2019.10 Submitted, 2020.1 required a major revision, 2020.2 revision submitted. 2020.4.25 Accepted. (Archiving completed on 25-Apr-2020). There has been no news yet. I sent reminder emails three times in the middle, and the answer was always "Your article is in process and will be publish online as soon as possible." or "Kindly be informed your article is with production and article will be publish online as soon as possible." Can anyone help to see what's wrong with it?

(0) Thank | cfm

2020.1.28, submission; 2020.5.5, major revision; 2020.5.16, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.5.19, accept, with DOI number; 2020.6.8, online. In general, the review speed was fast. During the period, I urged twice and the reply was fast. The average review cycle is three months. My article direction: oncology, bioinformatics; DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29842. Welcome everyone to cite!

(62) Thank | Wenyi Jin

Two months after submission, I received a notice of revision. It took 6 months for major revision, and the content of the article was basically doubled after revision. In fact, it took 3 months for revision and resubmission. I received a notice of acceptance, early review lasted 20 days. DOI 10.1002/jcp.28008. Electron microscope, fluorescence confocal, western are all used. Novel findings on ultrastructural protection of skeletal muscle fibers during hibernation of Daurian ground squirrels: Mitochondria, nuclei, cytoskeleton, glycogen. Welcome everyone to cite my article.

(28) Thank | 战神下凡

Make sure the abstract is less than 300 words, the discussion is at least a few pages, and the resolution of the images is high.

(11) Thank | 奔跑的小兽医

The submission was made on July 12th, it's been almost two months now. Has it been sent for external review? How long does the first review usually take? EIC: Heath, RobertADM: Editorial Office, JCPUnder review.

(0) Thank | 华清怀曼

Do you need to provide the original Western Blot strips and the entire membrane?

(0) Thank | 咖啡猫的幸福生活

Do you need the original image in WB format?

(0) Thank | 咖啡猫的幸福生活

Hello, is "under review" already sent for external review or is the editor still reviewing it? It's been 9 days since submission and it's still in this state, I'm not sure what it means. I completely forgot what the initial status was

(0) Thank | YangY

Review speed: 1.0
Experience sharing: Submitted for review for one month, with a total of three reviewers. Two reviewers approved the submission, but one reviewer rejected it, resulting in rejection. Additionally, it is under review for external review

(0) Thank | 玉景丽姿

Research focus: Reproduction; Bioinformatics experience sharing: Hey folks, I want to ask if the article status of journal of cellular physiology is "Under review", does it mean it has been sent out for external review? Because I forgot what the initial submission status was, can someone please advise me on this?

(0) Thank | 玉景丽姿

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Focused research direction: DNA damage
Experience sharing: Non-bioinformatics work, submitted at the end of March, accepted in early November, reviewers are quite strict, but the questions are still relatively fair

(0) Thank | 八坂惠然

I have been working on it for over half a month, and it still says "Draft". I am crying. Did I forget to submit it?

(0) Thank | 玉霄安卉

They actually just want you to pay for their editing services. You can follow the link they provide to access Wiley Editing Services and select the appropriate paid service. Submit the revised draft and proof of editing together. Moreover, the links they provide for you to download the revised draft and proof are usually non-secure links and often don't work

(0) Thank | 北海平安

Excuse me, am I in the same situation as you now? Have you already followed up from behind? Or are you still waiting, and then have an external audit behind?

(0) Thank | 惜珊氏

He may be referring to the alert in 2021, and the alert periodicals have been withdrawn in the last two years

(0) Thank | 凌霄鸿飞

What system did you submit with? Wiley system is very convenient

(0) Thank | 凌霄鸿飞

Looking forward to hearing from you, seniors

(0) Thank | 长安嘉宝

Dear colleagues, are there anyone familiar with the submission rules? I have submitted three times and all were rejected, constantly mentioning the content in the pictures. Is it necessary for both the corresponding author and submitting author to have institutional emails? I (the first author) provided my institutional email and ORCID, but it still doesn't work. Does anyone know why? Thank you in advance

(0) Thank | 长安嘉宝

Where did you see the moderate warning? I didn't see it in the 2023 CAS warning. Is it your school's warning?

(0) Thank | 是你的协洽呀

After submitting the paper, I found out that it is a predatory journal, so I immediately withdrew my submission. Our research group has already blacklisted them

(0) Thank | 北陆乐英

What is your current situation?

(0) Thank | 是香蝶吖

It has been a week since submission, and it has been stuck at "Awaiting Admin Processing." What is going on? Has anyone experienced this before? Please help!

(0) Thank | 震雷玉梅

It's been 1 week since I submitted this, but it's still "Awaiting Admin Processing". What is going on? Has anyone else experienced this?

(0) Thank | 震雷玉梅

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Research focuses: cell biology; biochemistry; physiology
Experience sharing: The journal is undergoing reforms, and I feel the quality control and review comments are quite professional now. It has entered Zone 1 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences this year, the old journal still has a solid foundation. Hopefully the impact factor will continue to rise

(0) Thank | 雷电迎春

Warning periodical Q, this list is really N, it's a scam. Articles sent earlier can't be used either. Raji List.

(41) Thank | 战神下凡