Please delete unnecessary parts according to the central content of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The selected charts and graphs clearly present the research's main points, while also avoiding repetition of information: Supplementary charts can be included in the appendix

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

I have too many results, and the article cannot hold them all. What should I do?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

If I have too many pictures or tables exceeding the number required by the journal, how should I deal with it?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

Seeking for experiences and sharing

(0) Thank | Oliver Jerry

2016IF:3.351

(0) Thank | 宗室向凝

Instant IF = 1998/669 = 2.987

(0) Thank | 昭巫怀梦

Don't drop the three from 3,004

(0) Thank | 昭巫怀梦

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: 3.004, this score is too unstable. Once it drops below 3 points, it may never rise again. 3 points is a threshold!

(0) Thank | 神古苑博

It has become a non-top journal in the third district. Ah, I really don't know what to say

(0) Thank | 昭巫怀梦

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The first review took 25 days, with very detailed comments. The second review lasted 24 days, with one reviewer suggesting a preposition change in a relative clause. The third revision was accepted on the same day it was submitted. It is important to ensure that the research content aligns with the scope of the journal. Additionally, the journal may require reviewers to provide specific feedback on all aspects of the manuscript. Unfortunately, the impact factor has been declining, despite still being classified as a top journal

(0) Thank | 奉天山灵

About 25 days, the comments are very detailed.

(0) Thank | wjj

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review process takes around 25 days and the feedback provided is very detailed

(0) Thank | 暴风长志

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Layout fees and charges for color and black and white illustrations are quite expensive, with low cost-performance ratio. The fee for a three-star magazine is even higher than a five-star one, what the heck

(0) Thank | 昭巫怀梦

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Strict review. Submitted in early August, received major revisions by the end of August, supplemented with one month of experiments, submitted revised manuscript and received feedback two weeks later, continued major revisions, carefully checked and supplemented according to the reviewer's comments, finally received good news two weeks later - minor revisions, and three days after submission received notice of acceptance, was extremely excited. Summary of experience: 1. The article needs to have enough novelty. 2. Respond strictly to the reviewer's requirements, addressing each point. 3. It is important to be sincere in expectations, detailed explanations of different opinions must be provided to the reviewer

(0) Thank | 昭巫怀梦

Too mysterious, dropped a bit more than last year, can we aim for 3 points next year? It seems unreliable

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Considering submitting an article, please share your experience of submitting an article. Thank you all!

(0) Thank | 巴蜀若秋

Many articles in the Journal of Applied Physiology are of high quality, but unfortunately they do not receive much attention from the medical community, otherwise the impact factor would definitely increase again!!

(0) Thank | 朝炜小娘子

Bullish, will it rise again next year?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁