2.5 submitted; 3.10 under review; 4.15 revision; 4.21 revision submitted; 4.30 accepted.

(0) Thank | cytong

Submitted on December 9th, first revision submitted on February 11th, and after the second revision submitted on February 19th, it was accepted on the same evening. The editor-in-chief and editors were very friendly. It was about Microalgae Nutrition and Lipid Metabolism. This is my first article in Journal of Applied Phycology, and the second article is being reviewed. I hope there will be good news!

(1) Thank | 阿宝

March 22, submitted; March 27, resubmitted (format question); April 6, Under review; April 15, Under review; August 12, Reviews Completed. (During July 28, I wrote to ask why the under review took so long. The editor-in-chief was nice and replied that he also felt that one of the reviewers was too slow. He helped me urging it and let me wait patiently.) August 13, major revision (6 weeks given for major revisions). September 26, revision submitted; September 26 Editor Assigned; September 27, Accepted. To sum up, the journal is average, but the editor is fast, but the reviewers are a bit slow. One of them delayed us for at least more than three months without reviewing the manuscript. After being urged by the editor, the manuscript was successfully reviewed.

(1) Thank | snooker

Several months for review. Overall, the speed of review is very fast, the editor and the two reviewers were very nice, and the opinions given were also very objective. Highly efficient.

(0) Thank | 769306713@qq.com

Submission on October 9, 2024
Editorial assignment on October 11, 2024, inviting reviewers
Received the first round of review comments on November 27, 2024, major revisions, with over 20 comments from two reviewers. Reviewers were very thorough and professional. Given 2 weeks for revisions.
Submitted revised manuscript on December 9, 2024
Received the second round of review comments on January 6, 2025, one reviewer approved for publication, while the other raised some minor issues for further revision before publication. The editor provided some feedback on formatting and units.
Submitted revised manuscript on January 13, 2025
Manuscript accepted on January 14, 2025
Overall, the editor's efficiency was high, with the main time-consuming aspect being the initial invitation of reviewers for the first round.

(0) Thank | potaotzp

The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC, or Pearson's r) is a widely used measure of linear correlation

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Statistics generally uses the p-value obtained from significance testing methods, with P typically

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to calculate relevance?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as titles

(0) Thank | 平原文波

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: 2.5 submitted 3.10 under review 4.15 revision 4.21 revision submitted 4.30 accepted

(0) Thank | 江南芃芃

Review speed: 2.0
Sharing of experience: Submitted on December 9, first revision on February 11, second revision on the same day on February 19, received acceptance on the same evening with the editor and chief editor being very friendly. Looking forward to the review of microalgae nutrition and lipid metabolism for the first article in the Journal of Applied Phycology. Hopefully, there will be good news for the second article!

(0) Thank | 法慧才良

3.22 submitted
3.27 resubmitted (format issue)
4.6 under review
4.15 under review
8.12 reviews completed (Inquiry on 7.28 as to why under review for so long, nice editor replied saying he also thought one of the reviewers was too slow, he helped to push it along, asked me to be patient.)
8.13 major revision (given 6 weeks for revision)
9.26 revision submitted
9.26 editor assigned
9.27 accept
In summary, the journal is average, but the editor is quick, while the reviewers are a bit slow, with one of them delaying my review for at least over 3 months. After the editor inquired, the review process went smoothly

(0) Thank | 先天彭勃

Review speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: Research direction is algae genetics. The editor's handling and review speed is very fast, with the first review taking one month, with only one reviewer's comments. There were over a dozen major revisions to the review comments, and the second review took less than a month, with direct acceptance. It took a total of three months from submission to online publication

(0) Thank | 明冠岚翠

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted for the first time on November 26, because the author returned on the 28th, submitted again on the 29th, assigned to an editor on December 3, assigned to a reviewer on the 4th, under review on the 5th, and directly accepted on January 9. Happiness came too suddenly, it's simply unbelievable. My dream has really come true, and I can graduate successfully. I work on algal applications, which may be more in line with the tastes of this journal

(0) Thank | 风陵彩妍

What is your status after completing it?

(0) Thank | 风陵彩妍

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Sharing experience: It's been almost three months, and it's still in the hands of the editor. What's going on?

(0) Thank | 江南福萍

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: It's been almost three months, and it's still in the hands of the editor. What's going on?

(0) Thank | 九阴英飙

is almost three months old, still in the hands of the editor, what is the situation?

(3) Thank | thfn

almost three months, stillWhat is the situation in the editor?

(0) Thank | thfn

The main research content is mutation breeding of microalgae. The editor-in-chief and two reviewers are very interested. One reviewer suggested acceptance after modifications, while the other reviewer suggested further observation after modifications. 
Submission deadline: May 25, 2017
First major revision: August 16
Returned for minor revisions: September 27
Second minor revision submitted: September 29
Accepted: September 30
Overall, the review process was quite fast. The editor-in-chief and the reviewers were very nice, and their feedback was very objective. The efficiency in all aspects was very high. Articles on basic research and applications of microalgae seem to be more easily accepted

(0) Thank | 通背光磊

Reviewing is very fast, it took a month, but regret tragedy.Two reviewers, one comment is very detailed, the other one does not understand how to understand the article, just a random comment.

(1) Thank | xusss01

The review process was quite fast, only taking a month, but unfortunately it was a tragedy. One reviewer provided very detailed comments, while the other seemed to not have understood the article at all and just randomly criticized it

(0) Thank | 明冠颖萓

We can only hope for next year, after all, no need to worry as the overall trend is upward. Even if it only increases a little bit each year, it will accumulate over time, which is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This magazine is free

(0) Thank | 绮梦酱

Is this magazine free of charge?

(0) Thank | 罗汉博裕