Ten days after submission, I received the minor revision decision. I resubmitted it a day later. I was told that it will be in proofs in 10 days and online soon after. The journal has higher requirements for innovation and data. The acceptance rate is not high, about 10%. This year, the journal has significantly expanded. Last year, it published 189 articles, and nearly 300 this year.

(6) Thank | 刘德华粉丝1303

All on the same day, the manuscript was submitted to the editor for review, reviews were completed and revisions were made on the same day, and the revised manuscript was resubmitted to the editor for acceptance on the same day.

(0) Thank | Xiaoxiao Bu

Hello, my Reviews Completed have been four days already and the date has been changed once, but I still haven't received any feedback. What does this mean?

(0) Thank | AAAABBBFC

How long does it take for "reviews completed" to change to "minor revision" after completion? It's been two days since my reviews were completed and it hasn't changed yet.

(0) Thank | AAAABBBFC

We submitted the manuscript in May, received feedback in June after a week of review, and made major revisions according to the feedback from the three reviewers, who were all very professional. We were asked to resubmit in August, and we supplemented all experiments as required. The revised figures were twice the size of the original ones. In September, we received a second round of feedback, and the editor indicated that the manuscript would be accepted pending further modifications, mainly in the text. We resubmitted a week later, and the editor replied within three days that the manuscript had been accepted. I checked and found that the reviewers had no further comments. Overall, the whole process took about five months, which was relatively fast. I am deeply moved by the hard work of my master's students over the past three years, especially during the pandemic. They delved into machine learning, a field they had never touched before. In the past, we were rejected by journals with an impact factor of ten or more, which made some of us doubt ourselves. As a teacher, I carefully evaluated the originality of the paper again and made extensive revisions with my students. Looking back, almost the entire manuscript has been modified, including the images. The students worked diligently to revise and supplement the paper, and meticulously organized the literature references multiple times. One excellent paper is equivalent to ten average ones in terms of volume and effort. I am deeply touched by the perseverance of my students and gratified by the team's unwavering pursuit.

(5) Thank | 杨小跳麻麻

2024.6.11 Submitted to Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
2024.6.13 Editor Assigned, Reviewers Invited
2024.6.19 Reviewers Agreed (Under Review)
2024.6.27 Reviewers Invited
2024.6.28 Reviewers Agreed (Under Review)
2024.7.11 Reviews Completed, Minor Revision
2024.8.8 Submitted to Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
2024.8.9 Editor Assigned, Accept
The efficiency of handling manuscripts by Editor Mauro Castelli is extremely high, with responses usually being provided on the same day as changes in manuscript status.
The acceptance rate is around 10%. If a manuscript is not accepted by established oncology journals like Cancer Research, consider submitting to JECCR.

(1) Thank | Xiaoxiao Bu

Hello, do I need to upload the original data when submitting a paper?

(0) Thank | lsdjy

Requesting referees to provide feedback within 14 days, currently reviewing a manuscript

(1) Thank | brianyp

May I ask how long it took to receive the first revision comments?

(0) Thank | KEG

The review process is fast, and the expert opinions are excellent. After making modifications according to the expert opinions, it is directly accepted for publication. It is a journal with extremely high cost-effectiveness.

(1) Thank | yang