Professor Shurong Wang from Zhejiang University is very professional, handling manuscripts timely and efficiently. The whole process and review process were very fast. Because I was slow to revise and it took time to polish, it took about 3 months in total. The comments raised by the editor and the experts were very professional and pertinent. The level and requirements of this journal are not low. I hope that the journal will become better! 07.05, submission; 07.15, it was resubmitted after reducing the similarity rate and revising; 07,15, under review; 08.02, there were 2 reviewers, and major revision was required; 09.08, the revision comments were returned; 09.22, minor revision was required, and it was also required to be polished; 10.09, the revised manuscript was submitted; 10.10, accepted!

(2) Thank | Sandy33

06.24, with journal; 06.28, under review; 07.13, under review; 07.16, revision requested; 08.30, with editor/review invited; 09.03, under review; 09.20, accept.

(1) Thank | pangpang

Flame-retardant, polymer material. 2019-09-03 With Journal. 2019-09-04 With Editor. 2019-09-13 transfer suggested Recommended journal: Polymer Degradation and stability we choose to accept!

(0) Thank | 风清扬

Very good journal. The reviewer was very responsible and the editor also made some technical comments. The impact factor of the journal is stable, and the review time is not very long. Highly recommended.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2.25 Submission
2.26 Under review
2.26 First reviewer accepted
3.21 Received two reviewer comments, entering RRC status

(0) Thank | chuni

2.25 Submission
2.26 Review
2.26 Accepted by the first reviewer
Awaiting good news

(0) Thank | chuni

Please translate the following paragraph into English:

1. 我们计划在周末去郊外露营，享受大自然的美丽和清新空气。

(0) Thank | WKY11

1.7 minor revision The editor is so kind, providing nearly 20 comments from two reviewers for minor revisions.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

The 1.5 RRC review time is still stuck before December 31st. Four waves of reviews have been sent, with one wave processed each week. Normal editing should have been done, is it because of the holidays?

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

12.31 rrc

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

12.24 New invitation for two reviewers, one of whom is expected to accept the review.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

12.17 is still under review. Another reviewer has been invited, but has not yet accepted the review. The third round of reviews has been initiated.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

Forgot to mention, a total of 5 people were invited for the first round of editing, and 2 accepted. For the second round of editing, 2 people were invited, and 1 accepted. The reviewer for major revisions did not accept, so a reviewer for minor revisions was selected.

(0) Thank | HC5277

The editing process went smoothly, and the matching editor was very easy to communicate with. The manuscript underwent major revisions followed by minor revisions before being accepted. The entire process from initial submission to acceptance took a total of 74 days, with the following specific time points:
2024.10.2 submitted to journal
2024.10.4 with editor
2024.10.6 Under Review
2024.10.8 two reviewers accepted
2024.11.2 Revision: Major Revision
2024.11.22 Revisions Being Processed
2024.11.22 With Editor
2024.11.30 Under Review
2024.12.5 one reviewer accepted & completed
2024.12.15 Revision: Minor Revision
2024.12.15 With Editor
2024.12.16 Accept

(0) Thank | HC5277

12.22 should have initiated the second round of review invitations. Previously it was 004, now it is 016. We hope that the two reviewers invited in the second round can provide their feedback.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

It has been eight days and no one has accepted the review yet.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

Nov 27, 2024 submitted
Dec 03, 2024 under review

The review process is moving quickly. Four people have been submitted, but no one has accepted the review yet. I hope the experts can help review my paper as soon as possible.

(0) Thank | 1594369135@qq.com

The editing efficiency is very high, the review process is fast, and eight reviewers were invited twice, with two agreeing to review. Received revision comments in one month, totaling 18, revised in one week, received second round of comments in four days, focused on improving language quality, revised in one week, and accepted.

June 25 Sub.; June 27 under review; August 6 review complete; August 15 revise; August 16 under review; August 27 review complete; September 1 revise; Available online 4 September 2024, Version of Record 6 September 2024.

(0) Thank | 终极！

Accepted on October 8, 2024.

(0) Thank | yaoleiyl

On September 9, 2024, return to the small repair.

(0) Thank | yaoleiyl

Received 14 August 2023
Major revision 20 December 2023
Received in revised form 28 January 2024
Accepted 30 January 2024
Available online 2 February 2024.

(1) Thank | Le-champagne

Most journals will conduct their own plagiarism checks, but the specific rate of plagiarism detection is not specified.

(0) Thank | 123

Hello, may I ask if this journal has any requirements for AIGC rate?

(0) Thank | 王墨

Received on May 28, 2024,
Revised on July 26, 2024,
Accepted on September 2, 2024
Reviewed by two reviewers, their comments are acceptable, minor revisions required.

(0) Thank | hmliu

7.31 submission
8.1 editing
8.2 review
8.3 two reviewers
8.19 feedback on revision, a total of 21 revision suggestions
8.26 revised manuscript submitted, currently with the editor, waiting for the outcome

(0) Thank | 123