In vitro fermentation of cattle rumen microorganisms; it is a short article. First submission: one month, I was required to resubmit after revision; Second revision: three months, two minor revisions. The comments raised by the reviewers were very professional and serious, which were difficult to answer. As long as they are answered carefully, the reviewers will not be too serious. After all, it is a small journal in Q3, which is suitable for the first time of submission and practice.

(1) Thank | SCI困难户

First submission: one month, I was required to resubmit after revision; Second revision: three months, two minor revisions. The comments raised by the reviewers were very professional and serious, some of them were difficult to answer. As long as they are answered carefully, the reviewers will not be too serious. After all, it is a small journal in Q3, which is suitable for the first time of submission and practice.

(1) Thank | SCI困难户

Can’t I search this journal on the web of science? Do you know what's going on?

(0) Thank | DaisyinSG

Two reviewers. The editor-in-chief did not find a third reviewer.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It's been a long time since I visited Letpub and I forgot my account. I left a comment under my old account and later submitted a paper to Journal 2 and it got accepted directly. The journal had previously rejected my paper after a resubmission half a month later

(0) Thank | 酿酒酵母

How long does it take to be rejected after reapplication?

(0) Thank | 接好运99

Did you submit it later? How fast is the review process?

(0) Thank | Virgil Vincent

Share the timeline of the recent submission to JAM manuscript, for reference only.
12/09/22 Submission
04/20/23 Minor revision
05/15/23 Major revision
06/14/23 Acceptance
06/22/23 Online publication
It took 6 and a half months, with a moderate processing speed, and the reviewers' comments were quite professional.

(3) Thank | PatrickPei

Research focus: Gut microbiota
Experience sharing: How is everyone's reviewing speed now?

(0) Thank | 风满娇洁

Excuse me, OP, how long does it take for the first review to come back? It has been three months for me and I still haven't received any news. Does this mean my article is not good?

(0) Thank | ToBo

Received! It was quite a journey, not easy at all.

(0) Thank | publish or perish

Hello, I would like to ask if this magazine charges for OA after accepting submissions. If so, how much is the fee? Thank you very much.

(0) Thank | 彩青

Hello, I would like to ask if there is still a fee for submitting without selecting OA? If there is a fee, how much is it? Thank you very much.

(0) Thank | 彩青

23.1.7 accepted translates to "23rd January 7th accepted" in English.

(0) Thank | self-help

12.22 Minor repair
12.27 Return for repair
12.29 under review

(0) Thank | self-help

2022. 7.13 Submission
2022. 10.25 Resubmitted after modification
2022. 11.26 Minor revision
2022.12.8 Accepted

(0) Thank | wei11

Both rounds of review resulted in rejection and resubmission because the reviewers kept asking questions persistently. The review comments and handling results will be sent to each author. Emphasis is placed on practical application.

(1) Thank | publish or perish

Submitted on 10.9, the editor still hasn't processed it until now! The speed is incredibly slow!

(0) Thank | self-help

Submission experience:
Submitted on 18th March 2022.
Received reviewer comments on 5th May 2022, minor revisions required (1-month revision period).
Revised on 3rd June 2022.
Accepted on 20th June 2022.
Overall, the editor was very nice, and the reviewer's comments were quite fair.
Before submitting the manuscript, I carefully checked the language, and the editor did not suggest any language modifications, so the process was relatively quick (3 months).

(1) Thank | 辉煌

22. On March 8th, there was a re-submission, with a minor revision in between, and now it has been accepted.

(0) Thank | 1234512

8.8 Submission
9.26 Return, minor revision
10.3 Submit revised draft, 10.31 Return, another minor revision
11.6 Submit revised draft again, 12.27 Return, another minor revision
12.28 Submit revised draft again, 1.10 Finally accepted
The process from submission to acceptance took 5 months.

(1) Thank | jingyuhui

Choose a post-hoc test method based on the data results obtained

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Post hoc comparisons are tests of hypotheses that were not specifically predicted in the research. It is very common in actual research: I have completed the experiment and verified the hypothesis, but I still need to extend the study, so I need to continue exploring the data and see which direction will produce valuable conclusions. At this point, it is equivalent to testing all possible comparisons (although in reality, I cannot exhaust all comparisons, but since there is no specific purpose, all comparisons are potential). Because comparisons do not only refer to differences in the means of two treatments, linear combinations of multiple treatments are also comparisons

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Why conduct post-inspection?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

What kind of post hoc test should I use?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys