The processing speed and process of Zhejiang journal is relatively perfect. Although it is a journal in Q4, the quality of the articles is relatively high. Compared with some articles in Q2 and Q3 IEEE series journals, the theoretical requirements may not be very strong, but the actual innovation, contribution, and exploration must be complete. Compared to some valueless journals in Q2 and Q3, the requirements of this journal for quality and completeness are higher. It is true that the requirement of this journal for English is high. If you don’t write seriously, it cannot meet the requirement for the English, and it can even be rejected for this reason. (I submitted IEEE before, English is satisfactory, but it is directly unqualified here.) Although the article is (submitted to journal in) Q4, the progressiveness and completeness should be highlighted. Otherwise, it will be rejected in the initial review (before being sent for review). The experts in this journal are very proficient in images and other fields. The reviewers may be very sharp, and pick out the fault from every sentence. There are usually 2 to 3 reviewers. The review comments are definitely better than some IEEE journals that say nothing but on the ground of inappropriateness. The rejection rate pf this journal is not so high. However, it is a bimonthly-published journal, and the articles accepted in a year are not so many. For those who want to graduate immediately, it is best to find an easier valueless journal in Q4.

(29) Thank | 不好

It was sent for review after two weeks (I don’t know why mine is so slow). Two months later, major revisions were requested in the first review. It was returned and re-submitted after ten days. Forty days later, minor revisions were requested in the second review. It was revised and returned three days later. Then it was accepted accordingly. The overall process was quite formal, as well as each process (After the first review, the revised manuscript must be returned and submitted with the corresponding author’s account). Innovation is required, but the difficulty requirement of innovation is not high (But innovation needs to be reasonable and appropriate). It is mainly because the experiments and the logical completeness of the essay must be written a lot and complete to show that what you are doing is meaningful, reasonable, and competitive. It is easy to be accepted. Personally thinking, if the manuscript is not rejected in the first review, it will not be a big problem for the second review. Especially for minor revisions, it's basically means acceptance. Therefore, the first review and the primary review of this journal are relatively strict. I submitted to it twice before. One time was that the manuscript was rejected in the primary review; Another time was that the manuscript was rejected for the first review. Counting this acceptance, I had two experiences for articles being accepted.

(12) Thank | 老101

9. An improved hierarchical WLAN positioning method. 10. An improved pedestrain tracking method based on Wi-Fi fingerprinting and Pedestrain Dead Reckoning. 11. Video abnormal behavior detection method based on generative countermeasure network (Q3, Q4).

(0) Thank | Peterli

Review is fast, less than 3 months. 1 knowledgeable reviewer. 1 totally naive. Not much help from the editor.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Do I need to provide the source code of the paper?

(0) Thank | lmm1234

Is there any new information?

(0) Thank | xingz123

In the morning it's "Under Consideration - Editor," by evening it becomes "Decision Pending Editor Approval," so it's likely that it's not going to happen.

(0) Thank | gzy666

Finding reviewers is very slow, especially in the field of image processing. Only one major revision was returned from August 2024 to January 2025, and it was rejected in March. The reasons for rejection were also very vague.

(0) Thank | riderda

Hello everyone, I have had my JEI article published, but I chose the non-OA option. Can anyone tell me how to download my own article for free? It seems that even the authors have to pay over twenty dollars to download it.

(0) Thank | Visito

Accepted in a few days.

(0) Thank | DD126

This status was accepted in just a few days.

(0) Thank | DD126

2025-01-21 Submit revised manuscript
2025-02-12 Accepted

(0) Thank | 小薯条77

However, the corresponding author was unable to find the submission channel for the revised article after logging in. Should the article be resubmitted in the same way as the initial submission?

(0) Thank | 雨晨123

Hello, I was hired in November and I still haven't received any information yet. How about you? o(╥﹏╥)o

(0) Thank | caybtc

Please submit the email login method of the corresponding author.

(0) Thank | 小薯条77

Does anyone know how to submit the revised draft after major revisions? Thank you in advance!

(0) Thank | 雨晨123

Hello, how should the revised manuscript be submitted?

(0) Thank | 雨晨123

Hello, I would like to ask how to submit the revised manuscript after the major revision?

(0) Thank | 雨晨123

Hello, I would like to ask how to submit the revised manuscript.

(0) Thank | 雨晨123

It has been 24 days now and we still haven't moved on to the next step. Is there anyone in the same situation as me?

(0) Thank | kkby!!

It has been 15 days since submission, and the status is still under consideration. Will it be rejected directly? The submission is in the field of computer video visual processing.

(0) Thank | kkby!!

2025-01-21 Accept as submitted
2024-12-18 Resubmit

(1) Thank | Visito

2024-12-09 Accept with only minor changes noted in substantive review
2024-10-30 Under Review
2024-10-29 Contacting Potential Reviewers
2024-10-01 Under Review
2024-10-01 Resubmit
2024-06-06 Reject
2024-06-03 Under Review
2024-05-13 All Reviewers Assigned
2024-04-02 Under Review
2024-03-28 Contacting Potential Reviewers
2024-03-20 Under Review
2024-03-19 Submit Paper

(1) Thank | Visito

2024.10.16 submission
2024.11.5 all reviewers assigned
2024.12.2 under review
2024.12.3 decision sent
2024.12.3 waiting for revision
2024.12.20 approved files submitted
2024.12.20 submission check- editorial office
2024.12.24 contacting potential reviewers
2024.12.31 all reviewers assigned
2025.1.13 decision pending editor approval
2025.1.14 accept as submitted

Overall, the review process was relatively fast, with the first review taking 1.5 months, followed by one month for revisions and acceptance. From initial submission to acceptance, the process took nearly three months. The overall workflow was clear, and the requirements were not overly demanding, making it suitable for first-time submissions or urgent situations.

(0) Thank | jjxxxx1

How are you doing now, classmate?

(0) Thank | HHhwps