is a disagreement, negotiate further

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

When responding to reviewer comments, all questions must be answered point by point without omission. Efforts should be made to fulfill any additional experiments requested in the comments, and if unable to do so, provide reasonable reasons for why it cannot be done. Literature recommended by the reviewers must be cited and thoroughly discussed. Before resubmitting the revised manuscript, be sure to check all the corrections made in the initial draft

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the differences between responding to reviewers' comments and responding to the comments of journal editors?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

How to respond to journal editor feedback?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Did you win in the end?

(0) Thank | 通幽凯风

Could you please tell me which magazine CCM is?

(0) Thank | Woodrow Adolph

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Although it is only a journal in the third district, the requirements are still quite high, and the reviewers provided very detailed comments

(0) Thank | 西风傲菡

I did the same thing as you. The mechanism was not explained in depth. I initially tried to submit to CCM, but it was rejected. I originally wanted to submit to AJRCMB, but decided to try anesthesiology first. Surprisingly, it was revised and received lots of feedback. I conducted experiments for over half a year. Then, I resubmitted the revised work to CCM, which was also revised. I conducted experiments for another half a year. Finally, CCM accepted the submission

(0) Thank | 东京夏珍

Submitted twice, have to pay $50 for review fee. However, both times received direct simple rejections without any useful comments. The first time I thought maybe the article was too biased for the editor to give feedback, but the second article was also simply rejected. I feel like I wasted the review fee, might as well try other journals at the same level first

(0) Thank | 冰心慧红

Hello seniors and experts, what is the acceptance rate for this? Is there any review fee required? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 云来梓熙

Although progress has been slow, being at this critical juncture, it will not be easy to push further upwards. With a score of over 4, I am satisfied

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Although the score is not high, it is relatively recognized in the industry (which is a disadvantage domestically), the difficulty of submitting contributions is still relatively high, and the language requirements are quite high (it feels like the reviewers are all old people), but the submission requirements are not very stringent

(0) Thank | 碧水文宣

Dear seniors, I am conducting pathological research on animal experiments of pulmonary fibrosis. The mechanism explanation is not very in-depth. Is it appropriate to submit to this journal?

(0) Thank | 江南幼柏

The official journal of the American Thoracic Society, commonly known as the "red journal", publishes basic research articles that are highly regarded in the industry. The review process is strict, and additional experiments are often required

(0) Thank | Walter Johnson